by TorrKing » Fri 26 Jan 2007, 15:49:05
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('oil_rocks', 'H')i all,
I have read quite a bit about the peak oil theory have found it to be highly flawed in many regards. Its an interesting theory, but the truth is, it simply isn't based on facts, but instead politics.
People who believe in this theory basically see oil extraction as a giant Easter egg hunt and that some day we will wake up to realize all the Easter eggs have all been found. Here are my problems with this method of thinking. perhaps someone can help shed some light on it:
Fatal flaws in the peak oil crisis theory:
1) The theory assumes oil is not a renewable resource. Some believe it is a product of the dinosaurs, but there is no scientific evidence of this. Many scientists believe it is a naturally producing byproduct of the earth's crust. the jury is still out on this and anyone who closes their mind to all possibilities here is not a true scientist.
2) The theory assumes that technology for oil drilling will not improve. Even if we did extract all known oil deposits there's no reason why technology could not be improved to simply drill deeper. Now you have a whole new level of oil deposits to tap into. In theory there would be a nearly limitless amount of oil, because you could always create technology to drill just a little deeper.
3) The theory assumes we are drilling it as fast as we can. The entire oil crisis theory is based on the idea that a lack of oil will force us to slow down production, as if every oil well it simply pumping out at 100% and we just sit and hope we don't run out. The reality is that OPEC and other companies routinely cut back their output for various reasons. They are no where near 100% output.
4) The theory assumes that oil demand will always go up. Says who? why do you make such ridiculous assumptions? Technology comes and goes. did demand for the 8-track tape go up for ever? how about the VCR? sorry, but new forms of energy will soon replace oil and the entire debate will be relegated to the history books.
so all of you can rest easy and not worry so much about things of which you have no control.
1. Oil is a renewable resource, but does it replenish at a rate to match today's consumption? If it doesn't, there will be a peak. Of course, I believe there is but a handful of scientists claiming what you say. Most of them are probably from the US.
2. The theory you refer to is? And, deep drilling will have to take a lot of energy, worsening the input to output ratio energywise. It takes at least a given amount of energy to raise the liquid, regardless of how you do it.
3. To my knowledge, the drilling is going at nearly full capacity. And so much is drilled anyway, that the chance of hitting new big fields aren't too good.
4. The comparison between a VCR and oil isn't valid. Oil is a resource, while a VCR is a product. Please tell me a source of energy that is as easily utilizable as oil?