Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 15:18:44

A poster named Bob Shaw on theoildrum has as his constant sig file, "are humans smarter than yeast?"

I do not think they are.

More food = more yeast, always.

Some people say that humans are indeed smarter than yeast, since in times of plenty, like in the present American Empire and in the European Empire, in times of plenty birth rate has gone down.

However, consumption has gone up! The yeast have in effect become super-yeast, fewer in numbers but with each super-yeast the equivalent of 3, 5, maybe 10, regular yeast.

To find a parallel with Nature, I'd have to find an instance where yeast or other simple organisms, in response to plentiful food, curb their numbers to some degree but individuals get larger.

I'm going to postulate that numerous examples exist in Nature, and ask knowledgable people here, like Leanan, Smallpoxgirl, Shannyara, et. al., the science-educated, to cite examples.

And all to prove that no matter what anyone says, humans are not any smarter than yeast!
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby Jack » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 16:14:22

Of course humans are no smarter than yeast.

In the presence of abundant resources, yeast cells increase their consumption exponentially.

In the presence of abundant resources, [s]yeast cells[/s] humans increase their consumption exponentially.

In the presence of abundant resources, yeast cells expand in number, change their environment, and then experience a population dieoff.

And humans are doing what? Hmm?
Jack
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4929
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 16:22:49

Right on Jack :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

I want to see if someone more knowledgeable than myself in single-celled matters can show us examples where yeasts, bacteria, etc have responded to greater resources by becoming less numerous, but bigger individually, thus consuming more overall.

Thus showing that humans are no smarter than yeast.

Or as they used to say, about Africa, "We feed, they breed". And as is said about Americans, that both figuratively and literally, they are Homo colossus.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby SchroedingersCat » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 17:41:16

Yeast win. They eat sugar and p*ss booze all day. I'd like to see a human who could do that!
Civilization is a personal choice.
SchroedingersCat
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu 26 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The ragged edge

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby Plantagenet » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 18:04:59

Yeast and humans behave about the same when resources are abundant. But when resources get scarce, they behave differently.

Yeast continue to breed up to the limit of their resources. Humans have historically used various strategies to voluntarily reduce their numbers. Here in Alaska, the Aleut people have many stories about the older members of the communities voluntarily going outside in winter to die when food resources are scarce. In Europe, huge numbers of fertile people voluntarily went into monasteries and nunneries in the middle ages, helping to restrict population growth. In China female infantacide may have had the same effect in pre-Communist times, and more recently the state has been carrying out a "one-child" policy.

And of course humans will wage war for territory and resources. I'll bet you can't name a single yeast species that has nuclear capabilities. :roll:
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 19:07:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'Y')east and humans behave about the same when resources are abundant. But when resources get scarce, they behave differently.


That's what many think, but humans will always expand right up to the limit. And when up against the limit, your "self-regulating" societies will probably, like Americans but a bit less exaggeratedly, decrease their numbers but consume more individually, so that absolute consumption is right as high as it can possibly be.

So, I win. Except for the pissing booze part, yeast have us beat there.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby Dezakin » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 21:08:57

Yeast don't engineer their own environment to expand the limit...
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 21:33:36

a lot of single-celled organisms do, and I'm not sure if yeast do or not - I think they may make the pH balance or something best for them and not other "germs" while they ferment away in the wine barrel....
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby Dezakin » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 21:43:25

No they don't. They dont go out and make a new wine barrel when the one they're in gets snug, or arrange to have more sugar pumped in when it starts to run low. The humans = yeast analogy fails on the most basic distinction of humanity from all other species: Humans don't simply react; humans intelligently adapt, and engineer their solutions.
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 22:17:00

yeast can only pollute a vat of juice, humans can do the whole planet. If indeed the function of life is to homogenize gradients and accelerate entropic processes, then humans are orders of magnitude above yeast in intelligence.
Turn those Machines back On! - Don Ameche in Trading Places
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby Kingcoal » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 22:19:20

Yeast have the ability to go into "suspended animation," humans don't have that ability yet. When a yeast cell runs out of resources, it starts to build a shell around itself. After the water dries up, the yeast take on a form familiar to any bread or beer maker; an off white power of spores. When water is added, the yeast dissolve their shell and come back to life. The spore state is common in the microcellular world. Hell, if you want some yeast, just squat down and take a crap. The average human has at least a pound of this organism in their lower intestine. It's a symbiotic relationship, the yeast gets a warm, comfortable place to live and the human gets B vitamins produced by yeast digestion.

Humans just simply die off. In my opinion, yeast will out survive us.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby Dezakin » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 22:28:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'y')east can only pollute a vat of juice, humans can do the whole planet. If indeed the function of life is to homogenize gradients and accelerate entropic processes, then humans are orders of magnitude above yeast in intelligence.

Oh and when they start to 'pollute' the whole solar system I'm sure that will be an even greater tragedy.
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby Revi » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 22:45:04

We are not "smarter", but we may be more intelligent. It may have made more sense to stay within the food supply, but this time we are coming off of an enormous feast for over a century. We increased our numbers and lived a much larger life for a while. Now it's over, so maybe just like the yeast it's time to produce something out of our decline, like alcohol.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 22:51:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', 'N')o they don't. They dont go out and make a new wine barrel when the one they're in gets snug, or arrange to have more sugar pumped in when it starts to run low. The humans = yeast analogy fails on the most basic distinction of humanity from all other species: Humans don't simply react; humans intelligently adapt, and engineer their solutions.


Have humans made a new Earth? Where do humans have more sugar pumped in from and what do they do when it runs out?

Humans do indeed simply react, they adapt only out of necessity and if there's not enough wine left in the barrel they adapt by dying off. Engineer their own solutions? It's 50/50 if Amurrikans will get back to the Moon to do more "rooster tails" in a Rover, there will be no expansion into space for us.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby Dezakin » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 23:00:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', 'N')o they don't. They dont go out and make a new wine barrel when the one they're in gets snug, or arrange to have more sugar pumped in when it starts to run low. The humans = yeast analogy fails on the most basic distinction of humanity from all other species: Humans don't simply react; humans intelligently adapt, and engineer their solutions.


Have humans made a new Earth? Where do humans have more sugar pumped in from and what do they do when it runs out?

Are you completely ignorant of history? Humans were hunter-gather cultures that started pressing their limits and engineered agricultural methods. Whenever more limits were encountered, more solutions were derived. Water shortages: Irrigation. Climate difficulties, advanced shelter and clothing. Distribution issues: Transport. Energy shortages: Coal, oil, nuclear power.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')umans do indeed simply react, they adapt only out of necessity and if there's not enough wine left in the barrel they adapt by dying off.

This is more of a guess than an observation since human 'die offs' are incredibly rare historically. Theres no reason to assume humans are more likely to adapt by dieing off than simply expanding the resource base the way they allways have and the way yeast cant.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')ngineer their own solutions? It's 50/50 if Amurrikans will get back to the Moon to do more "rooster tails" in a Rover, there will be no expansion into space for us.

Todays americans wont go into space at all; That task is at least a hundred years away. The only chore ahead is continually expanding the economy and energy production some hundred fold to support a spacefaring society in the centuries that follow.
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 23:13:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', 'T')he only chore ahead is continually expanding the economy and energy production some hundred fold to support a spacefaring society in the centuries that follow.


That's right, Danskin! We can do it!
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ
Top

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby Dezakin » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 23:26:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', 'T')he only chore ahead is continually expanding the economy and energy production some hundred fold to support a spacefaring society in the centuries that follow.


That's right, Danskin! We can do it!

Of course we can. Light water reactors take only steel, concrete, expertise and uranium, which we have plenty of. Molten salt reactors are similar but some 200 times more fuel efficient and likely less capital intensive.

Of course theres also wind and solar, which will be viable some day I'm sure, but you dont need to assume that to get healthy growth for several centuries.
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby roccman » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 23:26:46

I have talked with Bob several times over the years...

He was my favorite poster at the oil drum...very insightful...very tolerant.

He is much much smarter than yeast.
"There must be a bogeyman; there always is, and it cannot be something as esoteric as "resource depletion." You can't go to war with that." Emersonbiggins
User avatar
roccman
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4065
Joined: Fri 27 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Great Sonoran Desert

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby basil_hayden » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 23:30:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', 'T')he only chore ahead is continually expanding the economy and energy production some hundred fold to support a spacefaring society in the centuries that follow.


That's right, Danskin! We can do it!

Of course we can. Light water reactors take only steel, concrete, expertise and uranium, which we have plenty of. Molten salt reactors are similar but some 200 times more fuel efficient and likely less capital intensive.

Of course theres also wind and solar, which will be viable some day I'm sure, but you dont need to assume that to get healthy growth for several centuries.


If we have plenty of uranium, why is it that we only mined 60% of what we used last year?

And if we had unlimited energy, does that mean we could have unlimited population?

Isn't that the same problem yeast have?

I don't see a viable answer from either species.
User avatar
basil_hayden
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1581
Joined: Mon 08 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT, USA
Top

Re: Are humans smarter than yeast (nod to Bob Shaw)

Unread postby Dezakin » Thu 06 Dec 2007, 23:45:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('basil_hayden', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dezakin', 'T')he only chore ahead is continually expanding the economy and energy production some hundred fold to support a spacefaring society in the centuries that follow.


That's right, Danskin! We can do it!

Of course we can. Light water reactors take only steel, concrete, expertise and uranium, which we have plenty of. Molten salt reactors are similar but some 200 times more fuel efficient and likely less capital intensive.

Of course theres also wind and solar, which will be viable some day I'm sure, but you dont need to assume that to get healthy growth for several centuries.


If we have plenty of uranium, why is it that we only mined 60% of what we used last year?

Because we've been burning surplus enriched uranium from the cold war that shut down most uranium mines years ago by depressing the uranium price. You really want to contest that uranium resources are limitless for any scope of time worth discussing?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd if we had unlimited energy, does that mean we could have unlimited population?
If we truely had unlimited energy we could have unlimited population. It would be a chore to convert a lot of that energy, wherever it came from, into matter, and the matter into living space, shelter, and food, but these are minor engineering details. It's an interesting discussion to have, but ultimately a strawman since we aren't talking about unlimited energy or population out towards eternity. At some point humanity doesn't look like humanity anymore well before the 'population limit' starts to pinch and the argument becomes meaningless. I expect this is many centuries away and beyond speculation.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')sn't that the same problem yeast have?
Perhaps you're right and I've been to hasty. The humans=yeast analogy is allright I guess if the barrel is the universe and the sugar is all the energy in it.
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron