by eastbay » Mon 04 Jun 2007, 00:16:34
I reviewed the pictures you linked. Bodies in a city morgue and a few people with bloody shirts is what one can see in any large city on earth just about any night of the week. There were no pictures of troops with guns ready or drawn. Some guy ran over by a tank reminds me that standing in front of a moving tank is a bad idea.
The bullets shown appear to be what is probably the most common round on earth, the 7.62 x .39. They're standard Chinese AK 47 rounds, but interestingly the bullets shown with them were obviously fresh and undamaged. They were unfired. So why would anyone show a handful of unfired rounds and call them bullets troops had fired? Most people wouldn't know the difference, that's why.
Beijing at that time was a city of around 10 million. The few pictures we've seen could be anything. They could have been pictures of a small portion of the day's traffic fatalities. They could be of people beaten after stoning soldiers or police. Stoning soldiers or police is a very bad idea. We simply do not know what caused the injuries or why they occurred.
The evidence is completely lacking. What we see are a very few pictures of bloody hair and shirts. We see a morgue image. This is what could be seen just about anywhere. It could be from factional fighting. It could be anything. In many large Asian cities serious traffic accidents involving bicycles and motorcycles are commonplace.
Again, we simply don't know what caused the injuries displayed, but until someone finds clear and convincing evidence, it's improper to claim a 'massacre' occurred. Accusing people of committing a 'massacre' is a very serious charge requiring absolute proof. A few bloody images and a collection of phantasmagoric tales are obviously insufficient.
Got Dharma?
Everything is Impermanent. Shakyamuni Buddha