Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

trying to keep Starbucks out

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby caver456 » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 02:45:02

Hi all - our peak oil group is trying to keep Starbucks from opening 2 new branches in our otherwise small town. They opened one here recently and like clockwork, within a few months the adjacent locally based coffee shop closed its doors. Anyways, we've got 2 calls for help on this topic:

1) I'd like to find some more concrete wording for our reasoning for trying to keep Starbucks out. Generally of course it's the need to support locally based business now, since chain shops have the power to crush locally based competition, and then later on when transportation costs rise and the chain shops close their doors first (because transportation costs affect them more than locally based shops especially if they buy local), this leaves economic devestation behind (the closed starbucks plus the long-since-closed local competition). Etc, etc, etc. But, if we could find a more succinct statement about all this, or some concrete examples and precedents, that would help a lot.

2) what are some strategies that have been used to keep chain shops away in the past? I've done a fair bit of local research and so far it seems to be:
a) get an anti-chain-shop ordinance passed by local government
b) try to get the land owner of the proposed new location to agree with the above arguments
c) get a petition going (we've already got 700+ names - but, who do we send it to?? Who do we lobby to?? Local press, local gov't, Starbucks corporate, the landlord, all of the above, ???)

Any other suggestions? Any details on how to execute these plance and strategies?

Thanks! Any help will be greatly appreciated!!

-Tom Grundy
Alliance for a Post Petroleum Local Economy of Nevada County, CA
http://www.apple-nc.org
User avatar
caver456
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon 22 Jan 2007, 04:00:00

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby gego » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 03:08:44

Fascists, not d***head.

But I suggest you quit trying to control other peoples property and lives.

Don't you think there is a reason that the local shop can't compete. Perhaps it is because people want what Starbucks offers more than they want what the local shop offers.

I think you are at the wrong site, and definitely in the wrong index. Maybe you are even in the wrong country. Maybe try Cuba.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby NEOPO » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 04:49:41

why are you both flaming this clearly misguided peak oil person?
You know that most peakers are attracted to peak oil because they think it will bring down our great nation and what better way to start the fall then to dictate what coffee shops can operate in their area.

If the people want a walmarts on every corner and no little ma and pop rip em off stores then thats just the people getting smarter and starting to realize that economic freedom is probably the most important foundation block of this great god given nation.

Actually I kinda like the walmarts with its red white and blue colors - very patriotic in such trying times.
Starbucks is good also, good people and good coffee plus it has a very groovy star and goddess symbol.
Yeah gego these people must be lost er something man.
I am sure they will rant about equality and fairness etc etc but tough real patriotic americans like us are not falling for that crap!
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 05:20:56

I'm not sure anybody has ever been very successful at getting rid of Starbucks. Mostly it comes down to harassing them to try and vent your anger at their destruction of your neighborhood. Reverend Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping link are probably the most creative such campaign. Can always make some good fliers to post in the area:
Image
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby NEOPO » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 05:31:53

We should be free to go into starbucks, get our coffee and come back to our mercedes/bmw/hummer without having a flier on our windshield!

Plus who knows what filthy scummy unwashed tree huggin hands placed the flier!

Might as well print up some fliers that say "save the trees" 8)
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 05:35:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', 'M')ight as well print up some fliers that say "save the trees" 8)

Seems like those always look better on virgin paper.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby NEOPO » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 05:48:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NEOPO', 'M')ight as well print up some fliers that say "save the trees" 8)

Seems like those always look better on virgin paper.

oooh yes creamy white innocent and untouched virgin paper....
Stop it! I'm gettin a woody! :o
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby gego » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 06:22:25

I live in a very rural area dotted with small towns. The biggest town has 8,000 population, but most are in the 2,000 population category. There are cafes in most of these towns, maybe a Sonic hamburger joint, maybe a Chinese or Mexican restaurant, and one or two of them have a McDonalds. In a few of the towns are Wal-Mart supercenters.

Most of these places you can get coffee, but ordinary coffee, and in the cafes you may have to put up with other people smoking. There is little likelyhood of Starbucks opening around here, not that anyone would care, except someone who would compete with them. Starbucks only opens where they think they would be successful. When a new restaurant or cafe is started by someone, nobody here would consider trying to use the force of government or any other intimidation to keep them from going into business. Have you ever heard of freedom?

Since there seem to be a limited number of jobs around here, I suppose that by the logic of keeping the competition out, then we need to get laws passed to prevent any newcomers from moving in and applying for any of the already scarce jobs. Maybe if you are the wrong nationality we should get a law to prevent you from buying or renting a house or farm, because some of us might not like certain nationalities, and we were here first; you might not fit in with our view of what is good and bad.

Oh! I just noticed that this thread originated in CA. Now I understand. I sure hope you people stay there as we would not want you to violate your principles and do business with anyone other than locals.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby neocone » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 06:43:55

Funny how people pick on starbucks whereas it's one of the few companies that offers decent healthcare to its (mostly young) employees.

I certainly am not for the big evil corporations raping the pristine mom and pop landscape, but if some corporation has success, it is based on DEMAND for its products.

Action and reaction... creativity and imagination can always defeat formulas.

And if you want to know I get a coffee at a coffee shop 5% of the time now... the rest I make my homemade latte with a top quality Saeco machine I got at Costco in 2003 for $198, and REAL IRISH cream in it (and premium coffee I grind myself on the fly in a non made in China SAECO grinder!).

I drink 2-3 coffees a day, so after 1000 of them, I can say I proudly pay about 50 cents a pop... a 90% savings!
User avatar
neocone
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 311
Joined: Sat 23 Sep 2006, 03:00:00

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby NEOPO » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 06:57:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', 'I') live in a very rural area dotted with small towns. The biggest town has 8,000 population, but most are in the 2,000 population category. There are cafes in most of these towns, maybe a Sonic hamburger joint, maybe a Chinese or Mexican restaurant, and one or two of them have a McDonalds. In a few of the towns are Wal-Mart supercenters.

Most of these places you can get coffee, but ordinary coffee, and in the cafes you may have to put up with other people smoking. There is little likelyhood of Starbucks opening around here, not that anyone would care, except someone who would compete with them. Starbucks only opens where they think they would be successful. When a new restaurant or cafe is started by someone, nobody here would consider trying to use the force of government or any other intimidation to keep them from going into business. Have you ever heard of freedom?

Since there seem to be a limited number of jobs around here, I suppose that by the logic of keeping the competition out, then we need to get laws passed to prevent any newcomers from moving in and applying for any of the already scarce jobs. Maybe if you are the wrong nationality we should get a law to prevent you from buying or renting a house or farm, because some of us might not like certain nationalities, and we were here first; you might not fit in with our view of what is good and bad.

Oh! I just noticed that this thread originated in CA. Now I understand. I sure hope you people stay there as we would not want you to violate your principles and do business with anyone other than locals.


Hell yeah!!
No wait..what? :lol:

Heck with it Gego just do what I did and buy into one of those new fangled suburbian mega plexs.
We have our own schools, stores and police!
Most of the "other" people couldnt afford to buy a lot in these joints let alone a house!
Ah yes financial freedom is the best!

Where I come from we have this thing called the growth partnership program where the .gov pays local business leaders to help local businesses get going.
Me and my business buddies always start a few businesses at the beginning of the cycle and then bankrupt them at the end of the cycle so the funds keep flowing.
We would never do anything to hinder business unless its at the end of a grant cycle and then we have to wreck a few of them as thats good for business!

Oddly enough 95% of the business in my district is owned by white men yet we have at least 45% women and at least 15% minorities which proves how lazy women and minorities really are.
I rest my case!
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby dinopello » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 11:15:20

Uh, don't patronize their shop. Small cafe's compete very nicely with Starbucks here. Starbucks does not generally offer a discount over small coffee shops, so they aren't stealing business by that means. Some local shops offer better coffee and pastries than Starbucks, some don't (often a matter of personal preference) some offer a more interesting atmosphere than Starbucks, some don't (often a matter of how good the business person is).

The one advantage Starbucks has that I can see is that they can secure better locations due to their credit history. If anything, work on that - put in place programs that help small independents compete with securing financing so that they are not unfairly disadvantaged due to not fitting into the banker's (often myopic) view of which businesses are good loan risks.

By the way, there are still independent coffee growers, importers and roasters. One I've started drinking is Hondo Coffee. Small batch roaster from a single farm in Honduras, lives and roasts locally and sells coffee and beans at the farmer's markets. Coming soon to a coffee house near me :)
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 11:48:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', 'W')hen a new restaurant or cafe is started by someone, nobody here would consider trying to use the force of government or any other intimidation to keep them from going into business. Have you ever heard of freedom?


The first question is that of corporate personhood. Does a corporation in fact have rights. The courts say they do. I think it's garbage. People have rights. A corportation is not a person. It's a paperwork fiction. Up until very recently it was considered as a point of law that corporations, as justification for their charter, were obligated to serve the public good. In 1886 the supreme court suddenly decided that corporations were an intangible "person" with intrinsic rights. Talk about judicial activism.

Secondly, the question is not some Bushesqe fantasy of freedom vs. those that hate freedom. The question is of whose freedom is pre-eminent. Should local people have the right to control the flavor of communities and their local commerce or should distant corporations have a right to impose their procrustean ideas of commerce, craft the whole world in their image, and convert it into a giant conveyer of cash going into a perpetually shrinking collection of pockets. Living in a world where everywhere looks like everywhere else and all the commerce is controlled by a few dozen CEO's thousands of miles away who suck up all the profits does not strike me as being freedom.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby DarkDawg » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 12:27:12

User avatar
DarkDawg
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Saratoga County, NY

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby frankthetank » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 13:30:23

We don't even have a starbucks here.
lawns should be outlawed.
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby WildRose » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 13:35:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')he question is of whose freedom is pre-eminent. Should local people have the right to control the flavor of communities and their local commerce or should distant corporations have a right to impose their procrustean ideas of commerce, craft the whole world in their image, and convert it into a giant conveyer of cash going into a perpetually shrinking collection of pockets. Living in a world where everywhere looks like everywhere else and all the commerce is controlled by a few dozen CEO's thousands of miles away who suck up all the profits does not strike me as being freedom.


Yes, I agree with your points, SPG, and I think these issues are at the heart of caver456's original post. The point is that keeping smaller businesses healthy in a community keeps more of the money earned in that community. If I purchase my hardware at a smaller, independently owned store, and my coffee at a locally owned cafe, those businesses remain thriving and can, in turn, bring their families to my restaurant for dinner, or can afford donations to a local charity.

Another consideration is how beneficial it can be to a smaller center to revitalize the "downtown" area or existing space in a mall with local businesses instead of developing huge new areas with big box stores. The big stores are essentially an outgrowth of suburbia and are as big a waste of resources.

Consider also that small businesses, when alive and healthy, can be a steady source of employment for generations of people. Has anyone noticed that the Home Depots and other large stores are currently introducing cashier-less checkouts? How long will it be before most of these jobs are replaced in this manner? It's all about the profits.

It's my feeling that these larger chains will go the way of the dinosaur as people have less money in their pockets, anyway. Small business owners have a way of connecting with the people in their community and assessing their needs. When $4/cup specialty coffees at Starbuck's are a luxury very few can afford, the small cafe offering coffee and a muffin for half that amount will have a better chance at succeeding.
User avatar
WildRose
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1881
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby dinopello » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 14:06:04

There is a big difference to keeping out "big box" retailers and a specific store like Starbucks.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ig-Box" is descriptive of the physical characteristics of the building. A big box store is a large, free-standing, rectangular, generally single-floor store built on a concrete slab. The flat roof and ceiling trusses are generally made of steel, the walls are concrete block clad in metal or masonry siding. The interior can be either relatively luxurious, or starkly utilitarian, depending on the market niche of the firm and how it wishes to communicate that market position to its customers.
wiki

Physical characteristics are pretty enduring 20, 50, 100+ years. Also, the specific form of the freestanding store in a sea of parking makes creating a walkable environment impossible.

I agree with SPG that corporations don;t have rights, and that local communities should be able to regulate themselves. What is a chain ? Someone with two shops like my closest coffee shop - Murky Coffee ?

It is difficult to arrive at the precise policy language to regulate this. Regulate the form (physical characteristics) of your community, and help entrepreneurs overcome myopic banking practices toward independents and it will be better than trying to squash things. That's just advice, but as I said - it should be up to the locals - in the end you'll probably get what you deserve.

edit: you can harass chains by such things as sign ordinances that make it difficult for them to plop in their generic branding. This alone causes some to look elsewhere. Again, this is a physical thing that is easier to regulate. However, it also can inhibit innovative signage from independents as well.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 14:10:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('WildRose', 'I')t's my feeling that these larger chains will go the way of the dinosaur as people have less money in their pockets, anyway. Small business owners have a way of connecting with the people in their community and assessing their needs. When $4/cup specialty coffees at Starbuck's are a luxury very few can afford, the small cafe offering coffee and a muffin for half that amount will have a better chance at succeeding.


I hope you're right. The problem is that Starbucks has a large amount of capital and local businesses don't. Starbucks can afford to sell it's product at a loss, force local businesses into bankruptcy, and then jack up the prices. IMHO, the problem is one that has political origins and will have to have political solutions.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby dinopello » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 14:18:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'T')he problem is that Starbucks has a large amount of capital and local businesses don't. Starbucks can afford to sell it's product at a loss, force local businesses into bankruptcy, and then jack up the prices.


Is Starbucks cheaper than your local coffee shop ? Around here, when Starbucks came in, all the locals raised their prices because they suddenly realized that they could get almost $2 for a regular cup of coffee (although I'd bet that almost all of them are still cheaper than Starbucks). The locals were also forced to start giving better health care benefits (maybe thats why they raised the price, I guess) .

I really am not trying to defend Starbucks, its just that my experience about the effect on the local community has been different than many of you are saying.

Now, Home Depot and Walmart are another story in terms of the destruction to the local economy. But they are selling things for much less than the local hardware and department stores.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 14:28:16

The small town (under 10,000) I live in has totally managed to keep a lot of chain stores out. Starbucks made it in here by putting a little outlet in an already existing store (safeway groceries). I know the owner of one of the coffee chains here in town and the next time I see her I will ask her about it.

I do believe the petition should go to your local government. Find out about land zoning proceedures etc. Local shops add so much character that we've managed to improve our tourism and local economy by remaining an authentic town not filled with chains like everyone else. If I can find out who here was responsible for this I will PM you their info so you can talk to them directly.

Its a tough thing to keep these monsters out but they destroy the local economy. look on the web for info about how Wal-mart (or china-mart as we call it here) has ruined the US. That will give you one hell of a lot of arguements. If you make enough of a stink you can demand an open forum before they approve any chain store so that the residents can decide for themselves. Good luck!!!
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Re: trying to keep Starbucks out

Unread postby IanC » Mon 22 Jan 2007, 14:45:16

Although I agree with you in principle, I'd spend my time on other efforts. I live on a really hip street here in Portland. There is an independent coffee house -no kidding- every 3 blocks. They are all packed (mostly with laptop toting young adults blogging their angst about Peak Oil!). So are the Starbuckses. A few neighborhoods tried to keep them out, but to no avail. The truth is that many independent businesses actually LIKE having Starbucks nearby. It is a known brand with a loyal following. It creates loads of foot traffic. Even other cafes benefit by having Starbucks nearby.

Keep the faith, brother, but go after Wal-Mart. As other posters have mentioned, at least SB has health insurance and tuition assistance.

-Ian
Coffeeland
IanC
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun 05 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland Oregon, USA

Next

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests