by Denny » Sat 22 Dec 2007, 01:59:48
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SpringCreekFarm', 'I') was afraid if I read this thread it would piss me off. And it has.
Funny how true colours of some people come out when you put this before them.
Denny, it doesn't surprise me that you'd feel that way about Natives because your stinking so-called Christians gave a grand colonial attempt at assimilation and the stealing of Native lands and is clearly written in the history books. Fuck you both.
Now that native groups are finally getting strength and fighting for their rights and trying to get their stolen lands back, fucktards like Denny and Ferret try to make like there is some hidden conspiracy to screw over the poor non-Natives.
To all those who wrote sane, kind words, thank you.
I will apologize, I think I wrote more out of emotion, my basic feelings, which is my old man, than from what my beliefs tell me to become the new man I should be.
Yes, great wrongs were done to the first nations, rights violated, but in many cases you have to admit, it was done with a vision of a better way of life for the native peoples. Paternalistic, yes it was. But, in preaching the Christian faith, don't you honestly believe that Europeans were sharing their most precious possession? Why did the Canadian martyrs risk their lives to share this faith, knowing the risks? Because they felt it was worth it, to save souls. It was not for the land. We may look askance at that degree of faith today, but I don't think you can doubt their sincerity, their commitment and their love of their fellow man.
But, many deals were made with the native people in good faith and you have to admit, it seems like today everything is getting tied up with lawsuits and land seizures and I have to ask, what happened to keeping your word? When you say your lands were stolen, how can that be proven? Maybe some of your ancestors signed some bum deals, but a deal is a deal, right? I think the only way Indians have been cheated on the treaties is that the treaty money payment today is worthless compared to the historic value and these should be inflation indexed. If treaties are abrogated, then it will cast a pall over future deals with the native peoples, as negotiators will believe the terms will ultimately be contested, and that just creates all kinds of confusion and added cost for lawyers and interferes with planning.
Things work so much better when people stick to the written agreements, otherwise you have chaos. My sister is a lawyer and she says it causes all kinds of concern and worry on land deals by her clients when they feel their is a hindrance due to land claims. So all this muss and fuss is causing good people grief.