Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Transportation Infrastructure Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Expressway bridge over Mississippi collapses in Minneapolis

Unread postby lotrfan55345 » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 04:00:22

{thread merged by emersonbiggins}

Image

"At least 60 were injured when part of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis gave way at 1805 (2305 GMT) on Wednesday."


200,000 cars each day use this bridge, main artery between west & east of the Mississippi in the MSP area.

Image

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6927113.stm
lotrfan55345
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis / Pittsburgh

Re: Expressway bridge over Mississippi collapses in Minneapo

Unread postby WildRose » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 04:20:00

I was just watching this on the late-night news. What a nightmare! I understand there are believed to be about 50 cars under the water; I hope all of those people were able to get out of their cars to safety. What a shock, to have a huge structure like that break apart right out of the blue. My thoughts are with all those affected.
User avatar
WildRose
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Expressway bridge over Mississippi collapses in Minneapo

Unread postby TheDude » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 05:10:27

Really messed up. Terrible tragedy, but luckily fatalities are pretty low so far:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')t least 7 die when bridge over Mississippi River collapses

August 2, 2007

ASSOCIATED PRESS

UPDATED AT 9:30 P.M.: MINNEAPOLIS — At least seven people were killed and an unknown number of others injured Wednesday when a four-lane bridge over the Mississippi River collapsed, sending cars, concrete and twisted metal plunging into the river below.

The four-lane Interstate 35W bridge, which spanned the river between Minneapolis and St. Paul, collapsed about 6:05 p.m., during evening rush hour. Minneapolis Fire Chief Jim Clack said in a news conference Wednesday night that at least seven people were dead.

It wasn't immediately clear how many people or vehicles were involved in the collapse, but officials and witnesses estimated that 50 vehicles were dumped into the water and onto the land below the bridge.


The first two things you might ask are referenced in the story, too:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he arched bridge, which was built in 1967, rises about 64 feet above the river.
Workers have been repairing the 40-year-old bridge's surface as part of improvements along that stretch of the interstate, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported on its Web site.

Paul McCabe, spokesman for the Federal Bureau of Investigation in Minneapolis, said the FBI has responded to the collapsed bridge to offer assistance and conduct any investigation that proves necessary. But he said there was “no reason at this time to believe there’s any nexus to terrorism.”


At least 7 die when bridge over Mississippi River collapses

Inspections to Interstate highway structures are pretty lax from what I've heard. Funding shortages. Anybody know more about that?

Keep us posted, lotrfan55345. You're our eyes and ears!
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: Expressway bridge over Mississippi collapses in Minneapo

Unread postby MacG » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 06:20:35

Terrible accident. I wonder if it will be rebuilt?
User avatar
MacG
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1137
Joined: Sat 04 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Expressway bridge over Mississippi collapses in Minneapo

Unread postby Novus » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 07:07:50

Unforunately I think we will see more bridge collapses in the future because most of these 1950s era bridges were built with a short shelf life of less than 60 years. Some are being replaced but many are just being left to rust because we just don't have the resources to replace them all. There was a study done in the state of New Jersey that surveyed all the bridges and concluded that over 600 brigdes would need to be replaced in the next 20 years to prevent a transportation apocalypse.
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread (a post-peak nightmare)

Unread postby frankthetank » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 09:44:27

I know the bridge your talking about down there. I see a quote this morning of some official saying they don't have a "spare bridge" to take all the traffic. This will be a nightmare traffic wise. I'd really be thinking of alternate routes if i had to go anywhere near there. Around here by La Crosse we have 3 seperate bridges that span the Mississippi. Then you have to go 20 miles up or down river to find the next one.

Looks like 4 dead so far and 20 missing.
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread (a post-peak nightmare)

Unread postby eunos » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 10:07:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'A')nyone know how long something like this will take to get replaced??? Not that i use it, but it does look like a lot of others do. Does the state/city/county have to pick up the cost of all the damaged people/cars/trains/etc?


Speaking as a Minneapolitan, my guess (and my guess was surprisingly close to Gov. Pawlenty's estimate as it stands now) is 2 years.

It certainly won't be "a couple of months"
User avatar
eunos
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat 24 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread (a post-peak nightmare)

Unread postby Cloud9 » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 10:17:23

Two years is about right. Some of the bridges taken out by Katrina are still in the works.
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread (a post-peak nightmare)

Unread postby sailsunfurled » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 10:20:43

Image

This is I-10 after Ivan in the bay near Pensacola. All East and West traffic was halted by this. 2007 a new bridge was completed with traffic confined to that bridge while the other West bound bridge is being completed. Just to give you some time scale of how long this takes even with a FEMA fast track slush fund.
User avatar
sailsunfurled
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed 01 Aug 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread (a post-peak nightmare)

Unread postby FoxV » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 10:40:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'y')eah. we don't spend money on boring steel metal crap. We spend money on iphones and wine and fun stuff that makes us feel good right now. goddamnit. so why are you like harshing my mellow with this stuff?

this is all classic signs of a falling empire. Once the majority of heavy infrastructure work is done, later generations just kick up their heels and enjoy the fruits of their father's labour (father's being the parents of the baby boomers who founded the space age and technology age).

Optimist take heed of this. If our basic needs are crumbling around us during the times of plenty, how do you think things will go during the time of shortages? Trillions of dollars to maintain infrastructure AND Trillions of dollars to overhaul society to renewable energy sources? Ain't gonna happen (all this while heading into a financial collapse? Keep Smokin boys)

Btw Canada is no better, particularly Quebec; which invested heavily in a complex highway system in the 60s and 70s. So far there have been three overpass collapses in the Montreal area in the last couple of years
Last edited by FoxV on Thu 02 Aug 2007, 12:26:33, edited 1 time in total.
Angry yet?
FoxV
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1321
Joined: Wed 02 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread (a post-peak nightmare)

Unread postby Eli » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 11:05:29

My City is having relatively good times right now with good tax revenue.

But we cannot pay for more cops our crime rate is climbing, the roads were given a 60% rating around town. Many of them are falling apart right now and we have had a couple of overpasses drop huge slabs of concrete.

We are not an isolated case, this is and will become a massive problem.
Last edited by Eli on Thu 02 Aug 2007, 11:22:51, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread (a post-peak nightmare)

Unread postby Eli » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 11:17:54

double post, and site is running slow today.
Last edited by Eli on Thu 02 Aug 2007, 11:21:42, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread (a post-peak nightmare)

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 11:18:52

Despite what we perceive the future will be, I'd almost guarantee the replacement for this failed 8-lane bridge will be a 12-lane bridge.
Hey, all the projections point to more traffic...
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread (a post-peak nightmare)

Unread postby Eli » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 11:27:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'D')espite what we perceive the future will be, I'd almost guarantee the replacement for this failed 8-lane bridge will be a 12-lane bridge.
Hey, all the projections point to more traffic...


I bet you are correct. That is going to be the other thing we are going to rebuild and invest in this infrastructure despite the fact that it was only viable in a world of cheap oil.

This massive network of highways built for vehicles that run on oil is going to be an albatross.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river
Top

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread [MN Bridge Collapse]

Unread postby RonMN » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 13:21:37

I know a girl who got her legg ripped up in this collapse...She's in HCMC now.

I am absolutely mortified over this!
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread (a post-peak nightmare)

Unread postby basil_hayden » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 13:51:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('IanC', 'S')o, what will it be: spend money to maintain largely automobile-based infrastructure (roads, bridges, viaducts, etc) or reallocate that money to more appropriate technology for a Post Peak future?

I hear (figuratively) a lot of posters on this site bemoaning the fact that we are not preparing for the future by retrofiting our car-based infrastructure ie. not building better infrastructure for bikes, trains, walkable communities. I'm one of those posters. However, we clearly have a choice to make regarding the vast amount of dollars it will take to maintain our current infrastructure. Should we maintain or highways or not? What makes sense for the future?

Be careful how you answer as both paths are frought with challenges!

-Ian


Send all the DOT funds to the "Jet Pack Reasearch Department"!

Connecticut went through this several years ago with the Mianus River Bridge Collapse. Now things are even worse and the next bridge is overdue for collapse, whether it be a highway bridge or an Amtrak bridge (still wooden) along the shoreline.

I think the major issue is how engineers do cost analyses for this type of infrastructure - I see costs to build, but I never see costs to inspect and maintain for its lifetime, nor a replacement estimate at the end of its lifetime.

Just lots of "happy thoughts".

My heart goes out to those negatively affected by this disaster, especially Ron's friend.

Also, this reminds me of that Oakland California deck collapse, where someone on the board calculated how much more oil would be used detouring and in traffic. Usage gets ratcheted up after each event like this.
User avatar
basil_hayden
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1581
Joined: Mon 08 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT, USA
Top

Re: Infrastructure Failure Thread [MN Bridge Collapse]

Unread postby Heineken » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 13:52:21

It's a miracle more people weren't killed.

This is definitely a taste of things to come. Not just for bridges and roads but for the McMansions, Mickey Ds's, malls, bulldozers, office and industrial parks, warehouses, factories, and all the other crap. People build and buy things without grasping the extensive and regular maintenance that is required to stay a step ahead of entropy.

The larger our infrastructure becomes, the greater the maintenance "overhang," and the more rickety the whole structure becomes, especially in the face of PO and other resource constraints and soaring costs.

We're blowing all the money on Iraq while turning a blind eye to situations like our decaying bridges.

Entropy is the ultimate terrorist.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Was the 35W bridge thread banned?

Unread postby vision-master » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 14:37:51

It's gone? Just wondering what happened.
vision-master
 

Re: Was the 35W bridge thread banned?

Unread postby perdition79 » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 14:59:39

it was merged with a similar thread in the "depletion economics" forum.
http://www.thepeoplescube.com/

"We are building a religion; we are building it bigger. We are widening the corridors and adding more lanes."
Cake - Comfort Eagle
User avatar
perdition79
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 553
Joined: Fri 21 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Babylon

Re: Was the 35W bridge thread banned?

Unread postby azreal60 » Thu 02 Aug 2007, 15:06:31

Yeah, I lost it too, because I was going to show my wife it and all the sudden it disappeared. It got combined with an aging infrastructure thread, so it took me forever to find it. Kinda appropriate though, when you think about it.
Azreal60
azreal60
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sat 26 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Madison,Wisconsin

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests