Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Mad Max Scenario Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby TheDude » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 13:34:27

I believe the future will be more Canticle For Lebowitz than Always Going Home. More Threads than Children of Men. In a hard crash it isn't hard to do the math - look around you and wonder what you're going to do, no fuel, no electricity. Multiply by your local population. Doubt there'll be time to install Telescreens for every Outer Party resident of Airstrip One.

Whether TPTB will still have their intact gated strongholds with electricity and other comforts remains to be seen. At least the Bushes will have that monster aquifer in Paraguay. They're Planning For the Future. Possibly the remaining Haves will fence off a US state or two and hold on to what they have. Texas has always been at war with California!

I don't doubt that the political machinations Orwell wrote of could still be implemented in a society that holds on to some of its authority and energy - the Two Minutes Hate and perpetual war.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby MattSavinar » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 14:38:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattSavinar', ' ') The day those supply lines and energy flows reach certain tipping points, TPTB won't even be able to answer the phones let alone engage in massive Orwellian command and control schemes. In other words, the future is more likely to be a low-energy, chaotic dystopia like "The Road Warrior" than a high-energy, fascist dystopia like "1984".

Monte, AS long as BAU continues, the police state tactics will increase. . . But Blackwater, Dyncorp, and the NSA are as dependent on the 3,000 mile supply lines as Wal-Mart.
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 15:10:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattSavinar', ' ')Monte, AS long as BAU continues, the police state tactics will increase. . . But Blackwater, Dyncorp, and the NSA are as dependent on the 3,000 mile supply lines as Wal-Mart.

And you see no ability for TPTB to control supply lines or to direct power from the grid to keep them on-line?
We have those systems in place for nulcear war, do we not?
Please clarify.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby MattSavinar » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 15:59:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattSavinar', ' ')Monte, AS long as BAU continues, the police state tactics will increase. . . But Blackwater, Dyncorp, and the NSA are as dependent on the 3,000 mile supply lines as Wal-Mart.

And you see no ability for TPTB to control supply lines or to direct power from the grid to keep them on-line?
We have those systems in place for nulcear war, do we not?
Please clarify.

Even the systems they have in place to attempt to keep things going are themselves subject to the law of diminshing returns.
I don't doubt that TPTB will attempt to keep things running for themselves as long as possible just like Wal-Mart will try to keep itself going. But they will fail before long for the same basic reasons Wal-Mart will fail. The computer system the NSA (or whoever) runs to target people need cheap parts imported from China just like the PC I'm typing this on does.

Yes, they will use force to attempt to keep things coming their way but force too is subject to the law of diminshing returns. If was a simple as that the NSA wouldn't already be running into electricity problems.
If Aaron hadn't screwed up my post by deleting the graphs maybe the point would be easier to visualize.
I'd post a link but Aaron will just delete it. Oh well.
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby MattSavinar » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 16:01:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattSavinar', ' ')Monte, AS long as BAU continues, the police state tactics will increase. . . But Blackwater, Dyncorp, and the NSA are as dependent on the 3,000 mile supply lines as Wal-Mart.

And you see no ability for TPTB to control supply lines or to direct power from the grid to keep them on-line?
We have those systems in place for nulcear war, do we not?
Please clarify.

Put another way: it's not that I see "no" ability. I see a "continually diminshing ability."
Consider the attempted US sponsosred coup of Chavez in 2002. Forty years ago the CIA would have ousted a guy like Chavez without breaking a sweat. But nowadays despite having a lot more money, technology, and force at their disposal they've been unable to remove him.
http://www.peakoil.org
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 16:14:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tanada', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EnergyUnlimited', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwell

Status quo - Orwell - neofeudal slavery (soft landing)
Status quo - Mad Max - neofeudal slavery (hard landing)

I hate the way you're thinking, but I beleive you have the core of the matter well understood. Authoritarianism is the ultimate winner.

I can only hope, you don't hate me in person, I am quite a OK guy, I don't walk around wearing helmet with swastika on... :)
Yes authoritarianism is the most likely system to emerge in our near future.
Well, we will live through it.
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 16:30:14

You're forgetting the militas and national guard. For instance, such localized paramilitary commanded much of colonial America's need for fascist police state controls. The Army needs its 3000 mile supply lines for fighting organized conflict 3000 miles away.

But, for instance, it draws on a localized network of military and Guard bases across the country. In my town, for instance, a state capital, there is a National guard armory situated a half mile from the legislative building, and multiple military bases within 100 miles. In an hour, the governor could summon 100,000 (thats hundred thousand) Neo-Nazi Rangers to do their bidding... with bradleys, A-10s, F-22s, etc. The supply line is shorter than one might think.

Who controls SPR? Who has a parallel supply line capacity, who has the organizational structure to adapt and react to changing situations? I think you underestimate the capabilities of the military.

In any kind of post-apoc. scenario, the military will have a huge advantage, even autonomous units, in part due to command and control. Its ability to telegraph force at extreme distances might be diminished, but its capabilities in North America, the continental US, in particular, will not be diminished.

As for the main bases of command and their power needs, small scale nuclear generation, when they figure out it is needed, will be implemented. The policy of nuclearization and the end of oil has been a part of official military planning since the end of WWII. To that end, much of the Navy uses nuclear fuel.

In my capital, there was an armed uprising after a series of general strikes by unionists and "communists" in the 10s and 20s, precipitating the establishment of the Guard Armory. Today it mainly serves as a training platform, but its fortress-facade conceals a very real cache of weapons and ammo.

So I really don't understand why you are suggesting that an organization, with a history and current experience establishing and maintaining supply lines, isn't going to be viable when precisely those skills are required in the future.

Throughout history, whenever the military required something- food, shelter, fuel, ammo, it simply seized it. The mechanisms exist for a sustainable military. Even at the expense of the larger society or economy. If Mad Max is the future, having a gun and a rank is going to be the possible employment.

There are no real counterforces against military power. Americans like to think that their small arms and Eagle Scout skills will somehow keep the military from taking over. I think that is patently ridiculous. 3/4 will hand over their young men, weapons and resources without question. The rest will be annihilated, their weapons pried from their cold, dead fingers.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby chris-h » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 16:44:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', 'I') cannot help but find those words (“degeneracy of our government”) somehow very prophetic

This government is perfect if you are filthy rich !!! CNN
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')uffett said he makes $46 million a year in income and is only taxed at a 17.7 percent rate on his federal income taxes. By contrast, those who work for him, and make considerably less, pay on average about 32.9 percent in taxes - with the highest rate being 39.7 percent.
88822-88822=0
chris-h
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon 11 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 17:41:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattSavinar', ' ')Put another way: it's not that I see "no" ability. I see a "continually diminshing ability."

Ok, I'm on board with that.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby Tricks » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 18:06:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'N')o matter what most of us are doomed, or children, or grandchildren. An elite group of wealthy individuals might keep going for awhile, but even they will have to give up their addicition to oil someday. Maybe by then that moon base will be built. In the long run, hunting and gathering is probably where we are headed. I think farming may be doomed...all it did was increase population.

There can be no hunting and gathering in the long term if the environment is constantly crippled for short term gains. I believe that many animals worth eating could even be driven to exinction in some places. I don't think there will ever be a balance like there was in prehistory.
User avatar
Tricks
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun 22 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby ColossalContrarian » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 18:13:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BlisteredWhippet', 'T')here are no real counterforces against military power. Americans like to think that their small arms and Eagle Scout skills will somehow keep the military from taking over. I think that is patently ridiculous. 3/4 will hand over their young men, weapons and resources without question. The rest will be annihilated, their weapons pried from their cold, dead fingers.

This is an interesting point but I wonder how many soldiers would turn their weapons on civilians? It really takes ALL soldiers being on the same page, just one soldier could disagree and toss a nade into a group of their own comrades (this has happened before.) I could imagine a rift developing between military units and law enforcement when their muzzles are turned toward fellow American’s and family members. Just how long could the military hold things together in all places in the US at the same time?
ColossalContrarian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1374
Joined: Tue 20 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby TheDude » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 20:04:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BlisteredWhippet', 'W')ho controls SPR? Who has a parallel supply line capacity, who has the organizational structure to adapt and react to changing situations? I think you underestimate the capabilities of the military.

How does the military in the PNW get that fuel, though? SPR is stored in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi. They're planning to expand it though - will the additional oil be stored in other parts of the country?
I'm curious what these plans you say the military has to contend with diminishing fuel in an extreme (Catastrophic?) emergency.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s for the main bases of command and their power needs, small scale nuclear generation, when they figure out it is needed, will be implemented. The policy of nuclearization and the end of oil has been a part of official military planning since the end of WWII. To that end, much of the Navy uses nuclear fuel.

What about domestic power? Is there an Operative name for seizure of domestic power generation?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n my capital, there was an armed uprising after a series of general strikes by unionists and "communists" in the 10s and 20s, precipitating the establishment of the Guard Armory. Today it mainly serves as a training platform, but its fortress-facade conceals a very real cache of weapons and ammo.

We were going to secede in the late 30s, too. No need to be allusive BW, you've alluded to where you live here before. You're doing it right now too. Go Wobblies!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o I really don't understand why you are suggesting that an organization, with a history and current experience establishing and maintaining supply lines, isn't going to be viable when precisely those skills are required in the future.
Throughout history, whenever the military required something- food, shelter, fuel, ammo, it simply seized it. The mechanisms exist for a sustainable military. Even at the expense of the larger society or economy. If Mad Max is the future, having a gun and a rank is going to be the possible employment.

Again, why Threads is a much more plausible bit of fiction than Mad Mel. The UK troops in that are very unlikeable, at the end we see that they've still got enough electricity to blast Johnny B Goode on their stereos while shooting looters.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here are no real counterforces against military power. Americans like to think that their small arms and Eagle Scout skills will somehow keep the military from taking over. I think that is patently ridiculous. 3/4 will hand over their young men, weapons and resources without question. The rest will be annihilated, their weapons pried from their cold, dead fingers.
Until they can't reload their cartridges anymore, or their assault rifles break down for good. You make a good point that they may hunker down for a long haul. If it all really keels over we're definitely headed for Dark Ages one way or another, whether facing the barrel of a gun or a battle ax made out of a car body doesn't matter much.
Wonder if anyone's projected the miliatry's fuel needs over time, sans any meddling domestic usage.
Cogito, ergo non satis bibivi
And let me tell you something: I dig your work.
User avatar
TheDude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4896
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: 3 miles NW of Champoeg, Republic of Cascadia
Top

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby eric_b » Sun 01 Jul 2007, 20:25:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BlisteredWhippet', 'B')ut, for instance, it draws on a localized network of military and Guard bases across the country. In my town, for instance, a state capital, there is a National guard armory situated a half mile from the legislative building, and multiple military bases within 100 miles. In an hour, the governor could summon 100,000 (thats hundred thousand) Neo-Nazi Rangers to do their bidding... with bradleys, A-10s, F-22s, etc. The supply line is shorter than one might think.

That assumes there's food and fuel available for those supply lines -big assumption, especially after a few years of famine and mayhem.
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us
Top

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Mon 02 Jul 2007, 02:18:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheDude', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BlisteredWhippet', 'W')ho controls SPR? Who has a parallel supply line capacity, who has the organizational structure to adapt and react to changing situations? I think you underestimate the capabilities of the military.

How does the military in the PNW get that fuel, though? SPR is stored in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi. They're planning to expand it though - will the additional oil be stored in other parts of the country?

Simply and efficiently is the short answer. A military state has the power to stop consumer use of oil and gas, appropriate the equipment, and engineer production. There are military SPRs all across the country. More could be created. Say the military mandates curfews rations gas and oil. At the same time, it takes surplus from the production rigs. In the PNW, that means commandering the Alaskan pipeline.
Even in a scenario where oil is piped from the SPR to the PNW, its feasible to imagine the collaboration between local military and national military units to transfer fuel, say from Louisiana to California.
Where can oil be stored? America is an enormous user of fossil fuels and the means to store and transport them is not a significant problem. Tanks and Tankers of all kinds abound.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m curious what these plans you say the military has to contend with diminishing fuel in an extreme (Catastrophic?) emergency.

I read a war department publication for the Naval academy, written shortly before the creation of nuclear powered vessels. It plainly and logically laid out the implications of the strategic imperative of controlling the end of the fossil fuel endgame- the construction of nuclear power facilities and fuel systems, and securing of the remaining fossil fuel resources.
Soon after WWII saw the creation of a nuclear powered Navy... carriers and sub especially. I have no doubt NORAD is nuclear powered.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s for the main bases of command and their power needs, small scale nuclear generation, when they figure out it is needed, will be implemented. The policy of nuclearization and the end of oil has been a part of official military planning since the end of WWII. To that end, much of the Navy uses nuclear fuel.

What about domestic power? Is there an Operative name for seizure of domestic power generation?[/quote]
"Operation Hugo Chavez"... I don't know. But the militarization of resources and production isn't without precedent.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o I really don't understand why you are suggesting that an organization, with a history and current experience establishing and maintaining supply lines, isn't going to be viable when precisely those skills are required in the future.
Throughout history, whenever the military required something- food, shelter, fuel, ammo, it simply seized it. The mechanisms exist for a sustainable military. Even at the expense of the larger society or economy. If Mad Max is the future, having a gun and a rank is going to be the best possible employment.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here are no real counterforces against military power. Americans like to think that their small arms and Eagle Scout skills will somehow keep the military from taking over. I think that is patently ridiculous. 3/4 will hand over their young men, weapons and resources without question. The rest will be annihilated, their weapons pried from their cold, dead fingers.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'U')ntil they can't reload their cartridges anymore, or their assault rifles break down for good. You make a good point that they may hunker down for a long haul. If it all really keels over we're definitely headed for Dark Ages one way or another, whether facing the barrel of a gun or a battle ax made out of a car body doesn't matter much.
The military is supposed to be ready to fight two international wars. I would assume that would be enough ammo to take care of policing its own back yard. Bullet making is an easy business.
There are other aspects of technological dependence. Integrated circuits, batteries, high-tech stuff, etc. But for a military on a pirate binge, its like going shopping for free. Lets say they have to go to China for some of their hardware. Quid pro quo. After all the Chinese military will probably have their own resource problems. We supply guns and coal. Perhaps we'll reinforce our trade with nuclear submarines in the China Sea.
But lets suppose it comes down to axes and swords. Again the military's command and control structure survives. What it will look like, I don't know. Perhaps they will form another mounted cavalry, and forged swords by controlling the last remaining coal mines, which they press prisoner/slaves into working. Everyone else gets a protein wafer and works a vegetable garden.
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby Battle_Scarred_Galactico » Mon 02 Jul 2007, 05:48:11

I personally think this is the most interesting question regarding PO, the future of the military.
I'm torn between the two arguements, I'm sure the military will be the last thing standing, I just can't see them bothering with anything not vital to them. I see gated areas and 'green zones', much like Iraq today.
---
Battle_Scarred_Galactico
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby kevincarter » Mon 02 Jul 2007, 08:55:07

Really interesting thread.
My point is, you can’t change economical factors in any given society and expect that society to remain almost the same. PO will affect economy at large, so large changes are coming ahead.
IMO first thing to worry about is the existence of an everlasting enemy.
You don’t need much energy to keep a tyranny going, just ID cards, check points, secret police, purges, travel permissions and the like.

There is in fact a guy that has been screaming to the wind for years, Alex Jones, he says that there is a plan to merge the police and the military to turn the US into a police state. He says the army is already training to control Americans, going to small towns and rehearsing the take over local powers. The tactics are to get hold of the police station first and the official buildings next, then get as many collaborative youth as possible gathered up, put them in white t-shirts and make them take their bicycles and mark the houses that have guns in town, then go house by house making searches and taking the guns, arrest those who resist etc, they rehearse all that with volunteers. He has a good documentary about it, I'll try to put the link if I find it. He even tells the case when they did one of those rehearsals in a small town without warning the local police, two soldiers tried to disarm the sheriff and he kill them both, he didn’t know it was a drill. Apparently its a true story.

In this rehearsals/drills they use paid actors so that the army gets used to hear things like "what are you doing we are Americans" "you can't arrest me" "you can't take my guns" etc... Quite scary shit.
Edited to add link police state 2000, Alex Jones
kevincarter
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 426
Joined: Thu 04 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby gg3 » Mon 02 Jul 2007, 10:54:13

Sabibay (sp?), "nade," interesting, I've never heard that one before (from friends who are in right now); when were you in? (I'm going to guess mid 1980s.)
TheDude: "Mad Mel" heehee, that's good...
Aaron: I had no idea NSA's power shortage was so bad that they're having internal revolving blackouts. Oh boy does that suck, you don't want those guys, or any part of our national defense, to be blacked out. Those are the conditions that hostile foreign powers just love to take advantage of. Fort Meade needs a nuclear plant, a pebble bed modular reactor would be perfect, and would jump-start private investment in same for civilian utilities. BTW they don't get their heavy iron from China.
---
About the military.
For at least the last seven years, there has been ongoing debate among both commissioned officers and enlisted ranks, about the following:
"What would you do if the part of your oath about obeying the C-in-C came into conflict with the part about defending the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic?"
The implicit message here is, the Deserter In Chief and Five-Deferment Dick don't respect the Constitution. And the informal empirical results so far are that about 30 - 40% of uniformed military would defend the Constitution, another third or so would defend the Regime, and the rest would either choose in the moment or try to sit it out.
The implication I take from that is, a substantial portion of our uniformed military will stand with the citizens and against a rogue regime. And thus the 2nd Amendment becomes relevant: that 30-40% of the military, plus the citizens, add up to enough to effectively deter or defeat a tyrannical regime.

And let's not forget the lessons of Iraq either; that even a disorganized and decentralized insurgency can win a defensive war on its home turf.
This is not to say that scary cases, such as those "training exercises" involving taking over American towns, should be downplayed. I should go look up the reports &c on that subject and do some reading. And clearly there is a need for countermeasures of whatever kind, because something of that sort is clearly illegal as hell and so the elevant question isn't "whether" but "how" to oppose it and stop it.
---
The entire picture changes if our Constitutional republic breaks down or splinters into quasi-independent territories.
---
These kinds of scenarios are why I keep emphasizing that it's so darn important to teach people to revere the Constitution, respect the law, and prefer a peaceful and orderly society to one where it's every "man" for "him"self.
A nation of laws not of men, is highly syntropic (negentropic, counter-entropic if you will) and as such it takes much hard work to build, maintain, and defend, and fairly little effort to degrade and destroy. You do not want to live in a world where the courtroom is replaced by the dueling ground or the ducking stool. We have already seen what happens when a small number of people in the White House have contempt for the Constitution and the law, and we shall soon see them turned out of office via the next election or via impeachment. But cleaning up the damage they've done will take years if not decades, and meanwhile other shit will be hitting the fan.

It's usually thought of as cool or hip to talk about secession and the breakdown of the republic, but you really do not want to go there. You don not want to be separated from your family by state borders much as Germans were and Koreans still are. You do not want to wake up in the middle of the night wondering if pressing the Send button on your last bad mood might be enough to put you in front of a firing squad or in chains in a slave brigade.
I promise you this, and you can take it to the bank: If the republic breaks and the Constitution is no longer the law of the land, you will regret the day it happened until the day you die.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby bshirt » Mon 02 Jul 2007, 11:53:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'I')t's usually thought of as cool or hip to talk about secession and the breakdown of the republic, but you really do not want to go there. You don not want to be separated from your family by state borders much as Germans were and Koreans still are. You do not want to wake up in the middle of the night wondering if pressing the Send button on your last bad mood might be enough to put you in front of a firing squad or in chains in a slave brigade.
I promise you this, and you can take it to the bank: If the republic breaks and the Constitution is no longer the law of the land, you will regret the day it happened until the day you die.

Nope, I don't think so.
The Constitution has been gang raped so frequently the last century or so it's simply a relic only.
Fiat money? Driver's license requirements? Property taxes? I could go on forever. What could possibly be "more" unconstitutional?
Right this very moment it's possible to be jailed by the SS Gestapo via the Patriot act (and others) by hitting your Send button transmitting non-centralized control statements. You very well may not even be allowed a thieving lawyer to represent you either. Constitutional???
Nahhh, gg3, I say bring on the balkanized US. I'll gladly take my chances with local authority than the jack-booted thugs/scum in Washington DC.
User avatar
bshirt
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Sat 23 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby basil_hayden » Mon 02 Jul 2007, 12:07:50

The future will be more like the movie Brazil, where the Buttles pay for what Tuttle was up to.

Brazil movie

The tubes, hoses, wires and ducts everywhere in that movie are so cool.
User avatar
basil_hayden
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1581
Joined: Mon 08 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: CT, USA

Re: The future will be more akin to Mad Max than George Orwe

Unread postby coyote » Mon 02 Jul 2007, 12:30:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('basil_hayden', 'T')he future will be more like the movie Brazil, where the Buttles pay for what Tuttle was up to.
Brazil movie
The tubes, hoses, wires and ducts everywhere in that movie are so cool.

Absolutely... anyone who hasn't yet seen Brazil, make it a priority. It's brilliant.
Think 1984 meets Monte Python. Brazil trailer
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron