by BigTex » Mon 16 Jul 2007, 16:05:20
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('syrac818', 'E')h...I kind of liked the reply. I mean, no disrespect to the original poster.
Peak oil is a reality, no doubt. I am certainly not in denial. But, after visiting this site for years, the general vibe of the peak oil folks has gotten pretty tired.
The world is running out of oil, doom is upon us, we will all be eating cat food if we're lucky.... and that's where it stops. Nothing beyond that.
"Just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic", "Will our future be like Mad Max, or worse?", "The end is nigh", "TSHTF very soon", "The Great Depression will look like a day at Disneyworld", "The sheeple will be the first to go"...
I mean, I must've read these posts and articles well over 400 times, and nothing changes. If you were to compare this forum four years ago to this forum now, there would be very little difference. I get the doom part, we all get the doom part, but what is the next step?
Meanwhile there really is a lot of interesting, progressive things going on with new sources of energy. There are people not just thinking, but actually creating some remarkable, realistic alternatives. I read Green Car Congress every day, and I'm just amazed at how fast things have progressed on this front in just 2-3 years. I know very well there is no magical overnight cure, and there is no seemless transition, but there is possibility. People are looking at the reality of peak oil, and saying "Ok, what do we need to do to meet this challenge?". It's as if everyday there is something new, while everyday here is more of the same. I mean, at the very least, I expect to see some gloating from those of us who have made some nice cash on our oil/energy holdings bought back in '04.
Just my opinion.
Next step is to acknowledge at the mainstream level of society the problem we are trying to solve, and not just on this forum. When you say "people are looking at the reality of peak oil", who do you mean? It's not a large group. Most people perceive alternative energy as a gee whiz kind of technology showcase and potential way to counter the effects of high fossil fuel prices. It is not yet well understood that the alternative energy game may be a life or death proposition for many people. I don't think that's an overstatement.
It will be the realization by the man on the street that this PO thing is a BIG DEAL that will get the Manhatten Project kind of focus and commitment that will be needed to come up with even a potential end game that is not a disaster.
Look at government funding and subsidies for alternative energy and compare it to government funding and subsidies for fossil fuels and it is obvious that there is no urgency at the government level to address this problem.
Look at the CAFE standards in the U.S. Absolutely no urgency there.
Look at the global warming issue and the projected impact of much of the world turning to coal when oil gets too expensive. Not only is no one talking about that one, but people are still arguing about whether global warming even matters.
To the question "what do we need to do to meet this challenge", I think you are going to find that there is not much agreement on what "this challenge" means. The oil cos. will say "this challenge" refers to exploring for oil in more and more exotic places. The developing world will say "this challenge" means being able to buy enough of ANYTHING (oil, coal, firewood) to keep their populations from starving. The OPEC countries will say "this challenge" means being able to sell expensive oil for as long as possible and delaying the development of any alternatives for as long as possible as well. The U.S. government will say "this challenge" refers to securing an adequate supply of fossil fuels to power the U.S. economy and ensure the "non-negotiability of the U.S. way of life."
On this board, you will find that "this challenge" refers not only to coming up with possible solutions to the PO pickle, but also to finding some way of getting people to even understand what the PO pickle is.
I understand how a person who attempts to get his or her friends and relatives interested in the PO issue and start talking about its importance and gets blank stares will, after enough of the stonewall/denial/everything's okay routine, start talking about eating cat food and driving around in his Mad Max car. When individuals see that their community does not appear to be taking sufficient action to address an issue you begin to see those individuals taking steps to protect themselves, sometimes in ways that seem a little silly (backyard bomb shelters come to mind).
You pose your "okay, what do we need to do now?" declaration as if everyone is in agreement that there is a problem. I think that part of what drives people crazy here is that no one seems to want to admit that there is a problem. If you look at the energy policies of major industrialized countries, you will see that the focus and priority for most of them is on securing sources of fossil fuels, not on finding ways to dramatically reduce reliance on them and eventually replace them with something else. I suggest that the most progessive nations' efforts today on this front are token, though Europe is probably about 10 years ahead of the U.S.
In the U.S., the fact is that the oil companies, coal companies, and automobile companies swing a MUCH bigger political stick than the alternative energy companies and the green lobby, and I don't see that changing soon. Until that changes in a meaningful way, the "what do we do now" question will not begin to get any real traction.
I HAVE enjoyed making money in energy investments the last few years. To mangle the metaphor, it's sort of like charging rent for the use of deck chairs on the Titanic.