by Twilight » Sat 20 Oct 2007, 14:52:03
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ardalla', 'A')t the Dan Yergin School of Economics, supply always rises to meet demand given a free market. Been hearing permutations on this all week from Fred Thompson, Al Greenspan and 90% of the 'experts' on CNBC.
I wonder how well that works in a market dominated by national oil companies and a cartel. How do they reconcile the theory?
Let's use their logic here. In a free market, when demand rises to capacity, prices rise, and new supply becomes available to meet demand. But national companies and international cartels inhibit the correct operation of a free market. Therefore if the market is prevented from functioning properly, new supply may not be forthcoming.
It follows, doesn't it? So either state industries and cartels are compatible with a free market

or new supply is not a given.
Which statement is going to make them splutter into their coffee harder?