by BigTex » Fri 27 Jul 2007, 11:57:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dhfenton', 'W')ow $.095 during late evening and night time hours seems really high. Is that the toal cost including transmission & distribution? It probably is, and in that case $.05/kWh differential is pretty good, and quite an incentive to use night-time electricity. Have your neighbors switched as well, and how have you changed your usage pattern? Laundry, dishwasher, showers, pool filters at night, that type of thing?
That's the total, total, total cost. I literally take the entire bill and divide it by the number of kwh used to get that per kwh cost. The differential the utility describes is a standard rate of $.075 per kwh and a time of use rate of $.05 off peak and $.10 on peak.
Not only have my neighbors not done it, NO ONE has done it in my area. I am literally one of a handful of people among maybe 400,000 served by my utility who are on time of use. When I call about it, I have to explain how it works to the person on the phone.
I have really only changed a couple of things (other than the timers, which provide modest savings). First, don't use the dryer during peak times. Second, try to plan your time away from the house during the peak times and turn off the air conditioner on the way out. On Saturdays and Sundays I find that it's not hard to just not be home during the peak hours and therefore use almost no electricity. During the week if I eat out a couple of times that takes care of an hour or two of peak time there.
I've already done efficient bulbs throughout the house, radiant barrier in roof, radiant sheathing on house, caulking, weatherstripping, efficient refrigerator, efficient washer, so there aren't a lot of opportunities to reduce usage, but the reduced rate is great.
What the pilot programs for time of use residential metering have found (based on what I have read) is that people who are on it for a test period and then taken off it tend to still see a savings over their pre-pilot program average bill, because the time of use rate structure in itself tends to make people more aware of their usage and more likely to take common sense measures to reduce consumption, which saves them money no matter what plan they are on.
The best example is probably the people who keep their air conditioners on whether they are at home or not. That's just crazy, to me.
I have my electricity and gas through the same utility and the bill is on equalized billing where it is the same every month and resets once a year based upon the prior 12 months' usage. Since starting to really pay attention to consumption, my monthly bill has gone from $422 (2005) to $374 (2006) to $322 (2007) for the current year. We'll see what the time of use plan does when the monthly bill resets next year. My house is 3,000 sq ft and my wife and kids like to stay cool, so these monthly amounts are very impressive to me.
I have a Kill a Watt and it is a good tool for figuring out how much power everything uses (other than big things like dryer, central A/C, etc.). Surprises: how LITTLE power a lot of things use. My late model refrigerator uses barely more than a couple of big lightbulbs. 35 inch Energy Star television uses about 90 watts. Laptop computer--35-70 watts. Efficient lightbulbs DO use their claimed wattage. If it says it uses 9 watts, it usually uses 9 watts.
One area that I think will see explosive growth in the future will be high end central A/C units that are very efficient. More and more building codes are requiring higher SEER units and homeowners and builders are figuring out that a high efficiency unit is both an annuity and a hedge against future price increases in electricity. Unfortunately, my unit is a cheap (and noisy) 10 SEER and it is not cost effective to replace it right now. I have wondered about just replacing the fan motor in the outside unit with a more efficient motor and whether that would be cost effective. The motor on one of the outside units went out recently and the repairman replaced it with what he called a "better" motor (whatever that means), but it is definitely a quieter motor. Maybe someone knows more about this than me and can comment.