by Heineken » Wed 05 Sep 2007, 17:20:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('davep', 'D')oom is having no answers to the impending reality. Doom is passivity and its repercussions. . . . If I were a doomer (by my definition) I wouldn't envisage ways to improve the future. . . . Strutting around with a doomer sandwich board proclaiming "The End Is Nigh" is of no use to anyone.
You equate doomerism with giving up.
My impression is that many doomers (myself included) accept the reality of impending doom but also choose to fight on.
This approach is, after all, merely an extension of how we live our individual lives. That is, individuals know they are going to die sooner or later, but they choose to live in the meantime.
It could be argued that many optimists are also of no use to anyone, because they tend to cling to a worldview that has no future, and to perpetuate fatal habits.
In the end, it won't matter what people believe. Events will take over.
I specifically defined doom so that those who are fighting against the tide aren't doomers. It was my definition and I chose it on purpose.
If we can get more people doing what they can instead of just accepting the impending doom, then the events may take a different path. If enough people don't practice sustainable practices then we're doomed for sure. My position is far from some wide-eyed cornucopian optimism. It's just healthier thinking from a positive perspective IMO. If you don't, your potential remedial actions are greatly diminished.