by MrBill » Wed 11 Apr 2007, 03:10:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', 'T')he Euro was PROPOSED in 1999, but only traded on the currency market as a theoretical currency. It wasn't on the streets until a couple of years later.
It wasn't much of a launch in 1999 as you could see a picutre of one, but you couldn't get a Euro or spend a Euro anywhere in Europe in 1999....Only the banks had them....get it?
It was lira, marks, franks, zlotys, krona from the English Channel to the Aegean Sea.
I lived in Europe at that time and dealt with U.S. dollar to Euro conversions frequently. When I bought my local currencies, I'd get lira or whatever and the receipt would also show the exchange value of the theoretical Euro. The Euro hit a low of .84 then and is currently 1.3440.
Do the math Mr. Bill......1.344 is more than 50% higher then 0.84.
CHEERS!
Then that is what you should have said. If you are going to measure from the troughs to the peaks then you can of course make your points more dramatic based on selective data. Just be honest about it.
Also, not to be pedantic, but the euro was proposed in 1992, became a reality in 1999, and notes & coins were issued in 2001. The euro hit its low at $0.8225 in October 2000.
The zloty was and remains an independent national currency naturally. Although there has been a great deal of convergence with the eurozone fundamentals due to their commitment to meet The Maasctricht Criteria adopted by the rest back in 1992 even if current members of the euro are not as commited to the same fiscal responsibility as the would be new comers are forced to be now.
However, the US dollar (-19%) may be undervalued against the euro (+19%), but as you are an expert on Europe because you used to live there, you will know that imports/exports between the USA and the eurozone are very small. It is more useful to look at the value of the US dollar with its actual trading partners.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') The table below shows by how much, in Big Mac PPP terms, selected currencies were over- or undervalued at the end of January. Broadly, the pattern is such as it was last spring, the previous time this table was compiled (see article). The most overvalued currency is the Icelandic krona: the exchange rate that would equalise the price of an Icelandic Big Mac with an American one is 158 kronur to the dollar; the actual rate is 68.4, making the krona 131% too dear. The most undervalued currency is the Chinese yuan, at 56% below its PPP rate; several other Asian currencies also appear to be 40-50% undervalued.
The Big Mac indexClearly, the US dollar is undervalued against the NOK, the Icelandic kronor and even Sterling (+21%), but what about all those other 100+ currency pairs out there? Like the CNY (-56%) or the JPY (-40-50%). I do not want to be accused of measuring from trough to peak, so I will admit I am using purchasing power parity (PPP) and not nominal exchange rates. I could also use trade weighted exchange rates that would tell a similar story. However, if you like we could measure nominal exchange rates against the US dollar and then take an average as opposed to only looking at the USD against the EUR and pretending that it tells the whole story?
Caveat. I own more euros than US dollars, so it really does not bother me that the US dollar is declining. Just so you know. But here is a more theoretical question. If one country's (A) share of world trade goes from less than 5% of total to over 15% of total over a period of time, while another country's (B) share remains roughly equal at 20%, what SHOULD happen with the trade weighted value of the two currencies A vs. B? Should A's appreciate or depreciate against Bs?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')hina's share of world GDP is nearly four times more than it was in 1980. Measured at purchasing-power parity, it approaches that of the world's rich countries, and in 15 years may overtake Germany and Japan to become the world's second-biggest economy. China's growing share, and that of the rest of Asia, have come at the European Union's expense.
Enter the dragonOf course, that is only theoretical because it ignores capital flows, interest rates, inflation, productivity growth, structural problems in the economy, and, of course, money supply growth. Your original point. But one thing each country has totally under their control and that is not affected by external trade is their budget deficits or surpluses. There many other countries have done a better job than the USA at getting their own financial house in order. Another contributing factor to higher interest rates and a weaker US dollar other than money supply (at least in nominal terms).
UPDATE:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')ederal Reserve Bank of New York
President Timothy Geithner said low long-term interest rates are
making financial markets complacent about the risks associated
with the U.S. budget and current-account deficits, the
Sueddeutsche Zeitung reported, citing an interview.
Geithner said politicians don't feel any immediate need to
address the deficits and ``because long-term interest rates are
low, the topic is hardly causing any concern on financial
markets either,'' according to the newspaper.
Geithner said the deficits are not sustainable and the U.S.
needs a positive savings rate at some stage in order to pay back
the money it has borrowed.
Still, global imbalances can't be solved in the short term
with political measures in the U.S., China, Europe and Japan, he
said, according to the newspaper. The U.S. must remain
attractive to foreign capital, Geithner said.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
by Plantagenet » Mon 16 Apr 2007, 13:03:37
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newsseeker', ' ')the euro has pension plans that it is going to have to pay for making it not as great an alternative as it could be.
The US dollar has HUGE pension issues to pay for too.....unless you think social security is going to be funded with all the SS tax money that was put into the secret lockbox.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
-

Plantagenet
- Expert

-
- Posts: 26765
- Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
- Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).
-
by Newsseeker » Sat 21 Apr 2007, 09:42:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newsseeker', ' ')the euro has pension plans that it is going to have to pay for making it not as great an alternative as it could be.
The US dollar has HUGE pension issues to pay for too.....unless you think social security is going to be funded with all the SS tax money that was put into the secret lockbox.
All apologies. Both currencies are faulty but there is no competing reserve currency.