by billg » Thu 10 Jan 2008, 10:41:31
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', '[')url=http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/10/02623/2264/85/434176]Enough with the "Diebold Hacked the NH Primary" Lunacy[/url]
These aren't touch-screen voting machines. They are optical scan machines. There's a paper trail. It would be insane to try to hack the results, because a paper ballot count would show the fraud.
The only thing that happened in New Hampshire is that a lot of people made up their minds at the last minute, after the pollsters had gone away. As one pollster put it, a primary is not like a general election. Generally, voters like all the candidates, and are picking the one they like most. It's like choosing a flavor of ice cream. You don't make your choice days or weeks before. You decide when you're standing at the counter.
Your article states that more than half the votes cast are counted by the Accuvote voting machines (it doesn't say what percent). The number is actually 81%! Here are all the municipalities which include Nashua and Manchester. It doesn't take much fiddling to sway an election. Fiddling with the numbers in 10 or so municipalities could change the outcome.
http://www.sos.nh.gov/voting%20machines2006.htmThat article doesn't prove anything. There would have to be recount of all those ballots which were tabulated by the machines. Obama would be regarded as the "National Sore Loser" if he actually asked for a hand recount in a primary.
This was a "do or die" election for Clinton, hence the motivation for cheating.
It's amazing that anyone would put so much trust into these machines and the people that sell them. The national sales and marketing director for LHS Associates is a convicted criminal.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '1')-9-08:
New England voting machine firm has executive criminal record http://www.blackboxvoting.org/They program every single voting machine in New Hampshire, Connecticut, almost all of Massachusetts, Vermont, and Maine. But did state officials in five New England states ever do a criminal background check on this company's executives? Do the laws of these five states even ALLOW them to hire convicted criminals for services paid for by the state? What about over 500 local towns and municipalities?
According to my sources, LHS Marketing and Sales Director Ken Hajjar grew up with owner John Silvestro in Lawrence, Massachusetts. They both moved to Londonderry, New Hampshire, where Ken Hajjar was arrested, indicted, and pleaded guilty to "sale / CND" and sentenced to 12 months in the Rockingham County Correctional facility, and fined $2000. As things go for the politically connected, he was then given a deferred sentence and $1000 of his fine was suspended.
Hajjar doesn't limit his involvement in the voting machine business to sales. According to an interview conducted by Dori Smith, as reported here:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=5320, Hajjar totes memory cards around in the trunk of his car and defends the boggling concept of swapping out memory cards during the middle of elections.
Hold onto your hats, there's more. Start with this YouTube video, if you haven't already seen it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PiiaBqwqkXs In an unusual confluence of available video, we obtained footage of Silvestro grappling with Harri Hursti, the master hacker who had his way with the Diebold optical scans in Leon County, Florida in the famous exploit that was showcased in the film Hacking Democracy.
The exact same make, model and version hacked in the Black Box Voting project in Leon County is used throughout New Hampshire, where about 45 percent of elections administrators hand count paper ballots at the polling place, with the remaining locations all using the Diebold version 1.94w optical scan machine. Because the voting machine locations tend to be urban, this represents about 81 percent of the New Hampshire voters.
The video shows Harri Hursti testifying on Sept. 19 before the New Hampshire legislature, attempting to explain significant vulnerabilities requiring urgent mitigations; throughout his testimony, Silvestro inserted his own comments, opinions, misstatements and speculations.
One area of disagreement between Hursti and Silvestro was the amount of expertise needed to exploit the Diebold 1.94w optical scan system. Silvestro claimed (in a strange contortion of reasoning) that he doesn't hire very skilled programmers, implying that this makes New Hampshire elections more secure.
Hursti pointed out that hiring programmers with a lack of knowledge is generally not considered a security feature, and also that an average high schooler can learn to exploit the... More