Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

I understand the non-Doomers now.

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby Ayoob » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 02:16:44

I just got back from visiting heaven on Earth. Bottom line, it's absolutely beautiful. The people are educated, they have every modern convenience and art form, indoor plumbing, symphony orchestras, busses and trains, peace and tranquility in the streets.

These people have never known any kind of civil disturbance. That's why they can't imagine it. It hasn't happened to them yet.

When trouble comes, I don't think they'll recognize it as real trouble and figure somebody will bail them out. Nothing stays bad, it always gets fixed. They'll probably be sitting in their houses having tea and asking themselves why the mugging rate is so high and why the grocery store has been closed for a week. It's just crime. It's just gangs. It's just isolated cases of rape and looting. It's just isolated cases of arson, non-Terror-related. It's just random police corruption. The odd case of starvation. And home foreclosure. They fail to see the common thread.

The exercise of getting myself ready to be self-sufficient has been a real eye-opener. As much time as I spend on self-sufficiency, and as much work and money I allocate to the project, there is ALWAYS more to do. Anyone who expects the government to handle their needs is going to be way behind me in this effort.

Thus, doom.

I understand the Europeans and the Northern Democrats now. I wish you good luck.
User avatar
Ayoob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1520
Joined: Thu 15 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby Narz » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 03:20:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ayoob', 'T')hus, doom.

:lol:

"I saw this stupid fat lady on the bus today complaining about how hard her life is."

Thus, doom.

"More violence in Zimbabwe"

Thus, doom.

"You should have seen the ridiculous so-called story on Fox news last night!"

Thus, doom.

"I read an Economist article the other day about how bio-fuels will save us. Morons."

Thus, doom.

"Matt Saviner says we have 12-18 months 'till 'TSHTF'"

Thus, doom.

Reminds me of the Therefore, God exists page. :D
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby TheDude » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 05:38:34

The Doom[sup]X[/sup] writing on here is largely irrelevant posturing/fantasizing. I'd rather read about possible constructive ways of solving our problems, not what the possible ramifications of them could be. It's just noise. I've better things to do.

This forum's still a good source of energy related news, which is mostly what I come to it for now.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 05:46:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'T')he Doom[sup]X[/sup] writing on here is largely irrelevant posturing/fantasizing. I'd rather read about possible constructive ways of solving our problems, not what the possible ramifications of them could be.


In defense of the doomers:

The fundamental difference between many posters strikes me as a difference between how I will solve this problem versus how we will solve this problem. If some of us do not believe that the problem that we have can be solved but the problem I have can than we should not be critisized too heavily for "posturing." Perhaps you see a way to fix our problem. I do not. As a result I will focus on my problem.

We both are being "constructive" the difference is that I do not believe the team's effort will make any real difference so I am still stuck with my individual problem. Instead of joining the team on something that I believe will fail I am preparing myself for the team's ultimate failure. Those with a similar outlook can learn from one another. We are being constructive to one another.
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby dinopello » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 08:34:05

It's easy to slip into the verbage of "solving" or "fixing" the problem. But, anyone who talks like that and actually believes it, I think is not being realistic and it's what sways me at those times to more doomerish conclusions. There are responses to the consequences of PO that would be helpful I think, but not solutions in the sense that people are thinking when they say that.

The OP was a bit vague about where he was talking about, but I'm not seeing the correlation between a community that has cooperated on establishing art, symphony , train systems and all and one that will not respond well to problems as they arise. Communities that have these things in my experience are ones in which the people are very active and experienced in governing themselves and there is a very high rate of volunteerism and making things happen in response to challenges as they arise.

The communities where apathy reigns do not have these things as their government is allowed to proceed without any active participation or oversight from the people. These tend to be the communities where there is knee-jerk support for the lowest possible taxes (on the presumption it will be wasted or stolen - and it probably will be) and they oppose any cooperative project for the common good (like trains and adequate police and fire service).

Anyway, there wasn't enough info to go on.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby TheTurtle » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 08:44:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'T')he fundamental difference between many posters strikes me as a difference between how I will solve this problem versus how we will solve this problem. If some of us do not believe that the problem that we have can be solved but the problem I have can than we should not be critisized too heavily for "posturing." Perhaps you see a way to fix our problem. I do not. As a result I will focus on my problem.


That is really an astute observation, wisconsin_cur. I hadn't considered that distinction among us before, but I think you are definitely onto something here.
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby Roccland » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 09:58:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'T')he Doom[sup]X[/sup] writing on here is largely irrelevant posturing/fantasizing. I'd rather read about possible constructive ways of solving our problems, not what the possible ramifications of them could be.


In defense of the doomers:

The fundamental difference between many posters strikes me as a difference between how I will solve this problem versus how we will solve this problem. If some of us do not believe that the problem that we have can be solved but the problem I have can than we should not be critisized too heavily for "posturing." Perhaps you see a way to fix our problem. I do not. As a result I will focus on my problem.

We both are being "constructive" the difference is that I do not believe the team's effort will make any real difference so I am still stuck with my individual problem. Instead of joining the team on something that I believe will fail I am preparing myself for the team's ultimate failure. Those with a similar outlook can learn from one another. We are being constructive to one another.


Agreed WC!

My plans involve food for a small family...clothes for a small family...water and cots for a small family.

I do not have the means to help my city or my larger corner of the world.

Ayoob is right...people will starve waiting for someone to help.

So be it...they will starve.

Most everyone who has jumped into the rabbit hole is long pessimissim (read realism)...to be other wise is just plain greedy or brain dead.
500 MPH into a brick wall - me
User avatar
Roccland
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1604
Joined: Sat 16 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby TheDude » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 10:14:56

Individual action is impossible or extremely limited for many people, though. What should a person who rents an apartment and lives 2 miles from a supermarket/3 miles from work do in the face of fuel shortages? Get a job closer to work/supermarket? Plant tomatoes on the ledge - if they have one? Start buying E85? Get an EV? Get a backpack and learn how to hunt deer with a bow?

These people deserve some assistance, don't you think? The "posturing" I was criticizing is from people that seem to eternally wallow in the tragedy of it all, without suggesting any possible solutions - and loudly damning any who do, usually driving them away in the process. The only world they seem truly interested in has a domain name, peakoil.com.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 13:56:15

Look, ignore things like Peak Oil, peak population, world war III, etc that are poised to squish us like that big foot in Monty Python....

Just look at things as they are.

Almost all of us are debt slaves, wage slaves, slaves all around. Very very few of us have the guts to be backwoods hillbillies, Amish, "possum living" (look that up) type people and live off of the grid. The DEBT/WORK grid.

Thoreau noticed this in the early 1800s, same thing back then. His parable of the man who worked for a train ticket to go to the next town as opposed to just fucking walking there.

So ignore the big foot, and see that even if things as they are continue indefinately, preparing for Doom is good for you!
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby Specop_007 » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 14:35:52

The nice thing about being a doomer or survivalist is that I only have to be right once to justify my stance. The optimists have to be right 100% of the time, and if they arent they may possibly die as a result of their unwillingness to plan accordingly for "bad things".

I dont like to play the odds that much, so I plan ahead accordingly.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby mmasters » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 14:47:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'T')he Doom[sup]X[/sup] writing on here is largely irrelevant posturing/fantasizing. I'd rather read about possible constructive ways of solving our problems, not what the possible ramifications of them could be.


In defense of the doomers:

The fundamental difference between many posters strikes me as a difference between how I will solve this problem versus how we will solve this problem. If some of us do not believe that the problem that we have can be solved but the problem I have can than we should not be critisized too heavily for "posturing." Perhaps you see a way to fix our problem. I do not. As a result I will focus on my problem.

We both are being "constructive" the difference is that I do not believe the team's effort will make any real difference so I am still stuck with my individual problem. Instead of joining the team on something that I believe will fail I am preparing myself for the team's ultimate failure. Those with a similar outlook can learn from one another. We are being constructive to one another.


I agree with this, I think we're screwed collectively and individual action is the way to go at this point.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Top

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby holmes » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 15:18:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Drifter', 'T')he problem with selfish, individualistic societies like the US and other countries is that most people and governments in those societies won't work together to try to soften the crash. It's the other way around. A fight to maintain their current lifestyles, at any cost.


The problem with reality is this: In this "collective" utopia that is envisioned by these visionaries really is nonsensical. The issue? Most humans are scumbags and will freeload off those creating and producing things. So in the end you have few that actually input any productivity and massive hoards of lazy "you owe me" types sleazing around on others sweat and muscle. That is the human condition sadly. So in truth for a collective "tribe" to exist the producers must drive off or execute the lazy scumbags. Thats how the indian tribes did it. Drive them off into the wilderness and kill them. we shall see the luxury of propping up all these hackneyed slobs will go away soon enough as oil goes. In the old days weak and crippled and worthless to the collective were killed off or died. reality is on its way.
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby holmes » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 15:24:42

and another reality is this: centralized power corrupts. That government that the socialistpaths cherish is all about power. Their little worshipers they laugh at and will opress asap. its amazing the clever chimpanzees have not realized this yet. Wow are we really this advanced human created by a god? I am seeing big time chimp dna in the hairless chimpanzee.
"To crush the Cornucopians, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women."
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby Twilight » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 16:01:05

Position yourself as you see fit, and you will win or lose.

Campaign for others to position the collective to suit yourself, and you are wasting time.

Simple.

Ocean-going yacht with MREs to last years is not required. Just being ahead of the pack enough.
Twilight
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3027
Joined: Fri 02 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby seahorse2 » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 16:03:52

Yes Ayoob, now you are finally seeing that you will make it. Again, the law of averages, you don't have to be the fastest or smartest, you just have to outlast all those happy go lucky everything is okay jack asses. Just like the old joke about the bear hunters. The hungry bear comes into bear camp. One hunter starts putting on his running shoes. The other hunter says, "why are you doing that? You can't outrun the bear." The other hunter says, "I'm not going to outrun the bear. I'm going to outrun you." So, don't worry about the bear of peak oil, worry about outrunning the others around you. Remember, PO is a people problem, meaning, too many people. Just stay healthier and stay alive, and you will be okay. So, stay fit, mentally sharp, and keep working on your nursing degree which keeps you in demand anywhere in the world, and, you will be okay.

All those dependent on medicines will go first, the sick, old, then all the pets and other bs. Assuming the world doesn't nuke itself to death, most young and healthy should be able to wait this thing out. The vikings did okay, and I suspect we will too.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby Iaato » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 16:11:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'T')he fundamental difference between many posters strikes me as a difference between how I will solve this problem versus how we will solve this problem. If some of us do not believe that the problem that we have can be solved but the problem I have can than we should not be critisized too heavily for "posturing." Perhaps you see a way to fix our problem. I do not. As a result I will focus on my problem.

We both are being "constructive" the difference is that I do not believe the team's effort will make any real difference so I am still stuck with my individual problem. Instead of joining the team on something that I believe will fail I am preparing myself for the team's ultimate failure. Those with a similar outlook can learn from one another. We are being constructive to one another.


Great observation, Cur. I suggest, though, that your perpective is polarized, which may just be a reflection of the country we live in today. Rather than I or We as two different journeys, why not travel both roads? It's easier to see the the path down which I travels, because I can control it. Yet, sustainable systems with less resources by definition require more cooperation amongst the entities. Going down the I road while ignoring the need to build communities and relocalize is not a sustainable behavior. The celebration of American independence is over with.
User avatar
Iaato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1008
Joined: Mon 12 Mar 2007, 03:00:00
Location: As close as I can get to the beginning of the pipe.
Top

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby Pops » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 16:36:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'T')he Doom[sup]X[/sup] writing on here is largely irrelevant posturing/fantasizing.

And what is more, it is posturing for people whose opinion only matters here in Nowhere.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'I')ndividual action is impossible or extremely limited for many people, though.

Sorry, but here I have to say BS.

My Momma said, “Can’t never did anything.”

At 14, she and 2 relatives drove 1.5k miles to cut apricots 12 hours a day for barely enough to eat and made it home with less than $60 and lots of other irrelevant stories for those prone to throwing the towel.

I see Doomers with no plan as preachers,
And Doomers with any plan as teachers.

Just me though...
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby strider3700 » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 18:08:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', '
')
These people deserve some assistance, don't you think?


Deserve? Maybe maybe not. Ignoring that aspect though lets say that it is a nice thing to help others out.

Who's going to be giving this assistance? Where are they going to get the resources to help them out? If I have enough food to survive should I give up some of my food so that someone else that has none gets a little? What if this results in us both not getting enough to survive? Is it worth trading my life to extending their life a little? Why should I give up anything?

Remember the crux of the problem is there isn't going to be enough to go around at our current lifestyles.
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island
Top

Re: I understand the non-Doomers now.

Unread postby wisconsin_cur » Thu 09 Aug 2007, 19:21:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Iaato', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wisconsin_cur', 'T')he fundamental difference between many posters strikes me as a difference between how I will solve this problem versus how we will solve this problem. If some of us do not believe that the problem that we have can be solved but the problem I have can than we should not be critisized too heavily for "posturing." Perhaps you see a way to fix our problem. I do not. As a result I will focus on my problem.

We both are being "constructive" the difference is that I do not believe the team's effort will make any real difference so I am still stuck with my individual problem. Instead of joining the team on something that I believe will fail I am preparing myself for the team's ultimate failure. Those with a similar outlook can learn from one another. We are being constructive to one another.


Great observation, Cur. I suggest, though, that your perpective is polarized, which may just be a reflection of the country we live in today. Rather than I or We as two different journeys, why not travel both roads? It's easier to see the the path down which I travels, because I can control it. Yet, sustainable systems with less resources by definition require more cooperation amongst the entities. Going down the I road while ignoring the need to build communities and relocalize is not a sustainable behavior. The celebration of American independence is over with.


I only have so many hours. I have a young family. I have a 40 hour a week job. When I do look at the weproposed solutions I see nothing with hope of working. Learning to garden, taking care of animals and building community take time and time is of finite quantity. I do I get the most return on time invested? I've made my decision.

But then again I never was a team player. Even my pre-school grade card noted, "Does not play well with others."
http://www.thenewfederalistpapers.com
User avatar
wisconsin_cur
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4576
Joined: Thu 10 May 2007, 03:00:00
Location: 45 degrees North. 883 feet above sealevel.
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron