by Duende » Tue 06 Nov 2007, 22:33:49
Very interesting article. In my mind it paints a picture of how things are likely to play out. I'll pull a snippet from the article to illustrate my point:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Q: What about a peak in gas production?
A: That's much, much further out. There is a lot of what they call stranded natural gas, big discoveries that are not tied to any local needs, or any local distribution system, and they will be tapped and brought in, in liquefied form to our country and to Europe and to Asia. The peak of natural gas now roughly looks like it will be in 2035 to 2040. There is a finite supply that is being drawn down, but it hasn't been exploited nearly as much as oil. The run-up in natural gas prices in the past year or so was because production in this country has peaked, and natural gas is more expensive and difficult to move from one continent to another, and we don't really have the means to do that yet. We are getting there and the big liquefied natural gas expansion is starting, and soon we are going to have interchangeability between continents. When one continent is short we can move gas there, which will keep prices down.
So, my crystal ball says:
1. Oil gets really expensive in the near term, as supply cannot reach demand.
2. Corn production continues to grow (as do subsidies for corn production).
3. Natural gas production really intensifies in the middle of nowhere, as giant LNG boats are produced which can carry the stuff back here.
4. Natural gas is used to produce the corn ethanol, which is hailed (at least initially) as our saving grace.
So, I can't help but think that Maxwell's point is that natural gas will be THE answer to softening the fall after the oil peak hits. Between it and tar sands, anyway.
Granted the cost of energy will rise, the environment will continue to go to hell, but it gives a certain relief I must admit that we won't run into
physical energy restraints so soon. Soccer moms rejoice!