Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE S*** Hits the Fan (TSHTF) Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: In what year do you honestly believe will TSHTF?

Unread postby GreyGhost » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 08:28:16

well no, I meant each of the bullet points has happened :roll:
Unless you count that thing I saw in ocean's 11 :-D
User avatar
GreyGhost
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed 31 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: In what year do you honestly believe will TSHTF?

Unread postby patience » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 09:14:58

I voted 2009, expecting the powers that be to try their best to hold it together until after elections in '08, then a major credit/banking collapse to follow when it can no longer be prevented. Kontratieff Winter. Decline of oil production will surely occur, making any recovery that much harder.
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

Re: In what year do you honestly believe will TSHTF?

Unread postby evilgenius » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 11:13:09

I voted this year because I think this is when the economic implications are going to become undeniable. This year we will see the supply demand equation rocked by the peak and not rumors of the peak or manipulation that can be attributed to localized disruption. Who knows if this will cause a full on market blow out. I suspect it will, however.

As for the inevitable wars both small and large, well that will probably be after Hillary gets in and they try her out on Iraq in order to attempt to seal the deal regarding control of the Iraqi fields. I don't know if Hillary will flounder for a year or two before the other side in the post Cold War world pushes back, but the Russians will at some point. They won't be able to help it what with having been boxed in by Western policy until then and then to be presented will that same policy's patent failure. It could shake out as a war avoided by intense negotiations but somehow given the Machiavellian nature of the Western approach I doubt that.
When it comes down to it, the people will always shout, "Free Barabbas." They love Barabbas. He's one of them. He has the same dreams. He does what they wish they could do. That other guy is more removed, more inscrutable. He makes them think. "Crucify him."
User avatar
evilgenius
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3730
Joined: Tue 06 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Stopped at the Border.

Re: In what year do you honestly believe will TSHTF?

Unread postby Newfie » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 12:05:55

I vote 2009 for similar reasons. Both parties have invested heavily in the campaigns and want something predictable to happen. Also there is a very large amount of denial and that will tend to keep things going on for a while.

What will really happen is not that some physical/economical factor will kick in but that all of a sudden public opinion will be convinced of some change and the average public attitude will make a dramatic shift. Could be oil price, could be economy, could be another WMD, who knows.

I just hope it holds out until 2010 so I can cash out my 401K and then run like hell.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: In what year do you honestly believe will TSHTF?

Unread postby jboogy » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 12:08:24

Also believe they are delaying economic crash by any and all means until after Shrillary/Obama takes office. I'm not sure TPTB will be able to put it off that long, it's really starting to look as if things are unraveling at a pretty good clip right now. I see Shrillary being on board with the whole military , imperial resource grab but not Obama. But since Obama has achieved mainstream acceptance he may have been vetted and OK'd by the PTB and once in office we'll see business as usual out of the oval office.
Perhaps the population would be less swayed to socialism if we had fewer examples of socialism from our "Free Market Capitalists". -----fiddler dave
User avatar
jboogy
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1191
Joined: Mon 06 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: the place where smartasses dwell

Re: In what year do you honestly believe will TSHTF?

Unread postby Plantagenet » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 13:54:53

I voted 2011. About 2-3 years of a democratic-controlled House and Senate combined with a Hillary presidency should be enough to turn the upcoming recession into a full-blown depression. :P
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: In what year do you honestly believe will TSHTF?

Unread postby Ayoob » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 14:02:11

1965 is when TSHTF. That was the best of times. Barely 200 million Africans were starving to death.
User avatar
Ayoob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby efarmer » Sat 12 Jan 2008, 17:25:10

All right, all right. I agree TSHTF. Could you tell me where to stand so I am on the input side of the fan instead of the splattering output side?
I don't mind the smell so much, but I would like to skip all the little polka dots if I can.
User avatar
efarmer
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2003
Joined: Fri 17 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby abelardlindsay » Sun 13 Jan 2008, 14:56:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('basil_hayden', 'T')he uneven distribution won't be noticed until a neighbor, such as Mexico, bites the dust. Then TSHTF effectively for us. The psychology of it can probably best be described as the first time you see a house on your road with a foreclosure sign on it, and realize you're basically a hop, skip and jump away from that yourself.


When TSHTF in Mexico they are all going to migrate north -- not for economic opportunity but because they are starving. Lately Haliburton and KBR have been contracted to build a lot of detention centers near the border in Texas. Oil is 40% of Mexican government revenues and production is in decline.
User avatar
abelardlindsay
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 392
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Northern California, USA

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby Schneider » Sun 13 Jan 2008, 20:07:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('abelardlindsay', ' ')Lately Haliburton and KBR have been contracted to build a lot of detention centers near the border in Texas. Oil is 40% of Mexican government revenues and production is in decline.


American gouvernement actually doing something again the mexican immigrants !? Nonsense :roll:..

Sorry,coun't restrain myself :(! This is not gonna look pretty..

Schneider
(Schneider's Books For The Future)
(Schneider's Big 5 Basic Advice For The Newcomers)
[url=http://youtube.com/watch?v=vL7Jo_1Z3Y8]Free Hugs!!![/
User avatar
Schneider
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 503
Joined: Sat 23 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada/Quebec Province

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby mos6507 » Mon 14 Jan 2008, 17:06:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('abelardlindsay', '
')When TSHTF in Mexico they are all going to migrate north -- not for economic opportunity but because they are starving. Lately Haliburton and KBR have been contracted to build a lot of detention centers near the border in Texas. Oil is 40% of Mexican government revenues and production is in decline.


We can only hope they do that. It's every man for himself during the crash. We can't let foreign zombie hordes swamp the US and drag it down. Even if we wind up dealing with illegals like Children of Men, it's a matter of survival.
mos6507
 

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby qwanta » Sat 19 Jan 2008, 22:19:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('abelardlindsay', '
')When TSHTF in Mexico they are all going to migrate north -- not for economic opportunity but because they are starving. Lately Haliburton and KBR have been contracted to build a lot of detention centers near the border in Texas. Oil is 40% of Mexican government revenues and production is in decline.


We can only hope they do that. It's every man for himself during the crash. We can't let foreign zombie hordes swamp the US and drag it down. Even if we wind up dealing with illegals like Children of Men, it's a matter of survival.


Step1: Dump low-priced, subsidized corn onto the Mexican market making it unfeasible for small farmers to eke out a living.
Step2: With a now captive market, jack up prices of corn exports and decrease exports as pesticide and fertilizer costs go up and corn is siphoned off into ethanol production.
Step3: Mow down the "zombie hordes" of dispossessed Mexican farmers with machine-guns as they attempt to flee North from their now impossible living conditions
Step4: ?
Step5: Profit?

Once in a while, it would be nice if American corporate oligarchs and bankers were held accountable for their actions, in particular this mindless drive to make every developing country dependent on fossil fuel technology, and large mechanized agriculture when they all used to have relatively sustainable and low-impact societies. It's a pattern that's been repeated all over the world (Green Revolution anyone?), and when the SHTF and the dispossessed peasants start starving and emigrating we throw up our hands like they're a bunch of idiots and we had nothing to do with their problems...
User avatar
qwanta
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue 08 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby pup55 » Sat 19 Jan 2008, 22:47:06

Mexico:

Population 108 million, minus about 20 million that are up here.

Arable land: 243,000 sq km. That's about 450 people per square km, twice as much as the US, but nowhere near the problem that Pakistan or Tanzania has.

Life expectancy: about 75. Live births per mother, only about 2.39.

30% of the population is under 14, and there are 20 births per 1000 population, in the US it's 20% and 14, so they are having a few too many babies.

Per capita income: over $10K.

only .3% admit to having AIDS.

So I have to say, in the grand scheme of things, if you have to pick a place to live to ride out Oilmageddon, I would rather do it in Mexico than in Tanzania or Pakistan.

I think Mexico's problems are about 98% political. Their economy is run by a corrupt drug- or oil-fueled oligarchy, who are more interested in consolidating their own power and making themselves richer than in making their country more habitable. This has caused 25% "underemployment" and 20 million of their most productive citizens have chosen to chuck it and head north.

Having all of those young people up here keeps them from having the revolution that they need to straighten up the society down there.

CIA world factbook
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby RedStateGreen » Sat 19 Jan 2008, 22:52:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('qwanta', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('abelardlindsay', '
')When TSHTF in Mexico they are all going to migrate north -- not for economic opportunity but because they are starving. Lately Haliburton and KBR have been contracted to build a lot of detention centers near the border in Texas. Oil is 40% of Mexican government revenues and production is in decline.


We can only hope they do that. It's every man for himself during the crash. We can't let foreign zombie hordes swamp the US and drag it down. Even if we wind up dealing with illegals like Children of Men, it's a matter of survival.


Step1: Dump low-priced, subsidized corn onto the Mexican market making it unfeasible for small farmers to eke out a living.
Step2: With a now captive market, jack up prices of corn exports and decrease exports as pesticide and fertilizer costs go up and corn is siphoned off into ethanol production.
Step3: Mow down the "zombie hordes" of dispossessed Mexican farmers with machine-guns as they attempt to flee North from their now impossible living conditions
Step4: ?
Step5: Profit?

The profit is in detention facilities. Google Hutto work camp, that one even has little kids in there. Halliburton builds them and gets paid, then the states (Texas is a big location for these, I think they have at least three) get paid for housing them in dirt poor conditions, and I'm sure everyone gets kickbacks all round.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', '&')quot;Taste the sizzling fury of fajita skillet death you marauding zombie goon!"

First thing to ask: Cui bono?
User avatar
RedStateGreen
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1859
Joined: Sun 16 Sep 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Top

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby strider3700 » Sun 20 Jan 2008, 04:31:37

the profit is in putting the land back into use after you claim it since everyone that used to live there has left/died.
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby Pops » Sun 20 Jan 2008, 16:20:05

I’ve posted recently on several threads that corn was over $5.30/bu for March delivery, up from 2.50 last years and $1.20 the year before.

Beans (soy, like corn, is a main input to your Big Mac, Sausage Biscuit and Buffalo Wings) are somewhere north of $13/bu and wheat around $5.x.


Interestingly nobody here seems to get too excited – at least not yet.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby dinopello » Sun 20 Jan 2008, 16:36:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'B')eans (soy, like corn, is a main input to your Big Mac, Sausage Biscuit and Buffalo Wings) are somewhere north of $13/bu and wheat around $5.x.


Interestingly nobody here seems to get too excited – at least not yet.


I might guess that in general it hasn't been too talked about because at the "restaurant", the Big mac prices haven't increased by a proportional amount. I don't know, have they increased at all? - I don't eat fast food. I've always wondered how they can sell stuff so cheap, now it's getting scary.

And, now McDonalds is puuting in espresso bars and baristas in every location - go figure. They clearly don't see TSHTF.

The price increases have hit at the grocery store, but I think there is greater lag to get to the restaurants who don't want to reprint menus etc, so they eat it (pardon the pun) for a while.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby Pops » Sun 20 Jan 2008, 17:14:05

I was being facetious talking about Big Macs. Corn and its byproducts especially, are used in just about everything we eat form cereal to soda pop to eggs to beef and pork, and as corn is increasingly sold to make ethanol, the price of other feeds for the meat we eat are going to rise because of that ethanol demand.

So a 400% increase in corn prices in three years (which has not impacted the supermarket as yet – and remember these are May delivery prices and even chickens take a few months to transition to Nuggets) will affect every aspect of the food economy.

For a board seeking to devine the future this seems a little bit of a blind spot I'm thinking.


I guess this is the last time I'll post this chart...
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: TSHTF but not evenly distributed

Unread postby patience » Sun 20 Jan 2008, 19:05:43

Yeah, Pops, some of us do watch the grain futures. That could mean that my farmer customers could actually afford to bring me business next year. I was kinda hoping for a slower year, to get some prep work done. Oh, well, as they say, make hay when the sun shines. I make money when the farmers do.

That doesn't mean "even distribution" here, however. The other half of the economy, the factories in the Rust Belt, are in sad shape,and getting worse.

The the lag time you pointed out, from farm prices to end users, is a market I play for grocery savings. Time to buy that efficient freezer and stuff it with meat, before the grain prices and this year's beef slaughter due to hay shortage in the midwest, finally show up in the freezer case at the gracery.
User avatar
patience
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 3180
Joined: Fri 04 Jan 2008, 04:00:00

after TSHTF

Unread postby bodigami » Thu 06 Mar 2008, 03:20:10

will you stop buying _? I was inspired to post this by the "crazy" topic, but had the idea some time ago (without plans to post it because it may be a bit random).

bonus digital cookie or pie points for posters that explain the rationale that went for this questions or add other questions.
bodigami
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1921
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron