by kabu » Fri 21 Dec 2007, 09:06:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Denny', '
')I'd like to know, if the governments did a P&L statment with the Indian bands what it would show. Put taxes collected on the left side, and, on the right hand side, money paid toward Indians for all kinds of services, most of which did not exist at the time of their treaties being signed. I'd love to know the "net".
You think an accountant could ever be the judge of how good our countries have been for them? With a fucking P&L statement tallying up every "modern" service rendered?
That wouldn't even give you a glimpse of the whole story. It wouldn't in any way account for all the social and environmental equity these groups have lost. If you asked everyone with even a shred of history in their heads whether or not these guys are at all better off since these treaties were made, the answer would be a resounding "no!" Of course, before most of those treaties were made they'd after they'd already been fucked over, and over and over...
I hope they follow through with this and that they're soon able to take back a small part of their dignity within their own nation (I'm not sure how badly this group's culture has been colonized).
Don't worry, if the government stops subsidizing the Lakota's rotted way of life, they'll just start propping up some other malinvestment for you to make a fuss over (if you catch on).
EDIT: never mind, for you it would be one of the ones our government subsidizes