by MrBill » Mon 09 Jul 2007, 03:56:35
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DantesPeak', 'P')aging MrBill -
I'd like to see what MrBill thinks of this Euro zone expansion from his unique view point within Cyprus, but the moderators say he will be away for a few weeks.
I just got back from Egypt last night, but cancelled my business trip to London this week.
RE the Cypriot pound to the euro. This has been in the works for a long-time.
Basically, when the original 15-countries joined the EU (at various dates) they won exceptions to various core EU programmes, like the UK from the euro.
However, this does not extend to the last 10-members that joined the EU in 2004 like Cyprus and Malta. They are committed to 'ever closer political and economic union' of which fulfilling the Maastricht Criteria of EMU is one.
Slovenia has already joined the euro last year. Lithuania was for all intents and purposes ready, but were blocked as their inflation was a tick higher than the euro average. That was to be expected due to faster growth as the Baltic states play catch-up with core EU states.
Cyprus has had the pound linked to the euro for two years now. This is also a criteria. So the Cypriot pound was still in circulation, but the rate was fixed to the euro. Now on January 1st, 2008, pound notes and coins will disappear and be replaced by euro notes and coins just like in the rest of the eurozone in 2001. Those legacy currencies were linked to the euro in 1999.
Anecdotally, I think the Cypriots have linked their own currency to the euro at too high a peg.
One, most of the inward investment in Cyprus is linked to real-estate development and building. That can dry up anytime. Especially as it is linked to Russia and high commodity prices.
Second, European products on the supermarket shelves are already pricing out local products. If the CYP is too strong it opens a window for lower priced EU goods to flow in without too much competition.
For example, the EU already not only pays EU producers of wine to take land out of production, but they also buy wine and turn it into industrial alcohol at a loss. Economics would dictate that it is cheaper to sell that wine in Cyprus rather than destroy it or turn it into pure alcohol.
EU wines are already under-selling local wines, which are in many cases just as good for drinking. I fear that the trend of turning agricultural land into real-estate developments can only continue if you destroy the margins for farming.
Thirdly, retail space is not only cheap in Cyprus, but retail space tends to turn over very rapidly. It seems many stores stay in business for less that 6-months to a year before they close their doors. That may because there is not a lot of spending power here if most of the inward investment is in real-estate - second homes, vacation properties and retirement villas. Older people who are already established do not necessarily need to buy a lot to support the local furniture stores for example. They are usually savers, not spenders.
So I think Cyprus will struggle with a strong peg against the euro. It will be very hard for them to export from Cyprus in any case. On the other hand a strong currency is anti-inflationary, so they should avoid the problems of Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece of inflation resulting from the switch to the euro.
From a wider perspective many new entrants to the EU are having trouble to fulfill some or all of the Maastricht Criteria, and in any case they should not be in such a rush to join the EMU because the euro takes away the flexibility of monetary policy. Fast growing countries that are developing faster than the mature economies of western Europe do not necessarily want to anchor themselves to a strong euro if it limits their ability to adjust to internal and external shocks to their country's competitiveness.
All in good time. What is important is that they work towards the monetary and fiscal stability as embodied in the Maastricht Criteria that limits budget deficits to 3% of GDP, total debt to 60% of GDP and inflation no higher than 1-2% above the EMU average. These are all laudible goals and worth doing in their own right. ERM takes away some sovereignty of individual member countries, but it also imposes discipline on them, while curbing populist politicians with their spending.
Italy, Greece, Spain and some others would not qualify (by a long shot) for EMU (euro) membership if they had to apply today, so many new members are already in better financial shape than some legacy countries. There is a lesson in that.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.