Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Dairy Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 13:27:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', '
')I've been warning about a major food crisis for YEARS now. It now appears that it may happen within the next 2 years.

Buckle up.
Buckle up, but don't stock up on corn syrup! :lol:
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 13:39:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('steam_cannon', 'S')tuff about high fructose corn syrup


Welcome to my personal little pet peeve. Go to the grocery store right now, and pick up any random package of processed food. Now read the ingredients. I bet it lists HFCS, doesn't it?
Sometimes I think I know too much about the ingredients in the foods here. Just about everything has some sort of junk in it. But regarding HFCS, now I have another reason why I like Ukrainian foods more! Most of their sugar comes from beet sugar (sucrose) not corn syrup (fructose)...
By the way, their sunflower Halva is soo tasty! :-D
Last edited by steam_cannon on Sat 31 Mar 2007, 13:48:07, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 13:47:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'I')'ve watched canned peaches increase from about $1 for a 15-ounce can to about $1.39 just in the past year or so. People are grumbling but keep whipping out the ol' credit card. How long can the consumer---the economy---absorb this?
Makes me think of how a couple years ago, some bad storms wiped out a bunch of wheat fields in Ukraine. Then the price of pastas on the shelves there doubled. Prices for food can go high quick. Of course, because of our size we've been insulated from storm damages causing price spikes. But as grain stocks keep running lower and lower our size isn't going to help much.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 15:09:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('steam_cannon', 'I') was reviewing this study on how fructose in corn syrup is metabolized, verses other sugars. Corn syrup is mostly metabolized by the liver and drinking lots of it (like from sodas and food sweeteners) causes changes in the metabolism of fat in the liver, central obesity, and disturbed glucose and insulin metabolism. Basically corn syrup is not good for humans. Because it has to be metabolized by the liver like alcohol, for simplicity you can imagine the effect of a glass of corn syrup soda as the same as drinking a glass of beer, both cause belly fat. So I say let cars or cows have the corn.


Holy leaping conclusions batman.

Yes fructose has to be metabolized in the liver before it's used, but so what. Metabolism is what livers do. The fact that it is metabolized in the liver isn't why alcohol causes liver damage. Alcohol causes liver damage because it's a toxin. Is corn syrup good for people? No. But it's bad for people for the exact same reason that cheeseburgers and french fries are bad for people: nutrient density. Our bodies and our brains are designed for a nutrient poor environment. The amount of calories concentrated in a single McDonalds store, would have, in nature, been spread out over several square miles of forest. It's the same thing that happens with monkeys in a zoo. If you give them a food bucket, they sit around and get fat and dull. If you hide little bits of food here and there in their cages, they become bright and energetic as they search for the morsels.

Fructose, IMHO, is a more healthy way to sweeten foods than is sucrose (table sugar). Fructose is the predominant naturally occurring sugar in fruit, whereas there are few naturally occurring sources of sucrose. Fructose is also sweeter than sucrose, so you get more sweetness for fewer calories.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 15:49:24

Absolutely. Over intake of sugars is bad. To lower your blood sugar, the body produces insulin. Insulin signals your fat cells to take up that sugar, make it into fat, and store it away for future use. The more fat that is already stored in those fat cells, the more encouragement in the form of insulin they need to take up more. Eventually the pancreas gets exhausted from making so much insulin. It can't keep up and the blood sugar goes up. This is called type II diabetes. It use to be called "adult onset" diabetes, but in the era of Cheetos and x-box, we're starting to see it in 10 year old kids.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 17:24:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'H')oly leaping conclusions batman.

I was talking about the very reasonable implications of this study.
http://www.diabetesincontrol.com/result ... ticle=4648
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medical ... wsid=65470

Also, I think you were confused when I said one way to explain the study to someone without a scientific background, would be to say that drinking corn syrup adds organ fat (belly fat) in a similar way as drinking alcohol. Organ fat accumulation is different from skin fat accumulation and both cases involve organ fat accumulation.

The problem the author of the article is talking about, is that when someone adds too much fructose to their diet they mess up their metabolism, accumulate organ fat, and a number of unhealthy side effects. For example, if a person did nothing but eat bananas, that behavior would make them sick, even if as you say they ran all day. People who suck down soft drinks are doing the equivalent of downing a bucket of bananas each day. So the implications of the study sound pretty reasonable put into the context of the American diet.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')he fact that it is metabolized in the liver isn't why alcohol causes liver damage.

Oddly, I said nothing about liver damage. But I did talk about how excess fructose causes (or is implicated in) the accumulation of organ fat which affects multiple organs, not just the liver. And I talked about other medical problems implicated in excess fructose intake.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'F')ructose is the predominant naturally occurring sugar in fruit, whereas there are few naturally occurring sources of sucrose.

There are many ways to answer this:
* Fruit doesn't normally grow all year.
* Animals don't normally eat fruit all year.
* Coca Cola is not fruit juice.
* Sucrose doesn't come from oil.
* Beet sugar is a naturally occurring source of sucrose.

And though it is true that both we and our ancestors have been capable of breaking down many poisons. Monkeys eating fermenting fruit for the alcohol, is a classic example. But just because something is natural that doesn't mean it is good, natural can be bad too. Tobacco can cause cancer, too much sun can cause cancer, and as this study determines: too much fructose can cause illness. And as Americans drink too much fructose the implications should be clear.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 17:29:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'A')bsolutely. Over intake of sugars is bad. To lower your blood sugar, the body produces insulin. Insulin signals your fat cells to take up that sugar, make it into fat, and store it away for future use.
More importantly is that not all sugars are equal.

"fructose-containing beverages presented a pathology similar to metabolic syndrome, which in the short term causes lipid accumulation (hypertriglyceridemia) and fatty liver, and at later stages hypertension, resistance to insulin, diabetes and obesity."

The implications of this study are that fructose-containing beverages cause resistance to insulin more so then other sugars. diabetesincontrol.com has a good article on this.

I say give all the corn to the cows and the cars :roll:
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 17:34:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'F')ructose is also sweeter than sucrose, so you get more sweetness for fewer calories.

Fructose: "The taste is quickly noticeable, but fades out in a moment, as well. Sugar has a more planer, flatter curve of intensity than fructose has over time." http://www.karelma.com/english/body/sugar.html

I prefer cooking with sugar because the sweetness doesn't fade out. Think of it this way. If you cook an apple pie and the first bite is too sweet and the second bite is not sweet enough. What good is that? Consistent flavor is important in cooking. But hey, if you like fructose in your tea, I got no problem with that.
Though I prefer milk(even if it is expensive) and sugar :lol:

Also regarding Fructose being fewer calories per sweetness. I don't think counting calories in cups of tea is a good diet tip. And more importantly, if fructose can damages your metabolism as the study implies. Then it really doesn't matter that it has fewer calories.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 18:06:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('steam_cannon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'H')oly leaping conclusions batman.

I was talking about the very reasonable implications of this study.


OK. Fair enough. Here's the actual study: link Now just reading the abstract, his conclusion seems to wildly overstate the actual science he's done. Whether hepatic steatosis may be linked to excessive fructose does not appear at all clear from the rest of the literature. The authors seem to take it as a given and claim to have conclusively proven that it is a result of this leptin resistance state they found in their rats. This certainly seems to me to be a wild exageration of the facts. Hepatology is a good journal, and maybe there's more to the actual paper than what comes through in the abstract. This strikes me as bench geek stuff. Similar in fact to the sort of bench geek stuff I published in Hepatology as a med student. It's interesting, but it is one jig saw puzzle piece out of thousands.

I certainly wouldn't say this paper proves anything. It is one interesting piece of evidence, but it takes much more to build a comprehensive picture. Rats are not humans, and something that seems clear in one experimental prep, may not be at all clear in another.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here are many ways to answer this:
* Fruit doesn't normally grow all year.
* Animals don't normally eat fruit all year.

This might be true for most animals, but you omit two critical facts. 1. Unlike virtually all other land mammals, humans lack fur. 2. Unlike virtually all other mammals, humans lack that ability to synthesize vitamin C. Both of these facts point strongly to humans having evolved in equatorial areas where fruit was prevalent year round.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '*') Coca Cola is not fruit juice.

Nutritionally, I would say that fruit juice and soda are both best thought of as "candy". Fruit juice, drunk in significant quantities, is just as unhealthy as soda.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '*') Sucrose doesn't come from oil.

Not sure I'm following you on that one. I'd say sugar cane and sugar beet farming use just as much oil as corn.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '*') Beet sugar is a naturally occurring source of sucrose.
Are you proposing that we evolved in a ecological habitat with lots of sugar beets? I know of no such habitat.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 't')oo much fructose can cause illness. And as Americans drink too much fructose the implications should be clear.

That fructose is any more dangerous than sucrose is far from demonstrated. Sucrose, by the way, gets broken down in the intestines into glucose and fructose.
Last edited by smallpoxgirl on Sat 31 Mar 2007, 18:08:06, edited 1 time in total.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 18:07:48

Cows, Hogs and Corn Fed Girls! Oh my!

A better use of fructose might be to fatten up farm animals more quickly. Ironically in the South insensitive people would refer to a fat woman as being "Corn Fed" or "A Corn Fed Girl". This is probably due to farmers experience that corn fed animals gain more weight per calorie then on other feeds.

That brings to mind some interesting possibilities. If a farmer wanted to make a feed using cheap oats but still have their hogs or cows gain weight, the farmer might be able to simply add corn syrup to the feed and induce the same metabolic syndrome as seen in excess fructose intake in these animal studies.

That would make a good product. It might be possible to supplement a small amount of corn syrup to oat feed and have it perform similarly as corn feed for growing hogs... A fraction of the sugar in normal corn feed might be enough and if so it would make a cost effective combination. Also it may be that only occasional dosing of corn syrup or corn feed would be sufficient to induce this metabolic syndrome. Well, those might be some ways farmers could use less corn but achieve the same results.

Mmmm corn!
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 18:26:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('steam_cannon', 'T')he implications of this study are that fructose-containing beverages cause resistance to insulin more so then other sugars. diabetesincontrol.com has a good article on this.


You want to rejoin us on earth for a minute?

The implications of the study are that if you feed a rat, in this one lab in Barcelona, nothing but fructose, it's serum leptin levels go up and it's hepatic fatty acid oxidation goes down. This is not conclusive proof of anything in humans. It is not even proof that Barcelona rats fed only sugar develop fatty liver. It sure isn't proof of some link between corn syrup and obesity. You are extrapolating beyond the data.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 18:38:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'S')ucrose, by the way, gets broken down in the intestines into glucose and fructose.
Rephrasing what you said, "sugar is broken down into half as much fructose". Sounds like we agree. Also because acidic hydrolysis takes time to break down sugar, this means that even though glucose is absorbed more readily then fructose, the over all effect may be that the liver has more time to process the fructose.

"...digested in the stomach into its component sugars, by acidic hydrolysis. This step is performed by a glycoside hydrolase, which catalyzes the hydrolysis of sucrose to the monosaccharides glucose and fructose... ...(a small fraction of) undigested sucrose passing into the intestine is also broken down by sucrase or isomaltase glycoside hydrolases, which are located in the membrane of the microvilli lining the duodenum..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucrose

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'R')ats are not humans
Well, I wouldn't worry about this fact. Few serious researchers find this to be a problem. And from what I know, mice digest food much like humans and have many of the same metabolic pathways as humans. Also using radionuclides(radioactive carbon in sugar for example) you can study precisely in what cells and parts of cells molecules end up in and work out the timing of a metabolic cycle though multiple experiments and dissections. So historically, animal studies tend to work out very well for studying metabolism and drug research.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')his might be true for most animals, but you omit two critical facts. 1. Unlike virtually all other land mammals, humans lack fur. 2. Unlike virtually all other mammals, humans lack that ability to synthesize vitamin C. Both of these facts point strongly to humans having evolved in equatorial areas where fruit was prevalent year round.
Simply humans did not evolve where gallons of cola grew on trees. This is hardly an omission and I would have hardly even have thought it worth mentioning. Also fructose in fruits is absorbed more slowly then refined fructose. This means that an apple is safer for diabetics then a glass of soda.

Your tone seems to be argumentative, so this probably upsets you in some way. I think there are several reasons a person might find a negative study on fructose upsetting. Like because fructose has been suggested for diabetics because it doesn't raise glucose levels. But there are many negative studies on fructose, such as this fairly impressive list: Mineral loss... elevates insulin levels in women on "the pill"... Fructose converts to fat more than any other sugar... http://www.becomehealthynow.com/article/carbs/1170
For a more comprehensive picture: http://www.google.com/search?q=fructose+weight+gain

But seriously, this is just a boring study on corn, cows and people. Nothing to get upset about :razz:
Last edited by steam_cannon on Sat 31 Mar 2007, 22:23:16, edited 6 times in total.
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 18:42:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'Y')ou want to rejoin us on earth for a minute?
Was this argumentative comment necessary? I can think of better if you'd like to know... :roll:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')he implications of the study are that if you feed a rat, in this one lab in Barcelona
The implications are this study is causing a big stir in the medical community and with researchers.

Finding a chemical mechanism like this is like an atomic labratory finding a new element.
"The most novel finding," said Laguna, "is that this molecular mechanism is related to an impairment in the leptin signal. Leptin is a hormone that plays a key role in the body's energy control; among its peripheral actions, it accelerates fat oxidation in the liver and reduces its synthesis."

Also their discovery is consistent with studies on animal feed. So there will be follow up studies and there may be fallout (changing trends). We are all about changing trends here, are we not?
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 21:45:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'A')bsolutely. Over intake of sugars is bad. To lower your blood sugar, the body produces insulin. Insulin signals your fat cells to take up that sugar, make it into fat, and store it away for future use. The more fat that is already stored in those fat cells, the more encouragement in the form of insulin they need to take up more. Eventually the pancreas gets exhausted from making so much insulin. It can't keep up and the blood sugar goes up. This is called type II diabetes. It use to be called "adult onset" diabetes, but in the era of Cheetos and x-box, we're starting to see it in 10 year old kids.


I have given up alcohol, and am not a big fruit freak, I'll still eat bread and noodles, etc but not much of these normal American staple foods. I'm finding my weight is going down, I'm looking better, and weight (flab) is coming off of my middle. All this without any real effort on my part, not going hungry, just being reasonable. I've also set a food budget for myself of $10 a day and as often as not stay within it.

Typical American family meal is the whole fambly going to Round Table Pizza and getting some kind of fambly-meal-deel where they get a couple-few huge pizzas, 99% flour or cheap sugar. And breadsticks, glazed breadsticks maybe, and huge cups of free-refill sodas. Pop tarts or sugary cereal for breakfast. Lunch might be micky-d's or something.

If they cook at home, kraft mac and cheese, or hamburger helper, since the credit cards must be fed first, these wonderful things are often cooked without the milk or meat that's supposed to be incorporated into them. No veggies or Kraft cheese sauce covered broccoli or something. Or macaroni salad, it's salad! And of course lots of soda in any case.

Plus per capita consumption of alcoholic drinks is pretty high in the US.

I was at the farmer's market today, some real monsters walking around or is that waddling/oozing?

I admit, I still drink coffee and am wondering if I should quit that. I'm wondering if there's some sort of cortisol/fat buildup thing going on with coffee.

I do eat corporate food, sadly, fairly often. An oatmeal raisin cookie from the coffee shop, baked at some ADM lab somewhere, or yesterday where I had "Popeye's" chicken. That was a horrorshow...... I got the $5.25 "meal deal" which came to $5.60, had an iced tea instead of the huge cup full of soda, also got corn on the cob, you get artificial butter with that, and a biskit. I ordered it eat-in which means of course I got it to-go, so I took my huge amount of packaging to a table and dug my meal out of it, the plastic bag, folded in half, made a great "catcher" for corn bits and dripping artificial butter. I had my 2 thaighs, and left the biskit in the box and wrappings - the crust on the chicken was enough flour for me. Not a bad little meal, really, but a HUGE amount of packaging went in the trash when I was done. I have no idea what Popeye's has to do with the spinach-loving sailorman, they don't serve spinach, and the music in the place was old blues and even some Satchmo, not bad although I doubt anyone but me noticed. People around me were eating huge meals with U-refill huge cups of soda, wow.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ
Top

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby Heineken » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 22:18:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('steam_cannon', 'I') was reviewing this study on how fructose in corn syrup is metabolized, verses other sugars. Corn syrup is mostly metabolized by the liver and drinking lots of it (like from sodas and food sweeteners) causes changes in the metabolism of fat in the liver, central obesity, and disturbed glucose and insulin metabolism. Basically corn syrup is not good for humans. Because it has to be metabolized by the liver like alcohol, for simplicity you can imagine the effect of a glass of corn syrup soda as the same as drinking a glass of beer, both cause belly fat. So I say let cars or cows have the corn.


Holy leaping conclusions batman.

Yes fructose has to be metabolized in the liver before it's used, but so what. Metabolism is what livers do. The fact that it is metabolized in the liver isn't why alcohol causes liver damage. Alcohol causes liver damage because it's a toxin. . . .


The dose makes the poison. That's true for anything---corn syrup, cyanide, water, Heinekens!

Of course, with corn syrup being in almost everything we eat, the cumulative dose becomes enormous.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby Heineken » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 22:23:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', '
')I have given up alcohol.


I will never give up alcohol. It's highly cardioprotective, not to mention a de-stresser. I see it as a health food when taken in moderation.

I'll never forget a pathologist's noting that every time he did an autopsy of an alcoholic, he was amazed how clean the arteries were. "Like a baby's," he said.

If I had no control over my intake, I'd give it up too, though. But I have iron control over how much I drink (spoken like an alky, right?).
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 22:26:40

"High-fructose corn syrup...
...climbed from zero consumption in 1966 to 62.6 pounds per person in 2001." (Per year)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dy ... ge=printer
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby gg3 » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 23:17:18

About milk:

I haven't seen a significant price increase, but it may be that I'm not paying close attention yet.

The milk I drink is from Clover Stornetta Dairies in Northern CA; they have had a company-wide ban on bovine growth hormone since day one; are generally rated high for clean conditions, humane treatment of herds, and so on. I drive by one of their operations when I go to Mendocino County and what I see is just cows grazing in a great big field on the side of a hill, the way things were 30 - 40 years ago. And the milk really does taste better than generic milk.


About corn syrup in foods:

I like my sweets. Chocolate this, pastries that, baked goods the other thing, and of course nothing beats ice cream on a hot day. Something I've noticed more and more over the past 25 years: After a few days, the icing on pastries and baked goods starts to turn into a clear sticky liquid that makes the stuff get slightly soggy and unappetizing. There are exceptions, such as anything from a real bakery, or higher-end factory products such as Entenman's. But what I suspect is going on here is that corn syrup is being used as a substitute for ordinary sugar, and it's mixed with various things to keep it in a solid form, but after a few days it just goes back to being a liquid. Anyone here know anything about this?


How fructose or corn sweeteners screw up your taste buds:

If the first bite is "very very sweet," it interferes with the homeostatic set-points in your sense of taste. Thus your thresholds rise, in much the same manner as your sense of hearing adjusts to a conversation in a noisy environment. Quickly the sense of "very sweet" is recalibrated back to "ordinary sweet," and the sweetness of other ingredients comes in below the threshold. Thus the entire item tastes less sweet than otherwise.

The most obvious way you can demonstrate this to yourself is: Get hold of some very sweet oranges. Buy a roll of Sweet Tarts candy. First eat a few slices of an orange. Then eat two or three of the orange sweet tarts. Then eat a few more of the slices of real orange, and you will notice that they taste bland and even unappetizing. What's happened is that the intense sweet and sour characteristics of the Sweet Tarts have tweaked your sense of taste.

Now the interesting part is to wait a couple of hours and then have another orange. See how long it takes before your sense of taste readjusts back to normal baseline. Yes, it does take hours.

As for what to do with the rest of the Sweet Tarts: If you have a problem with raccoons in your trash bins, leave a few Sweet Tarts around. The raccoons will find them and eat them, and be unable to taste real food for a while. Might scare them off your trash bins.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: Milk prices leaping: corn-fed ethanol is culprit

Unread postby steam_cannon » Sat 31 Mar 2007, 23:22:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', '
')I admit, I still drink coffee and am wondering if I should quit that. I'm wondering if there's some sort of cortisol/fat buildup thing going on with coffee.

Well, I can tell you about my experience going off coffee. I have been trying the last couple months without it. The first two weeks were awful. Aleve helped with the headaches... But after my head stopped hurting I found that I felt more awake in the mornings and the evenings. In the mornings I really needed a cup to wake up, in the day and in the evenings too. But now I am just awake.

I wanted to try going off coffee because I've found that coffee makes me too nervous. It gets you all excited, your heart going, you can find you're talking too fast. And if I am giving a speech on something, I really don't want to go into it all nervous or rush things. You can't give a good speech if you're nervous. And most of the time when I would have a cup of coffee to relax, it was just out of habit or to get over withdrawal. And that is the other thing I don't much like about coffee, anything that has withdrawal symptoms can't be real good for you.

But hey, nothing against a cup of tea once in a while. A few days a week I might have one, mostly herbal tea as just as something hot. But I understand, some people use it to help them concentrate, I usually just put on some music while I am working if I want to drown things out. When I was a kid I didn't slurp down coffee all the time and I didn't feel I needed to. So I guess I feel like a kid again! :-D

Something amusing though, my wife and I recently to moved to a town full of coffee shops just after I started trying living without coffee. I don't know but I guess that is kind of like moving to a tobacco town just after quitting smoking... :roll:

And sure there are studies showing benefits to drinking coffee, less problems with insulin resistance, lower incidence of alzheimer's disease. But a healthy diet may solve those problems better then guzzling caffeine drinks. Anyway, it's something I'm trying. I'm grabbing a glass of milk more then a cup of coffee now, which I'm sure has added health benefits.

Some interesting milk research: There are a number of studies showing that the fatty acids in whole milk seem to be conducive to weight loss. So it may be that the extra calories of a glass of whole creamy milk, won't go to your waste, as many people think...

More on topic, now I drink milk more but it wouldn't bother me much if milk prices doubled or tripled. But if they went higher then that, I probably wouldn't have milk very often. Of course I wouldn't have coffee more often either :P

And relating to peak oil. Imagine if there were some major blackouts and everyone on your block couldn't make their coffee machine work! It would be day of the living dead! But if you didn't drink coffee at least you could think straight... And I suppose if you were the one person on the block with a percolating coffee maker and coffee, everyone would be your friend :-D
User avatar
steam_cannon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2859
Joined: Thu 28 Dec 2006, 04:00:00
Location: MA
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests