by firestarter » Thu 11 Sep 2008, 08:32:38
The modern Western diet is composed of apprx 20 or so ENGINEERED food staples. The paleolithic diet of nomadic peoples, which went on for apprx 2 million years was composed of primarily plant based, non domesticated animal and non agricultural food sources. This diet had variety that numbered into the thousands.
Those who claim that our ENGINEERED food sources are better standing alone, without supplementation ,are merely parroting the words and intentions of the food industry.
This is not to imply that the supplement industry is not as compromised as that of the food cartel, for it largely is. But with not much effort one can find a happy medium between the two, which admittedly falls short of the plant based diet of old, but works optimally, within its limitations, in a world populated by nearly seven billion eaters.
At any rate, a low calorie, plant based diet (even with the limited variety) along with strategic supplementation will improve ones quality of life immensely--you won't get fat, which is a good start indeed.
Not all supplements are equal, however, relative to their bang for the buck. What I digest achieves, for me, an avid exerciser, all that I desire. Would I function much differently without the supplements? Actually yes. Any active, athletic person who supplements will tell you the same, which is why virtually every athlete, beyond high school supplements their diets.
Those of you who don't exercise and don't supplement, but eat a relatively low calorie, relatively balanced, diet also will achieve benefits that others who don't comply will lack in. Different strokes for different folks. But for the food nazis to chime in that supplementation is largely a waste of time, and that a so called balanced diet is all that is needed for peak performance, I think some more homework is in order for you.
Civilization: the biosphere's skin disease