by JohnLudi » Fri 13 Jul 2007, 07:56:18
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pea-jay', 'S')uperficially, this story is a reflection of black ghetto subculture driving out business. But it is not the cause, not by a long shot.
Detroit started its death spiral as soon as it made its bed with the Automotive Industry. The city grew strong when the industry prospered, reoriented itself to automotive culture and settlement practices. It failed to build even a rudimentary rail system or diversify its economic base and was left holding the bag when the US deindustrialized begining in the 1970s. A whole host of broad changes from globalization on downward drove this.
So what happens to any dying area. The best and brightest leave first. Retirees and the middle class leave next. The working poor leave as well.
What's left? The hopelessly dirt poor, uneducated, and addicts. With no wealth left, the social safety net falls apart and crime fills the void. This is not to say crime wasnt present before, but with a complete collapse of economic activity, crime and canibalization are the only things left. Not literal canibalism mind you, just the stealing of economic activity, physical spaces and tangible items.
I believe places like Detroit are a great window on the physical and social impacts of a decades-long collapse in economic activity. Sure it isnt being driven (completely) by energy related causes but the effect of both will be similar absent some way we can keep our economy growing (or even stable) in the next 50 years.
Two other things about detroit. It contains areas where crime has fallen--not due to any change in policing strategies or new economic prospects. No, the areas have just emptied out to the point where even the criminals have moved on because nothing remains. And it is in some of those areas where farms and gardens have sprouted or wilderness has returned.
What I cannot understand is how most people fail to understand Detroit's current misery is due it position in the overall economy
Thank you for this very balanced point of view. Your synopsis is quite correct in it's essence.
I'm from Detroit. And when I say I'm from Detroit, I mean I grew up IN the city...and yes, on welfare and foodstamps, stealing and knife-fighting (this was before everyone over the age of 10 had access to guns)...and had my family (such as it was) not left for the suburbs I would be dead or in prison by now. Learning to survive in that city was what allows me to have the survivalist's instincts I have now...for that one thing I am grateful.
This is FAR too complex a situation to give it the usual "either/or" way of processing information (that will be one of the various elements of human thinking that will end our civilization in the next 10 or so years).
Detroit (and Pontiac and Flint to the North) wedded itself to the automotive industry as soon as there was one. It was a mono-economy. Poor and uneducated people flocked in droves (mainly from the South) to work in that industry (that is why there are so many caucasians living in places like Warren and Hazel Park who sound like they came from the deep South).
The jobs left...the people stayed...at least the ones without the ability to do much more than work on an assembly line.
Then came crack...and the glorification of ghetto culture.
I was there for much of that. It was fun. Unless you've been part of a situation like that you have no idea what it is like.
In short, the "system" (the employers, the local govenment, and the horrifically shitty educational system) failed the people...and a great many of the people failed themselves. Like people anywhere, they followed the basic human tendency to eat only what they were fed. A welfare culture blossomed there after the auto industry began to dissipate, and multi-generations of ill-educated people allowed themselves to become dependent on it.
There is no one person/type of person/behavior that can be two-dimensionally scapegoated (if you are into things like accuracy and truth). Leftwingers will blame the "evil auto industry", rightwingers will blame welfare mothers. Both of them miss vast portions of the actual reality of the situation.
The auto industry in Detroit had a birth/growth/maturity/death cycle just like any other system or entity. You can't entirely blame them, though they do share part of the blame.
The welfare moms (or whatever easy stereotype you choose) were raised in a dark pit. being fed scraps. If you spend your entire mortal existence in a dark pit, you really lack the intellectual tools to get out of the pit. You can't entirely blame them, though they do share part of the blame.
I was lucky, when I wasn't setting things on fire or breaking into cars, I was reading everything I could get my hands on. That and music and the fact that we left before I was in my mid teens are the reasons why I am not a statistic. Pretty sure I would have done some really terrible things by now...
Can't say the same for most of the rest of the people living there.