Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby KevO » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 03:25:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')OUSTON --
Though the United States is still the world's leading oil consumer, its might in the global petroleum business is dwindling.

Developing countries are locking up a bigger share of the world's oil and gas resources to profit from high prices and fuel industrial growth. Some experts view the shift as an emerging threat to the U.S. economy; others see benefits for consumers, saying an expanding suppliers' list diminishes the impact of any single disruption.

Still others see the shift simply as a reflection of globalization, whereby emerging economies lean on rising financial strength and technological know-how to become tougher competitors.

New research by investment bank Goldman Sachs suggests four countries in particular -- Brazil, Russia, India and China, or the so-called BRIC countries -- are grabbing the most market share from American companies. The BRIC's share of the industry's market value has grown from virtually nothing 15 years ago to more than one third today, while American companies' stake has dwindled from more than half to less than a third.

The biggest factor, most analysts agree, is the

more here
KevO
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2775
Joined: Tue 24 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT USA

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby BigTex » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 10:33:35

I think the U.S. oil companies' drilling and exploration technology will keep them in the game as long as there is a game to be played.

I think the pattern will be as follows: the foreign government will nationalize energy resources, kick the U.S. oil co. out, do its best to suck its oil out of the gorund as quickly as possible until production begins a serious decline. Then they will enter into joint ventures with the U.S. companies to come back in and assist them in recovering what's left of their poorly managed oil fields.

Maybe I'm giving U.S. companies too much credit for exploration and production expertise....the biggest problem for the U.S. oil companies is going to be getting enough petroleum engineers trained to get all of that hard to find oil out of the ground in the next 20 years or so.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby Nickel » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 14:15:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I') think the pattern will be as follows: the foreign government will nationalize energy resources, kick the U.S. oil co. out, do its best to suck its oil out of the gorund as quickly as possible until production begins a serious decline. Then they will enter into joint ventures with the U.S. companies to come back in and assist them in recovering what's left of their poorly managed oil fields.


I don’t think you’ve got the right read on what they mean by developing countries “locking up” oil supplies. As far as I can see, they’re not talking about Third World backwaters with oil padlocking the black liquor cabinet; they’re talking about up-and-coming industrial nations making long-term contracts with oil producers that keep that oil from ever reaching the commodities market.

Oil used to be bought that way till the Arab Oil Embargo in the early 70s. After that, the US, the UK, and others changed the system to pool the oil. It all went into a big open market where anyone could bid on it and everyone had access to it. The idea was that if one producer or handful of producers wouldn’t play ball with you, you’d instantly be able to cover the spread somewhere else… and that producers would openly be competing with one another for the business and undercutting one another, which happens more often than not. Worked well for the West for many years.

The problem is, China in particular sees no reason to play that game. They just cozy up to Venezuela or Nigeria or Iran or, yes, even Canada, smile, offer trade deals, industrial this, military that, aid the other, and they don’t have the odious reputation of bombing the living hell out of everyone two shades darker than Anglo-Saxon, and the deal gets made. Guaranteed exclusive supply of X barrels of oil per year for Y years at $Z a barrel (or €Z a barrel, perhaps?)… that’s the way we used to do it. That means less and less oil is available to the open market that we’ve being benefiting from for 35 years or so. Other countries are beginning to follow suit and jump ship from our system, going back to one-to-one contracts with suppliers.

It also impacts the US dollar, because right now, what’s principally keeping it alive and kicking is that it’s the only currency you can use to buy oil in that open market. That means everyone who has to buy oil in it has to have US dollars, which increase the demand, which means they have to sell goods to the US to get them… at whatever the US is willing to pay. It’s not that the US is so much more fantastically productive than the rest of us or better managed, it’s just that it has the monopoly on ‘Oil Coupons’. But since private contracts could be denominated in anything, they don’t automatically require payment in US dollars, which lowers the demand for them. Less demand for US dollars means less value per dollar (and there are trillions of them out there, hidden from sight in central banks as reserves); less value per dollar means fewer people will invest in US-denominated assets because they don’t hold their value over time. A Canadian who invested traded $1.50 Canadian in 2002 to get $1 US still has that $1 US… but five years later it’s now worth $1.05 Canadian, 70% of what he invested. Similar statistics can be told for the euro and the pound, among others.

Obviously, petroleum producers have got to be asking themselves why they should continue to sell their limited, non-renewable resources for a currency that doesn’t even hold its value, but is currently shedding value at a disquieting rate. I believe the one-to-one system is the quiet indication that the world is abandoning the US dollar as its sole, maybe even primary, reserve currency. Time will tell.
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby BigTex » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:10:41

Nice post. Very informative.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby BigTex » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 15:11:23

delete
Last edited by BigTex on Thu 12 Jul 2007, 14:35:08, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby Kingcoal » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:03:18

The only thing that Nickel didn't touch on is that more and more of the oil left is difficult to extract and/or of low quality. Venezuela is finding that while China has a lot of money and is a good customer, they don't have the technology and expertise to extract this kind of oil. For that, you have to look to the big oil companies, most of which are based in North America or Europe. Even in the Middle East, the local oil companies are generally manned by professionals from BP or some other western oil company. If Exxon, for example, had free reign in the Middle East, there would be maybe ten times the number of holes in the ground/water. The developing countries where most of the decent oil is left have a dismal record for exploiting their resources. Generally, they let western oil companies find the easy stuff, kick them out and just milk the existing wells. They’ve been able to do this because they have a lot of huge fields. If they were smart, they’d be investing in exploration and new drilling. Instead, they divert the proceeds from their existing wells into social programs, etc. While some might consider that noble, it’s stupid from a business standpoint and not sustainable as the wells peak. Chavez, for example, is destroying the oil business in Venezuela.

The big oil companies still have a bright future ahead of them. As for the rest of us...
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby Nickel » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:39:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'T')he only thing that Nickel didn't touch on is that more and more of the oil left is difficult to extract and/or of low quality. Venezuela is finding that while China has a lot of money and is a good customer, they don't have the technology and expertise to extract this kind of oil. For that, you have to look to the big oil companies, most of which are based in North America or Europe.... The big oil companies still have a bright future ahead of them.


I’m dubious as to the impracticality of anyone but well-heeled Westerners being able to get at ‘difficult’ oil. Let’s be frank here; we’re not talking about building the first warp engine. We’re talking about getting oil out of the ground and separating it from whatever extraneous material it comes up in. It’s not exactly rocket science… in fact, it’s not even rocket science… and China’s put a man in space already, only the third country on Earth ever to do so. I really don’t think they’re going to have to come crawling to us to turn muck into gasoline. People have been pumping oil out of the ground for over 150 years now. If it’s getting trickier, I still think most countries are equal to it; after all, necessity is the mother of invention, and she’s notoriously fecund.

When I was born — so I’m told — the common opinion was “Jap = crap”. But that came as news to me when I heard it, because well before I started high school, Honda was eating GM’s lunch and Sony had RCA on the ropes. Tomorrow is not today, and these things can turn around with startling rapidity if the will is there. And this oil we’re talking about — the will is there. History is strewn with wilted laurels that were rested on too long, and “big” is no guarantee of survival. Ask a stegosaurus… if you ever meet one.
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby cube » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 16:52:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nickel', '.')..
It also impacts the US dollar, because right now, what’s principally keeping it alive and kicking is that it’s the only currency you can use to buy oil in that open market. That means everyone who has to buy oil in it has to have US dollars, which increase the demand, which means they have to sell goods to the US to get them… at whatever the US is willing to pay. It’s not that the US is so much more fantastically productive than the rest of us or better managed, it’s just that it has the monopoly on ‘Oil Coupons’...
Totally disagree. I never did like the "petro-dollar" theory.

I believe that ultimately it's not the fact that nations buy US dollars that matters it's whether somebody on this planet decides to hold onto US dollars.

example:
Suppose Europe buys US dollars and then imports oil from the Middle east. I agree this creates demand for US dollars and thus props up it's value but the story doesn't end there!

Now that the Middle East has these US dollars what do they do with it? If they hold onto it then the dollar gets propped up and the story ends there. However if they dump the US dollars onto the open market in exchange for something else to store their savings (for example gold) then that would diminish the dollar's value.

see what I mean? Ultimately it's not whether oil importing nations have to buy US dollars to get oil that really matters....it's whether somebody on this planet decides to hold onto US dollars.

my 2 cents.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby XOVERX » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 17:02:03

The Chinese paradigm -- nation to nation oil contracts -- is exactly what the US must move to immediately.

Unfortunately, the US is so tied to the economics of capitalism (which works very well in most instances) that it is doubtful that it will turn to direct national contracts in time to avoid a serious oil contraction in the fairly near future. Say, one to three years.

One of the results of capitalism is to exploit resources as quickly as possible when prices are considered to be "high". With the depletable resources, such as oil, such accelerated usage is a huge problem to sustainability instead of leading to a desirable outcome. Except as to profits.

And so the US must increasingly turn to overt warfare if it is to secure oil supplies. Not unlike the Japanese prior to WW2 when the US elected to use oil supplies as negotiating "leverage" with the Japanese.

If there is any chance to think our way out of the probable nightmare of PO, then the world must stop the unsustainable patterns of wasted oil and gas usage.

Put another way, it is time for the great car culture of America to come to a screeching halt. At least insofar as such vehicles operate via hydrocarbon combustion.
User avatar
XOVERX
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue 18 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby strider3700 » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 18:20:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('XOVERX', 'T')he Chinese paradigm -- nation to nation oil contracts -- is exactly what the US must move to immediately.


The US has already partially done this. A percentage of the canadian oil goes to the US period. I wouldn't be shocked if it's the same for mexico. This was all part of NAFTA.
shame on us, doomed from the start
god have mercy on our dirty little hearts
strider3700
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2865
Joined: Sun 17 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Vancouver Island
Top

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby Nickel » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 19:39:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'I') never did like the "petro-dollar" theory.


It's not a theory, it's a fact; since Kissinger convinced Saudi Arabia to accept only US dollars in payment for oil, and Saudi Arabia prevailed upon OPEC to follow suit, and all three major exchanges accept payment only in US dollars, that's been the lay of the land since about 1973. The US dollar, having abandoned the gold standard, is now effectively backed by the world's oil.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'N')ow that the Middle East has these US dollars what do they do with it? If they hold onto it then the dollar gets propped up and the story ends there.


That's what the US counts on, every hour of every day... that their major export these days, little green pieces of paper, will vanish from circulation into central banks' reserves as a hedge against runs on their currency (that would cripple their ability to purchase oil). Until the euro arrived in 2002, there was no other currency in the world with the economic base to carry that load. This is one of the reasons we're seeing a sharp decline in the US dollar in recent years.

What central banks are doing now is looking around the US for things to buy out from under them... things that will hold value in exactly the same way the dollar doesn't.
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America
Top

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby Kingcoal » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 20:12:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nickel', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'T')he only thing that Nickel didn't touch on is that more and more of the oil left is difficult to extract and/or of low quality. Venezuela is finding that while China has a lot of money and is a good customer, they don't have the technology and expertise to extract this kind of oil. For that, you have to look to the big oil companies, most of which are based in North America or Europe.... The big oil companies still have a bright future ahead of them.


I’m dubious as to the impracticality of anyone but well-heeled Westerners being able to get at ‘difficult’ oil. Let’s be frank here; we’re not talking about building the first warp engine. We’re talking about getting oil out of the ground and separating it from whatever extraneous material it comes up in. It’s not exactly rocket science… in fact, it’s not even rocket science… and China’s put a man in space already, only the third country on Earth ever to do so. I really don’t think they’re going to have to come crawling to us to turn muck into gasoline. People have been pumping oil out of the ground for over 150 years now. If it’s getting trickier, I still think most countries are equal to it; after all, necessity is the mother of invention, and she’s notoriously fecund.

When I was born — so I’m told — the common opinion was “Jap = crap”. But that came as news to me when I heard it, because well before I started high school, Honda was eating GM’s lunch and Sony had RCA on the ropes. Tomorrow is not today, and these things can turn around with startling rapidity if the will is there. And this oil we’re talking about — the will is there. History is strewn with wilted laurels that were rested on too long, and “big” is no guarantee of survival. Ask a stegosaurus… if you ever meet one.


Sorry if I offended you, but you just can't put together an oil company out of inexperienced people, just ask Chavez. Sure, you aren't dealing with rocket science, but it is a highly refined technology and hard won secrets are not shared. There are a million and one little things that experience teaches you (and you'll learn that once you get a job) that aren't exactly spec'd out in a textbook. Non conventional crude (which is the oil I'm talking about) is an infant industry and the big oil companies have all the experience.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Top

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby Nickel » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 22:04:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'S')orry if I offended you, but you just can't put together an oil company out of inexperienced people


Countries have oil; China has a phenomenal balance of trade. How hard do you think it will be for them to get experienced people?
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America
Top

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby BigTex » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 14:47:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nickel', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kingcoal', 'S')orry if I offended you, but you just can't put together an oil company out of inexperienced people


Countries have oil; China has a phenomenal balance of trade. How hard do you think it will be for them to get experienced people?


If building intellectual infrastructure were as easy as getting out the checkbook, China's commitment to put a man on the moon in like 20 or 30 years would be something they could do in one or two years: just hire everyone away from NASA and pay them whatever it took.

It's the same with the intellectual infrstructure that the big oil companies have. It's not something that you can recreate quickly by spending money.

As for the point that oil extraction is not rocket science, when I look at all of the natural hurdles one must overcome to get oil from the bottom of the ocean, the middle of the jungle, or under a sheet of ice and all of the political hurdles one must overcome in many of these same situations and then all of the logistical hurdles one must overcome to get the oil from the extraction point to the refinery, and then from the refinery to the consumer, and to try to do these long term projects profitably with oil price volatility, if it's not as complex as rocket science it's got to be close.

Extracting oil from Spindletop was not rocket science, but poking holes in the bottom of the Caspian may be.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby Nickel » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 14:58:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')f building intellectual infrastructure were as easy as getting out the checkbook, China's commitment to put a man on the moon in like 20 or 30 years would be something they could do in one or two years: just hire everyone away from NASA and pay them whatever it took.


Yes, they should do things with home-grown talent, like the US did with its moonshot using good-old American know-how from good-old Americans like Werner von Braun. You just can't import talent like that. And of course, we all know that oil extraction is all about national pride... you can't insult those guys with money; they'll have none of it. Money and oil don't mix.
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America
Top

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby TheDude » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 15:11:56

What does Hugo plan to do now that he's kicked out all the foreign companies? Maybe outsource all of his talent from, I don't know, China? Could work it into a trade deal. "Brains for barrels." Assuming the Chinese do have some experience extracting and refining heavy oil.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby BigTex » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 15:19:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Nickel', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I')f building intellectual infrastructure were as easy as getting out the checkbook, China's commitment to put a man on the moon in like 20 or 30 years would be something they could do in one or two years: just hire everyone away from NASA and pay them whatever it took.


Yes, they should do things with home-grown talent, like the US did with its moonshot using good-old American know-how from good-old Americans like Werner von Braun. You just can't import talent like that. And of course, we all know that oil extraction is all about national pride... you can't insult those guys with money; they'll have none of it. Money and oil don't mix.


I think you are misunderstanding me. If China wants to go to the moon or build a big oil company or clone Panda bears I say go for it (including hiring anyone they can get to work for them), it's just that for whatever reason the big integrated oil companies have historically proven to be better at discovering and extracting oil than the national oil companies. Based upon that history, I'm not sure that a Chinese national oil company is going to have a different experience.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland
Top

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby Nickel » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 15:20:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', 'W')hat does Hugo plan to do now that he's kicked out all the foreign companies? Maybe outsource all of his talent from, I don't know, China? Could work it into a trade deal. "Brains for barrels." Assuming the Chinese do have some experience extracting and refining heavy oil.


If they don't, it's a safe bet they can afford to pay someone who does.

Who would have imagined that 20 years ago? How times change...
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America
Top

Re: U.S. oil companies' influence is waning

Unread postby Nickel » Thu 12 Jul 2007, 16:47:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'i')t's just that for whatever reason the big integrated oil companies have historically proven to be better at discovering and extracting oil than the national oil companies.


Well that's as may be; but there's nothing in that point (unsubstantiated, I might add) that necessarily disqualifies China, or Venezuela, or anyone else who isn't Exxon, BP, or Shell from getting the job done. This is just jingoism. Ha ha, [place racial epithet here]s can't get the job done; they'll come crawling back... Yeah, well, we'll see, I guess.
User avatar
Nickel
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1927
Joined: Tue 26 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: The Canada of America
Top


Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests