911 was so obviously an inside job
ignoring the physical evidence ..
Bush lied about when he first saw the first plane hit the tower
The drills running on that day which crippled NORAD
The fact that Dick Cheney was running Norad and the drills
The fact that no planes were intecepted
The fact no one lost their jobs due to errors or incompitence
Bush's brother was running security at the WTC buildings until the day of september the 11th
The ISI connection .. lead hijacker wired 100,000 dollars ?
The trading on the stock market which was NEVER investigated
The obscene amounts of warnings they recieved about 911 which were all ignored. (The FAA had 52 warnings in the 3 months prior to 911. Look it up .. )
The fact they lied about the fact they could have never invisioned people flying planes into buildings, even tho they had done loads of drills about this. Even 11 months before 911 they did a drill where by they simulated a plane crashing into the pentagon (Mascal drill).
Or the blatent obvious cover up.
Was over 400 days before Bush setup the 911 commission, and he only set it up due to massive pressure. Bush and Cheney refused to testify at first and when they did they would only testify together behind closed doors and no written records were to be kept of the meeting. Or the fact that Henry Kissinger or Philip Zelikow were put in charge of the 911 commission... lol i mean come on.
At the very least one can only assume the Bush administration knew of the attacks then did nothing given the evidence.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Feb10.html
Put it this way, the government has lied about everything else, WMDs etc etc. Given the fact the 911 commission was not indipendant, how can it be trusted ?