Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

What do you think will happen?

Poll ended at Sun 17 Apr 2005, 16:12:50

It is impossible to know because the premise could be wrong. URR is not known and speculation at this stage is futile
1
No votes
Your premise is wrong. Campbell and others have been wrong many times before and they are likely to be wrong again
2
No votes
Some other event (terrorism, major US recession) is likely to kick in before we hit the production peak, thereby pushing out the peak date
5
No votes
Energy prices will rise to a high enough level as to spur a huge push to alternates. More questionable reserves will be exploited and demand will be forced to stay in check with supply
5
No votes
Energy prices will rise at significant rates, which in conjunction with other factors (such as raising interest rates) will lead to a significant global recession
22
No votes
Energy prices will rise at hyper inflated rates leading to a depression
7
No votes
Once the cat is out of the bag (PO well known), all hell breaks loose as countries scramble for resources.
8
No votes
 
Total votes : 50

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby Newsseeker » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 08:55:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'W')e are much more frugal than most people, but the cost of things is going up so fast that any amount of frugality can't cover it. The next things to go, garbabe pickup and the newspaper on weekends will hurt. I can take the garbage up to the dump, but the newspaper is nice. Oh, well, I suppose it could be a lot worse. 2007/8 seems to be the breaking point for us. We'll move into ultra frugal mode next winter.


Sorry to hear that. Best of luck to you guys in your noble effort to have a decent standard of living. It probably doesn't help that real wages have been falling since the 70s. Good luck!
Newsseeker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu 12 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby Revi » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 09:01:31

We are already somewhat self-sufficient. We cut our own wood and eat from the garden, make maple syrup and harvest hot water whenever the sun shines on our solar panels. We have back up PV solar LED lighting if the electricity becomes too much to pay for. We are ready for a crash if it happens. We'll just hunker down. It won't be that different from how we live now. The thing that will really hurt is not having money for the movies on Friday nights. We won't have to cut that for a while I hope...
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Tue 20 Mar 2007, 17:25:36

See if you can scrounge day-old newspapers, I've noticed the news does not change THAT much. For up to date stuff, get a radio. If you're out in the boonies learn to build a loop antenna so you can get the AM stations better.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby PrairieMule » Wed 21 Mar 2007, 19:39:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'S')ee if you can scrounge day-old newspapers, I've noticed the news does not change THAT much. For up to date stuff, get a radio. If you're out in the boonies learn to build a loop antenna so you can get the AM stations better.


Or better yet, buy a Grundig short wave for $30 at radioshack. In 2006, I listened to more sw than am and tv news combined. I just attached a anntena boost for $24, makes all the difference.

I'm middle class and I feel the slide on a daily basis. You could probably put a yardstick measured by month and watch my standard of living decline.

On the flip side, at 37, I'm mentally tougher and my value system is completly different than seven years ago.
If you give a man a fish you will have kept him from hunger for a day. If you teach a man to fish he will sit in a boat and drink beer all day.
User avatar
PrairieMule
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2927
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a Nigerian compound surrounded by mighty dignataries

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby Revi » Wed 21 Mar 2007, 22:34:56

I just read an interesting thing by Thomas Paine, of Common Sense fame. He said that there are three ways of paying for a war. One is to pay outright. (yeah, right!) The second is to tax people, which is the best, because they are aware of what they are paying for it, and the third is to print money, and make inflation. This is a tax only on the working class. People who make money off their money live off the increased interest. Us working stiffs feel our wages shrink as the price of everything goes up. The government does okay, because they just keep printing money for whatever they need. It struck me that even though Paine's words were penned over 2 centuries ago, they are common sense today.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby Newsseeker » Fri 23 Mar 2007, 09:15:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'I') just read an interesting thing by Thomas Paine, of Common Sense fame. He said that there are three ways of paying for a war. One is to pay outright. (yeah, right!) The second is to tax people, which is the best, because they are aware of what they are paying for it, and the third is to print money, and make inflation. This is a tax only on the working class. People who make money off their money live off the increased interest. Us working stiffs feel our wages shrink as the price of everything goes up. The government does okay, because they just keep printing money for whatever they need. It struck me that even though Paine's words were penned over 2 centuries ago, they are common sense today.


Yeah, there aren't too many options to pay for a war. What our goverment does is worse than printing money because they sell T-bonds to our rivals (China) and then leave the next generation to pay for it. I read a book entitled "The Coming Generational Storm" and it said that if we wanted to make Social Security solvent we would have to tax 70% of income right now. Combine this with the Iraq war funding and our trade deficit and it is not a pretty picture.
Newsseeker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu 12 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 10 Apr 2007, 00:31:07

The more the US borrows, the less our currency is worth.

Our currency reflects this by falling in value against other currencies.

The dollar has fallen against the Euro by almost 50% since the Euro was established in 2000.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby MrBill » Tue 10 Apr 2007, 02:50:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')he more the US borrows, the less our currency is worth.

Our currency reflects this by falling in value against other currencies.

The dollar has fallen against the Euro by almost 50% since the Euro was established in 2000.


The euro was launched in 1999 at $1.1900 and it is now $1.3440. That is approximately 13% weaker.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby Plantagenet » Tue 10 Apr 2007, 13:46:16

The Euro was PROPOSED in 1999, but only traded on the currency market as a theoretical currency. It wasn't on the streets until a couple of years later.

It wasn't much of a launch in 1999 as you could see a picutre of one, but you couldn't get a Euro or spend a Euro anywhere in Europe in 1999....Only the banks had them....get it?

It was lira, marks, franks, zlotys, krona from the English Channel to the Aegean Sea.

I lived in Europe at that time and dealt with U.S. dollar to Euro conversions frequently. When I bought my local currencies, I'd get lira or whatever and the receipt would also show the exchange value of the theoretical Euro. The Euro hit a low of .84 then and is currently 1.3440.

Do the math Mr. Bill......1.344 is more than 50% higher then 0.84.

CHEERS!
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby MrBill » Wed 11 Apr 2007, 03:10:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')he Euro was PROPOSED in 1999, but only traded on the currency market as a theoretical currency. It wasn't on the streets until a couple of years later.

It wasn't much of a launch in 1999 as you could see a picutre of one, but you couldn't get a Euro or spend a Euro anywhere in Europe in 1999....Only the banks had them....get it?

It was lira, marks, franks, zlotys, krona from the English Channel to the Aegean Sea.

I lived in Europe at that time and dealt with U.S. dollar to Euro conversions frequently. When I bought my local currencies, I'd get lira or whatever and the receipt would also show the exchange value of the theoretical Euro. The Euro hit a low of .84 then and is currently 1.3440.

Do the math Mr. Bill......1.344 is more than 50% higher then 0.84.
CHEERS!


Then that is what you should have said. If you are going to measure from the troughs to the peaks then you can of course make your points more dramatic based on selective data. Just be honest about it.

Also, not to be pedantic, but the euro was proposed in 1992, became a reality in 1999, and notes & coins were issued in 2001. The euro hit its low at $0.8225 in October 2000.

The zloty was and remains an independent national currency naturally. Although there has been a great deal of convergence with the eurozone fundamentals due to their commitment to meet The Maasctricht Criteria adopted by the rest back in 1992 even if current members of the euro are not as commited to the same fiscal responsibility as the would be new comers are forced to be now.

However, the US dollar (-19%) may be undervalued against the euro (+19%), but as you are an expert on Europe because you used to live there, you will know that imports/exports between the USA and the eurozone are very small. It is more useful to look at the value of the US dollar with its actual trading partners.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') The table below shows by how much, in Big Mac PPP terms, selected currencies were over- or undervalued at the end of January. Broadly, the pattern is such as it was last spring, the previous time this table was compiled (see article). The most overvalued currency is the Icelandic krona: the exchange rate that would equalise the price of an Icelandic Big Mac with an American one is 158 kronur to the dollar; the actual rate is 68.4, making the krona 131% too dear. The most undervalued currency is the Chinese yuan, at 56% below its PPP rate; several other Asian currencies also appear to be 40-50% undervalued.

The Big Mac index

Clearly, the US dollar is undervalued against the NOK, the Icelandic kronor and even Sterling (+21%), but what about all those other 100+ currency pairs out there? Like the CNY (-56%) or the JPY (-40-50%). I do not want to be accused of measuring from trough to peak, so I will admit I am using purchasing power parity (PPP) and not nominal exchange rates. I could also use trade weighted exchange rates that would tell a similar story. However, if you like we could measure nominal exchange rates against the US dollar and then take an average as opposed to only looking at the USD against the EUR and pretending that it tells the whole story?

Caveat. I own more euros than US dollars, so it really does not bother me that the US dollar is declining. Just so you know.

But here is a more theoretical question. If one country's (A) share of world trade goes from less than 5% of total to over 15% of total over a period of time, while another country's (B) share remains roughly equal at 20%, what SHOULD happen with the trade weighted value of the two currencies A vs. B? Should A's appreciate or depreciate against Bs?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')hina's share of world GDP is nearly four times more than it was in 1980. Measured at purchasing-power parity, it approaches that of the world's rich countries, and in 15 years may overtake Germany and Japan to become the world's second-biggest economy. China's growing share, and that of the rest of Asia, have come at the European Union's expense.
Enter the dragon

Of course, that is only theoretical because it ignores capital flows, interest rates, inflation, productivity growth, structural problems in the economy, and, of course, money supply growth. Your original point. But one thing each country has totally under their control and that is not affected by external trade is their budget deficits or surpluses. There many other countries have done a better job than the USA at getting their own financial house in order. Another contributing factor to higher interest rates and a weaker US dollar other than money supply (at least in nominal terms).

UPDATE:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')ederal Reserve Bank of New York
President Timothy Geithner said low long-term interest rates are
making financial markets complacent about the risks associated
with the U.S. budget and current-account deficits, the
Sueddeutsche Zeitung reported, citing an interview.
Geithner said politicians don't feel any immediate need to
address the deficits and ``because long-term interest rates are
low, the topic is hardly causing any concern on financial
markets either,'' according to the newspaper.
Geithner said the deficits are not sustainable and the U.S.
needs a positive savings rate at some stage in order to pay back
the money it has borrowed.
Still, global imbalances can't be solved in the short term
with political measures in the U.S., China, Europe and Japan, he
said, according to the newspaper. The U.S. must remain
attractive to foreign capital, Geithner said.

Source: April 10 (Bloomberg) --
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby Plantagenet » Wed 11 Apr 2007, 13:13:50

Hi Mr. Bill:

Your post is very interesting and had a lot of interesting things in it.

1. The "Big Mac" index from the Economist is one of my favorite indices as well.

2. Measuring from the "trough" to the peak makes a great deal of sense. It shows the total grain in the value of the Euro since the trough is more than 50%.

3. You are wrong to suggest I claimed to be an expert in Europe. I simply pointed out that the Euro has gained over 50% in value against the dollar.

4. In terms of your theoretical question, you answered it yourself in your final paragraph. I agree the value of a currency is dependent on other factors then the portion of world trade conducted by that country. Things like the currency supply and the domestic inflation rate in the imaginary country are clearly going to play a major role.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby Newsseeker » Mon 16 Apr 2007, 10:56:48

I agree that the dollar has slid a lot but the euro has pension plans that it is going to have to pay for making it not as great an alternative as it could be. Without PO I'd say that once China floats its currency it would become a reserve currency in 30 years or so....
Newsseeker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu 12 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 16 Apr 2007, 13:03:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newsseeker', ' ')the euro has pension plans that it is going to have to pay for making it not as great an alternative as it could be.


The US dollar has HUGE pension issues to pay for too.....unless you think social security is going to be funded with all the SS tax money that was put into the secret lockbox.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
Top

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby Newsseeker » Sat 21 Apr 2007, 09:42:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newsseeker', ' ')the euro has pension plans that it is going to have to pay for making it not as great an alternative as it could be.


The US dollar has HUGE pension issues to pay for too.....unless you think social security is going to be funded with all the SS tax money that was put into the secret lockbox.


All apologies. Both currencies are faulty but there is no competing reserve currency.
Newsseeker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1126
Joined: Thu 12 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby Plantagenet » Wed 25 Apr 2007, 14:35:47

The easiest way for a non-specialist to see the arrival of the initial effects of Peak Oil will be through ever-increasing prices for gas creating by tightening supply.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... OlUzd30YOo

Oil prices are predicted to hit new record highs this summer in the U.S., exceeding the old record highs established last summer.
_______
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby hubbertspeak7777777 » Wed 25 Apr 2007, 23:37:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')he easiest way for a non-specialist to see the arrival of the initial effects of Peak Oil will be through ever-increasing prices for gas creating by tightening supply.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... OlUzd30YOo

Oil prices are predicted to hit new record highs this summer in the U.S., exceeding the old record highs established last summer.
_______


The cornucopians will keep making excuses like "we pulled through things like this before back in '73." That's what my family members always say when I bring up peak oil.

The funny thing is that most cornies don't even understand that the USA peaked in 1970. It's as if they believe that oil is an infinite resource. Morons.
hubbertspeak7777777
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 26 Apr 2007, 00:39:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hubbertspeak7777777', '
')The funny thing is that most cornies don't even understand that the USA peaked in 1970. It's as if they believe that oil is an infinite resource. Morons.


This is what I run into, if I even try to bring up the subject of peak oil. I've given up.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ
Top

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby hubbertspeak7777777 » Thu 26 Apr 2007, 01:05:40

Fuck 'em. If the cornies want to live in a sugar-coated world, so be it... they're the ones who have to live with the consequences.

The cornies are the kind of people who follow the philosphy of, "who cares if others are starving and unemployed, I've got my mansion and suv, so that means the economy is doing fine." I'll laugh at them when they're eating the leather seats of their suvs to survive. Stupid fuckers.
Last edited by hubbertspeak7777777 on Thu 26 Apr 2007, 01:09:33, edited 1 time in total.
hubbertspeak7777777
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Thu 26 Apr 2007, 01:07:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hubbertspeak7777777', 'F')uck the cornies. If they want to live in a sugar-coated world, so be it. They're the kind of people who follow the philosphy of, "who cares if others are starving and unemployed, I've got my mansion and suv, so that means the economy is doing fine." I'll laugh at them when they're eating the leather seats of their suvs to survive. Stupid fuckers.


You just put in a nutshell exactly how the people around here (san francisco bay area) think. Congrats!
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ
Top

Re: Energy costs and ramifications Post 2007/2008

Unread postby hubbertspeak7777777 » Thu 26 Apr 2007, 01:16:29

Thank you. You Californians have San Francisco, we Michiganders have Bloomfield Hills. I've been to both and most citizens of both cities have the same "I'm doin' fine, so fuck you" attitude.
hubbertspeak7777777
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed 07 Mar 2007, 04:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests