by pea-jay » Mon 14 May 2007, 02:39:21
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'E')xcept it is an anthropological fact that hunger periods (famine) for agriculturists have always been more severe than hunger periods for hunter-gatherers. Farming does not keep you from starving, it just makes starvation more sudden and more severe.
Ummm... actually you have that exactly backwards Ludi. One of the main benefits that the development of agriculture bestowed was the ability to produce a
surplus of food that could be stored against periods of drought and famine, enabling a larger percentage of the population to survive such vicissitudes.
You are theoretically correct. But that surplus has allowed the rise of a ruling class to oversee the production and use of that surplus. And therein lies the real problem. Not the concept of agriculture per se but the application of it. Plus the continuous existence of surplus allowed countless cultures to grow dependent on them until the inevitable decline left them vulnerable to starvation.