by Nickel » Wed 11 Jul 2007, 14:15:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', 'I') think the pattern will be as follows: the foreign government will nationalize energy resources, kick the U.S. oil co. out, do its best to suck its oil out of the gorund as quickly as possible until production begins a serious decline. Then they will enter into joint ventures with the U.S. companies to come back in and assist them in recovering what's left of their poorly managed oil fields.
I don’t think you’ve got the right read on what they mean by developing countries “locking up” oil supplies. As far as I can see, they’re not talking about Third World backwaters with oil padlocking the black liquor cabinet; they’re talking about up-and-coming industrial nations making long-term contracts with oil producers that keep that oil from ever reaching the commodities market.
Oil used to be bought that way till the Arab Oil Embargo in the early 70s. After that, the US, the UK, and others changed the system to pool the oil. It all went into a big open market where anyone could bid on it and everyone had access to it. The idea was that if one producer or handful of producers wouldn’t play ball with you, you’d instantly be able to cover the spread somewhere else… and that producers would openly be competing with one another for the business and undercutting one another, which happens more often than not. Worked well for the West for many years.
The problem is, China in particular sees no reason to play that game. They just cozy up to Venezuela or Nigeria or Iran or, yes, even Canada, smile, offer trade deals, industrial this, military that, aid the other, and they don’t have the odious reputation of bombing the living hell out of everyone two shades darker than Anglo-Saxon, and the deal gets made. Guaranteed exclusive supply of X barrels of oil per year for Y years at $Z a barrel (or €Z a barrel, perhaps?)… that’s the way we used to do it. That means less and less oil is available to the open market that we’ve being benefiting from for 35 years or so. Other countries are beginning to follow suit and jump ship from our system, going back to one-to-one contracts with suppliers.
It also impacts the US dollar, because right now, what’s principally keeping it alive and kicking is that it’s the only currency you can use to buy oil in that open market. That means everyone who has to buy oil in it has to have US dollars, which increase the demand, which means they have to sell goods to the US to get them… at whatever the US is willing to pay. It’s not that the US is so much more fantastically productive than the rest of us or better managed, it’s just that it has the monopoly on ‘Oil Coupons’. But since private contracts could be denominated in anything, they don’t automatically require payment in US dollars, which lowers the demand for them. Less demand for US dollars means less value per dollar (and there are trillions of them out there, hidden from sight in central banks as reserves); less value per dollar means fewer people will invest in US-denominated assets because they don’t hold their value over time. A Canadian who invested traded $1.50 Canadian in 2002 to get $1 US still has that $1 US… but five years later it’s now worth $1.05 Canadian, 70% of what he invested. Similar statistics can be told for the euro and the pound, among others.
Obviously, petroleum producers have got to be asking themselves why they should continue to sell their limited, non-renewable resources for a currency that doesn’t even hold its value, but is currently shedding value at a disquieting rate. I believe the one-to-one system is the quiet indication that the world is abandoning the US dollar as its sole, maybe even primary, reserve currency. Time will tell.