by Heineken » Wed 05 Sep 2007, 22:32:41
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'T')hat sure looks like "giving up" to me, Heineken.
Are you saying that no humans can be saved? That if we try to set up a different ("sustainable") way of life that won't help anyone survive?
I haven't given up behaviorally, Ludi. I go through the motions. For example, I still plant trees. I care deeply about my land and do whatever I can to treat it gently.
There are still days when I'm so engaged in my scratchings that I forget all about the dismal big picture.
But deep down I recognize the futility . . . is that so hard to understand?
No, I'm not saying that no humans can be saved. I think extinction is rather unlikely in the short term. But wouldn't you agree that even a partial dieoff and collapse can be equated with "doom"?
I share some of your problems with depression related to all this, and frankly my own occasional depression is deepening. For someone who loves nature in general and animals in particular, these are dark, dark times.
The best part of the world is dying or dead; doom is already here. What we have lost! And what we will yet lose! It boggles the mind. It's the ultimate crime.
There is a tendency even among our enlightened group to overlook the losses that have already happened or that are about to happen. People are so fixated on surviving personally that the disappearance of the world's penguins, polar bears, narwhals, walruses, coral-reef systems, etc.---and hey, while we're at it, throw in the plant and animal life of the entire Amazon region---gets tacked onto the list of concerns almost as an afterthought.
I see much "hubris" (MQ's favorite word) on this thread. You're smart people but you still see the future through an overlay of the past (which is only natural to do). All the rules are going to change, and your "preparations" may, like clothing you've outgrown, prove pathetically ill-fitting.