by jasonraymondson » Tue 02 Oct 2007, 12:22:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('max_power29', '"')The Peace Corps, by the way, is basically a cover for mil-gov and corporate operations. They'll send a couple volunteers into a poor village that just so happens to be near an oil reserve or gold mine or something that they figure will be of great importance 10 or 20 years in the future. That's why there were all those Peace Corps volunteers sent in to Africa starting 30-to-40 years ago. The oil and weaons companies, the IMF, etc. all knew that African oil and resources would be extremely important in the future as more accessible reserves were depleted. So they take some bright eyed 24 year old, have them help the poor villagers for 2 years. Fast forward 20 years and the former volunteer is now working for one of those corporations or the IMF or World Bank creating psy-ops, excuse me "public relations" so that the village's oil reserves can be sold to Shell or Occidental.
It's all couched in terms of economic development that is purported to help pull the village out of poverty so the former Peace Corps volunteer, who has probably retained at least a bit of their youthful idealism, doesn't realize what is going on until they're in too deep and need the high paying job to pay for their kid to go to the liberal arts college. So by that time they will have rationalized whatever it is they're involved in.
Of course, not all or even the majority of former volunteers go on to work directly for MNCs. That's no big deal as their time in the Corps still serves, albeit indireclty, the interests of the MNCs.
The idea is to give the villagers a favorable connection to westerners so that when the World Bank and IMF show up the villagers are more open to them. Most likely the 43 year old MBA from Occidental Petroleum who shows up in 2007 looks and sounds darn similar, at least to the villagers, as the 23 year old liberal arts major Peace corps volunteer.who showed up back in 1987.
It's the same thing that missionaries did back in the 17th and 18th centuries. The missionaries would go in with good intentions and get on friendly terms with the natives for a generation or so. The natives get used to the westerners, even start to like them. Then, not coincidentally, the western MNCs move in 25-to-50 years later, kill off the villagers, and grab the resources.
If you want to learn mor about how this works, check out "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" for a more in-depth explanation of how this works.
If a person is of high character and wants to be of service there are plenty of ways to be of service within 100 miles of their location. But those opportunities haven't been given the prestige of the Peace Corps. Gee, I wonder why . . .
The people who volunteer for this sort of thing are usually big-hearted idealists and thus, by their very nature, tend not to be able to comprehend the truly sinister nature of what is going. And since it feels so good to help people while they're on their tour, it becomes even more impossible for their brain to understand what is really going on. "After all, how could helping poor people in the third wold be part of a larger plan so incredibly sinister?", the brain thinks to itself. The reality of the bigger picture conflicts with their experience during their 2 years so the brain can't quite come to grips with the truth."- Matt Savinar From LATOC
I would like to know how Matt Savinar came up with this oh so brilliant expose. Where exactly did he and you get your facts from.
All you seem to be doing is respreading crap, that he doesn't have the sources to back up.
How about you come with some information on your own before spewing someone elses BS