by MonteQuest » Fri 10 Aug 2007, 00:24:03
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shannymara', 'I')t's not necessarily the solutions I have a problem with, it's the power structure that must exist in order to implement them. For about 20 years I thought China's policy was a great idea. Then I learned more about how the world works, and changed my mind.
That, and I still think we should let nature do the job. I think nature would do a better job than we can do. Especially this late in the game.
Also, I don't think there's time to implement such a policy now, even if it was a great idea a few decades ago. I think eco-collapse/climate change is happening so fast that we're already committed to the "default" option.
So, we just decimate the environment to preserve our ability to hate a power structure we may not like?
No one forced us to overshoot. We did it on our own.
And we seem awfully reluctant to take our medicine for doing so.
And we hate the idea that the only ones capable of carrying out such a systematic reduction are those who we don't trust to do it.
We did that on own own as well.
Sounds like the Norsemen who chose to starve rather than eat fish.
We die-off because we hated taking the medicine required for the cure?
What will future generations think of us?
We choose not to act and just passed it over to Mother Nature, because "nature would do a better job than we can do."
Yeah, she may just let us go extinct.
"Nature would do a better job than we can do."
I find that statement just sad and pathetic.
The epitome of the weak excuse for denying responsibility.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."