by pea-jay » Sat 19 May 2007, 05:44:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('undertaker', '
')So now we have this multicultural mess, and Whites better adapt by adopting the same kind of racial solidarity that every other race has. This isn't "Leave it to Beaver" land anymore where we could take a White majority for granted. Now we have to put aside the sports teams, and take up a new sport -- extreme racial demographics football! We have to learn to cheer when White babies are born and White communities increase their percentage, and boo when . . . well, you get the picture.
Multicultural mess? Try over population mess. Sure cultural clashes arent pretty and for some people superficial differences mean everything. But multiculturalism doesnt cause traffic, global warming or was responsible for using up half the planet's oil and disrupting virtually every habitat on the planet. Over population did that.
Too many white kids
Too many black kids
Too many asian kids
Too many ... well you get the point.
And while on average some places have higher population growth rates than others, the ones with the lowest rates have the largest impacts. A white family of 4 living in rural north dakota has a greater impact on the environment than a rural Mali family of 8. Population and consumption...thats what matters.
What the society is comprised of in terms of skin type, not so much...
Though, I do agree when resources get tight, the backlash can take on an ethnic/racial aspect under the right conditions. It may do so again in the future in some areas and maybe not in others.