Thanks all for posting. According to Monte' last post, 74% or 35 polled think there will be a die-off as oil production declines to zero.
Part of my original post, was to address the issue of how those who believe that, respond to their conclusions. If they have extra money kicking around, are they invested in oil stocks?
I'm just trying to get a handle on who is supporting the oil paradigm and why. It seems that religious fundamentalists who drive hummers and believe in the rapture, would also invest in oil stocks, rationalizing in their own way. It's philososphically consistent.
If peak oilers are doing this too, AND they aren't strong environmentalists, it's also somewhat consistant.
THE MILLION DOLLAR QUESTION:
Are there people posting here who are both strong environmentalists AND shareholders in oil companies? That is the million dollar question.
It seems to me that it's odd to slam our way of life, our over dependancy on oil, while investing in oil corporations. The only way an environmantalist could do this is if he/she concluded we are completely doomed anyway. I see the extreme Die off scenario, as actually supporting the case for acting in this way and I question it.
THAT is what I'm fighting. Acquiescance to an idea that MAY help to perpetuate the problem.
I have a sense that Monte, due to the work he does and the fact that he is an ardent environmentalist, probably isn't invested in oil corporations. Hey wait, I'll ask him.
Monte, are you invested in oil companies?
