Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Who is this site's most hard core right-winger?

TommyJefferson
2
No votes
Specop_007
13
No votes
 
Total votes : 15

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 13:22:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', 'W')hat I do know is that this attitude that the left is morally superior to the right is offensive. Both wings live in a moral cesspool.
I'm not sure if this was directed towards me.

I definitely agree that the left and right wings of the ruling Repubilcrat party are both corrupt and vile.

My basic complaint against capitalism can be found in the name. Capital-ism. What is capital? Capital is a particular type of property. Capital is property that you own not because you need it, but because someone else does and will pay you to let them use it. I think that people should be valued in society and reimbursed based on what they do. I don't think people, excluding children, elderly, and the disabled, should be able to sit on thier butts and not do anything and recieve a steady inflow of goods and services just because of what they own. I don't think that people should be able to pass to their children this aristocratic right to leach off of others based on ownership of capital. Its the difference between owning a house to live in vs. owning an apartment complex to coerce rent out of other people. In most historical societies, such usury of other people would be strongly taboo and would lead to severe social shunning and perhaps banishment from the group. Capitalism turns traditional values on their head and makes usury and extortion laudable. My $0.02.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby NEOPO » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 13:40:05

IMHumbleO - The playing field has never (rarely if ever) been level thus there has never been a "free" market.
Long before 1913 when the "great lie" was perpetuated upon the american public the central banks were very active in maintaining an unequal distribution of wealth.
These forces were so powerful they could make or break an economy/country and even the most libertarian politicians knew it and usually played along.

A free market does not exist when powerful central players exist.
The money masters.

As far as right or left politics goes I really really have a hard time seeing the difference these days.
If you ask me the current democratic majority is dominated and littered throughout with Neocon elites.
One body two arms grabbing our freedoms slowly but surely.

As far as who wants a big government welfare state......
The rich have taken more handouts in the form of tax breaks, business incentives et al then the poor yet who "needs" it?
The oil and energy companies are still suckling to the tune of billions of dollars a year.
Who REALLY wants a welfare state?
Who wants people totally dependent?
Yeah......

Bottom line - the purpose of the federal government was to ensure the rights of the free states.
When something does not serve its purpose it is........
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby gego » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 14:03:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'I')'m not sure if this was directed towards me.


I do not agree with your assessment of good and evil when it comes to capital goods.

If I have income or wealth sufficient to provide me with what I want, plus have some left over, what am I supposed to do with the excess, consume some more? Would you prefer to take what excess I have produced and use it for yourself?

If I take my excess wealth, and use it to acquire tools to make me more productive is this evil? If I build an apartment complex with my excess and rent only to those who do not want to be burdened with home maintenance, am I evil and is my capital good, the apartment complex evil? What if people who do want to own a home, but do not have the money, live in my apartment complex out of necessity. If I did not build the apartment complex but rather used my excess to research and then build a factory to manufacture my newly discovered bird flu vaccine, where would the people who could not buy a house live? Would you object to my using my excess to do the bird flu vaccine factory?

I think you have a strange perception of evil and good. It seems to me that you might just object to some people having more than others, and expecting to be compensated for lending their excess. Maybe you could take over Blockbuster and just let people use the videos for free.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 15:22:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', 'I')f I have income or wealth sufficient to provide me with what I want, plus have some left over, what am I supposed to do with the excess, consume some more?
If you have more than you need, you should give it to those in your community who have less. Despite your twisted Gordon Gekko style logic, greed is not good. Generosity is good. Greed is depraved.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby nwildmand » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 15:42:55

what i didnt even get a nomination? im pretty right wing compared to most on this board.

but jack would win it hands down.
User avatar
nwildmand
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed 12 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby Lokutus » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 16:47:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', '
')You think it is ok to take my wealth for your collective purpose and fail to see the immorality in that. I oppose taxes. Were government organized for mutual self defense, and were it supported by voluntary contributions, then it would be moral. When it is organized to manage peoples' lives, take from one to give to another, grant privilege, force contributions to fund itself, then it is immoral and those who support it, demanding it function thusly are immoral also; this is the left and right.

As a libertarian I am neither left or right because I do not endorse or support any function of government other than mutual self defense paid for voluntarily.

So I do see you as immoral, and myself not. Additionally I see threads like this as hypocritical because they condemn using words like "hard core" and "extremest" to negatively reflect of one group while the ones doing the condemning are no better.


What a load of unadulterated horsehit.

You are one of those people who never acknowledges any debt to the society that produced you and enables your activity. You are like the trucking company owner who doesn't want to pay taxes for the upkeep of the roads he deopends. You are like the patient who doesn't want to pay any taxes which support the NIH centers and medical research which helps you to recover your health.

No sirreee bob, you owe nothing to society. You are completely self-contained and the only debt is from the rest of humanity to you.

Let me guess, you're about 22 yearts old.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby gego » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 17:03:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'D')espite your twisted Gordon Gekko style logic, greed is not good. Generosity is good. Greed is depraved.


I disagree entirely. Keeping what one has if he chooses to do so is a personal decision. Generosity is a choice. Choosing to keep what one has honestly acquired is a choice. Where does the idea that one is good and one is bad come from, or that one man is responsible for another. What is depraved is a group (government) taking from one person because he has it, to give to another because he does not, against the will of the first person. This is not generosity, it is theft. If you being generous makes you feel good, then by all means make that choice, but do not presume to make it for others.

I venture to say that humanity has lived much more comfortably as the result of the accumulation of capital than could ever have happened without it.

If you are so anti capital, refuse to use anything that came into your hands as a result capital. You would not have even clothes to wear were it not for the capital goods used in their production, nor would you be able to drive without the capital invested in drilling and producing the gasoline, or the car in which it used by you.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby Lokutus » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 17:07:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'D')espite your twisted Gordon Gekko style logic, greed is not good. Generosity is good. Greed is depraved.


I disagree entirely. Keeping what one has if he chooses to do so is a personal decision. Generosity is a choice. Choosing to keep what one has honestly acquired is a choice. Where does the idea that one is good and one is bad come from, or that one man is responsible for another. What is depraved is a group (government) taking from one person because he has it, to give to another because he does not, against the will of the first person. This is not generosity, it is theft. If you being generous makes you feel good, then by all means make that choice, but do not presume to make it for others.

I venture to say that humanity has lived much more comfortably as the result of the accumulation of capital than could ever have happened without it.

If you are so anti capital, refuse to use anything that came into your hands as a result capital. You would not have even clothes to wear were it not for the capital goods used in their production, nor would you be able to drive without the capital invested in drilling and producing the gasoline, or the car in which it used by you.


Why do I have the uncomforable feeling that your posts are all cut n paste jobs from some Ayn Rand fansite?

You, my friend, are an ideologue. This objectivist nonsense is your religion.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA
Top

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby Lokutus » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 17:13:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', ' ')
If you are so anti capital, refuse to use anything that came into your hands as a result capital. You would not have even clothes to wear were it not for the capital goods used in their production, nor would you be able to drive without the capital invested in drilling and producing the gasoline, or the car in which it used by you.


And you are so rabidly against acknowledging the communal benefits you have mooched off your entire life, that the only moral thing for a self-proclaimed morally superior being such as yourself to do now is leave society and build your own life from scratch out in some remote corner of the Canadian Arctic or Siberia.

Yes, let's see you build wealth without leeching off all the taxpayer funded infrastructure.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA
Top

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby gego » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 17:20:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', '
')Let me guess, you're about 22 yearts old.


If the government had not taken over the business of providing roads, then I could use toll roads and pay for what I get. You can only see the collectivist way of doing things, involving government and force. You clearly do not understand associating by voluntary agreement, freedom.

You need a lesson in human reproduction. Society did not produce me, my parents did. That you think society produced me is yet further evidence of your collectivist mindset. And no, I do not have a debt to you or anybody else that I did not voluntarily incur. I am not an indentured servant, as you seem to think that we all should be.

I would like to take issue with this attempt of yours to put others in an inferior position by referring to them as "son". Maybe you heard this used by others and think it works to intimidate, but I think it is offensive, and certainly ineffective. Is that why you are concerned about my age, or is that just another attempt to put someone down because of the date of their birth, as if younger means inferior?
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby venky » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 17:32:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') zero sum game assumes there is a limited amount of wealth to be distributed. In fact wealth is created/extracted by certain activities, and there are many instances of people achieving a large amount of wealth while also improving the lives of others, simply by making more new wealth available to himself and others.



How would you reconcile the above with Peak Oil and Global warming, which does indicate that we will scale down economic activities to a great extent. I would consider myself a centrist (with an assumption that the status quo will be maintained), however with the assumption that economic activity will lessen in the future, it would also follow that the opportunities for people to enrich themselves and move up in life by innovation and profiting from new econmic schemes and ideas will also be extremely limited. I also believe (though I cant prove) that an unrestricted free market in these circumstances of a declining economy, which you seem to espouse will lead to even more concentration of wealth and power, that remains in certain hands over time, leaving the bulk of the masses with little chance of improving their life.
I play the cards I'm dealt, though I sometimes bluff.

Only Man is vile.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 17:43:59

I like this thread. I was perusing a libertarian website, trying to find the viewpoint on the legitimacy of property rights vis-a-vis the homestead system, Louisiana Purchase, and all that other boring stuff. Basically, the libertarian viewpoint is that is one's labor is mixed with 'unowned' (does that condition exist?) property, then it becomes theirs, much as if a tool is made out of a rock, it then becomes the property of the maker. I suppose I don't have a problem with this, other than the fact that it is a belief system found to be completely incompatible with those of the original Indian tribes, and enforceable only by law & a standing army.

Just rambling here... continuing on...
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby Lokutus » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 17:51:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', '
')Let me guess, you're about 22 yearts old.


If the government had not taken over the business of providing roads, then I could use toll roads and pay for what I get. You can only see the collectivist way of doing things, involving government and force. You clearly do not understand associating by voluntary agreement, freedom.

You need a lesson in human reproduction. Society did not produce me, my parents did. That you think society produced me is yet further evidence of your collectivist mindset. And no, I do not have a debt to you or anybody else that I did not voluntarily incur. I am not an indentured servant, as you seem to think that we all should be.

I would like to take issue with this attempt of yours to put others in an inferior position by referring to them as "son". Maybe you heard this used by others and think it works to intimidate, but I think it is offensive, and certainly ineffective. Is that why you are concerned about my age, or is that just another attempt to put someone down because of the date of their birth, as if younger means inferior?


You really are an idealogue.

The fact is that Rand's objectivism is a philosophy for the well-pampered under 25 set.

Enjoy your delusions as long as possible because reality will set in shortly.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA
Top

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 17:56:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gego', '
')If the government had not taken over the business of providing roads, then I could use toll roads and pay for what I get.


I'm actually impressed that you don't equivocate your beliefs on the subject of travel and passage. Most of the libertarian articles & papers that I've read consider the necessity of a government-sanctioned free road network as a foregone conclusion for the "free-market" society to function correctly. Such a network, in effect, provides the conduit and medium for the private property system to function properly, or so I hear. I see this particular deference to collectivism as a cop-out, frankly. But, as I see, you do not proffer such a belief - kudos to that.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 18:17:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'B')asically, the libertarian viewpoint is that is one's labor is mixed with 'unowned' (does that condition exist?) property, then it becomes theirs, much as if a tool is made out of a rock, it then becomes the property of the maker.


I don't have a problem with that either. I personally think social structures that demand frequent shows of generosity and humility are very much to be admired. An example is the giveaway. Any time an important event happened in a Lakota's life (marriages, adoptions, etc.) they held a giveaway. The person that was celebrating was obliged to give away most everything they owned. Part of a funeral was that except perhaps a few small keepsakes, all the dead person's possessions were given away outside the family. It helped people avoid getting too attached to stuff and helped them remember that it was the community not things that was most important to their survival.

Now a days we have the opposite situation. The aristocratic class is born with huge accumulations of capital such that they can loaf off their whole lives. As time goes by, the owners of capital are able to leveridge it such that wealth accumulates in a smaller and smaller number of hands every year. Much of that accumulation happens as the result of outright crime. The Weyerhouser land holdings are one such good example. When the Northern Pacific Railroad was built, the railroad was promised huge swaths of land in the Northwest, millions of acres, in return for completing the railroad on time. The railroad was not completed on time, but the railroad was given the lands anyway. One provision of the grant was that if they chose to sell the lands, they were required to do so at public auction. The Harrimans sold their land illeagally to the Weyerhousers, and that's why huge tracts of land today are owned by Weyerhouser in Washington State. A more recent example would be Bill Gates' theft of the Xerox's Alton Park concept upon which he has become the wealthiest person in human history.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby gego » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 18:21:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('venky', '
')...it would also follow that the opportunities for people to enrich themselves and move up in life by innovation and profiting from new econmic schemes and ideas will also be extremely limited. I also believe (though I cant prove) that an unrestricted free market in these circumstances of a declining economy, which you seem to espouse will lead to even more concentration of wealth and power, that remains in certain hands over time, leaving the bulk of the masses with little chance of improving their life.


The pie and how it is distributed!

Of course the economic pie will shrink as a result of the increasing energy cost of acquiring resources and a result of extracting less resources. This will happen as a result of nature, irrespective of what man does, short of discovering and harnessing a totally new source of energy to replace what we have depleted.

How the smaller pie is divided is a separate issue. I think that even those who find my thoughts offensive agree that the present worldwide system of having rulers grant economic advantage to themselves and their friends has resulted in concentrated wealth.

If this system continues the burden of a shrinking pie will be more heavily borne by the majority, resulting in more concentration of wealth.

One of the alternatives is a typical Soviet Union or South American collectivization which would result in an immediate destruction of most of the pie, simply because these systems do not work.

Another alternative is to remove the many, many laws that grant privilege to the few at the expense of the many and let the free market work. This is not going to stop the effect of the shrinking pie, but it will allow people to freely follow their own best interest without the burden of having a good portion of their effort stolen by those with legal privilege or by the government itself.

Unfortunately the collectivist mindset of the majority will likely lead to support for more and more government intervention in the economy, further destroying the free markets and creating even more privilege for the special interests; witness the mandating and subsidy by government of this foolish ethanol alternative. Does not that take wealth out of your pockets, making life more difficult, while benefiting an industry that the free market judged to be unworthy of investment?

None of you need worry that economic freedom will be the means by which we traverse the future. There is no way that those enjoying the benefits of being your masters will relinquish their nice position voluntarily. There may be some cases of countries collectivizing like Venezuela, much to the detriment of the citizenry, but I am sure this alternative will make those of you with these collectivist desires to not run your own lives happy until you get over the cheering of the change in rulers and face the reality.

In actuality, I think that the economic collapse will come on with such speed and the dieoff progress with such ferocity that post peak, not much will matter but who can outrun the bear.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 18:54:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', 'N')ow a days we have the opposite situation. The aristocratic class is born with huge accumulations of capital such that they can loaf off their whole lives. As time goes by, the owners of capital are able to leveridge it such that wealth accumulates in a smaller and smaller number of hands every year. Much of that accumulation happens as the result of outright crime.


If (and I mean 'if') a libertarian or sympathetic third party were ever to rise to power, their first order of business should be to divest these interests of their ill-gotten and bequeathed property. It is imperative within the libertarian philosophy to do so, as I understand it. The current system is no different than the feudal system, except that fraud and deception are somewhat less overt, but no less accomplishing the same ends. If the libertarians want change, it will have to be farther and deeper than reforming/abolishing the IRS, as the playing field has been anything but even and the game is decades over by now anyhow.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby cynicalheretic » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 19:50:35

Specop hasn't created a thread on here since October of last year. and his last post on here seems to have been Jan 04. He use to be here all day long and never seemed to leave. Maybe he finally got a girlfriend or maybe he just found a life. Either way he is probably better off.
cynicalheretic
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu 02 Nov 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Poll: PO.com's Most hard core right-winger?

Unread postby Lokutus » Tue 09 Jan 2007, 19:57:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '
')If (and I mean 'if') a libertarian or sympathetic third party were ever to rise to power, their first order of business should be to divest these interests of their ill-gotten and bequeathed property.


Hey, if that's how the Libertarians are willing to start...having everyone start fresh from square one...then it's gone up a point in my estimation. Note that a single point is not a significant improvement.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests