Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Sign US getting ready for war ?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby Armageddon » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 01:16:21

Capturing and killing the leader of the army you are fighting , and replacing their military and government tells me the US have accomplished their goals.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby PolestaR » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 01:17:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', 'H')ow do you define win ? By the amount of dead ? By the length of time occupying ?


A win for america would be them successfully installing their values (democracy they say) upon the populace and for their to be relative peace (to show acceptance of the new values) and order. It is not a win for them when they need to stay there to keep their values there. If they left now what do you think would happen, almost immediately?

That's why they haven't won.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby PolestaR » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 01:20:04

If you define winning as being able to bomb/kill people in a foreign country, I don't think anyone has ever lost. :lol:

America is there for an objective, they have to complete it to be successful, to win. You really want to spend trillions just to let off a few bombs and hang someone? Because it can be done for a few million if thats all you want.
Last edited by PolestaR on Thu 04 Jan 2007, 01:21:38, edited 1 time in total.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby threadbear » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 01:21:07

Wow Armegeddon, You mean a fairly large group of people is secretly planning to do something nasty? What are you, some kind of conspiracy freak?
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby Armageddon » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 01:25:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', 'H')ow do you define win ? By the amount of dead ? By the length of time occupying ?


A win for america would be them successfully installing their values (democracy they say) upon the populace and for their to be relative peace (to show acceptance of the new values) and order. It is not a win for them when they need to stay there to keep their values there. If they left now what do you think would happen, almost immediately?

That's why they haven't won.


You cannot institute democracy on people who do not want to be democratized. There is no way to stop the insurgency. The US is fighting people from several neighboring countries which are being supplied with ammo from russia, iran and china.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby Armageddon » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 01:30:06

The US is there for the oil. And as long as they are getting ME oil, they are winning. Having control of the oil and building permanent military bases was the objective. They have reached both objectives.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby PolestaR » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 01:30:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', 'Y')ou cannot institute democracy on people who do not want to be democratized. There is no way to stop the insurgency. The US is fighting people from several neighboring countries which are being supplied with ammo from russia, iran and china.


Oh.. really? Nah you must be joking because like, Bush said it was like possible and junk. :o I'm not the fool saying the US won. You're either ignorant about what "winning" is or just gave us some nice diarrhea to look at, I'll go with both. :lol:
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby Armageddon » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 01:34:26

Bush could care less if everybody in iraq dies in a civil war. The oil is what he is there for.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby Armageddon » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 01:36:41

Bush beat china and india to iraq's oil. Those two huge energy needing countries need oil, and Bush was not going to lose out on the second largest proven oil reserve on the planet. He won.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby PolestaR » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 02:03:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', 'B')ush beat china and india to iraq's oil. Those two huge energy needing countries need oil, and Bush was not going to lose out on the second largest proven oil reserve on the planet. He won.


Aye... they are only getting oil whilst there is significant troops there. Soon as they pull out (even to their bases) it will come undone I think. They need a stable government and populace to get that oil from only being in their bases. Won't happen.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby Armageddon » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 02:49:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('armegeddon', 'B')ush beat china and india to iraq's oil. Those two huge energy needing countries need oil, and Bush was not going to lose out on the second largest proven oil reserve on the planet. He won.


Aye... they are only getting oil whilst there is significant troops there. Soon as they pull out (even to their bases) it will come undone I think. They need a stable government and populace to get that oil from only being in their bases. Won't happen.


Judging by the size of the bases they have built, they wont be leaving anytime soon.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo
Top

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby spear » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 06:37:32

From the article on the first post,it was made crystal clear that the US has no intentions of departing from the ME anytime soon,so its fair to assume that it will get worse before it gets better.
This game will go on for the next few years.The next US president will inherit it.
Personally I think that Bush,being an oil man,will if nothing else set the stage for a rising oil price before he goes.
The tensions will be raised to a point where there is a huge profit for a select few.
ΜΟΛΩΝ-ΛΑΒΕ
User avatar
spear
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 801
Joined: Wed 17 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: EL-LAS

Re: Sign US getting ready for war ?

Unread postby EnergyUnlimited » Thu 04 Jan 2007, 09:41:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', 'S')ure America could drop the old H-bomb and kill most countries if it wanted, but then it would face it's own annihilation from other similarly equipped countries. So they can't really do that, or they lose. Putting it on the table sounds like the usual sore loser attitude "Yeah if we played the game again I'd beat you this time".

I am gradually coming to belief, that such solution, eg major nuclear powers from East and West cross-nuking each other, will actually be exercised in the future, say within next decade or two.
NPT is falling apart, tensions between major nuclear nations are growing up, nuke posturing is on the increase etc.
As Hiroshima memories are fading away, people begin to be less and less scared of nukes as well.
It looks like, that a kind of consensus between politicians worldwide anticipating necessity of next big war is beginning to emerge.
This may be similar to situation just before WW I.
Everyone knew, that a war is coming, that nothing can be done to prevent it, and on the end it actually came.
It may well be irrelevant, that all involved will prove to be losers in such a war. They may well decide to start nuclear war, because of impossibility of stabilizing world or dividing it into "areas of influence" in any imaginable fashion, which would be acceptable to nuclear states in dispute.

American way of life is not negotiable + Russian influence on most of Europe and big parts of Asia is not negotiable + China economic growth is not negotiable...= no solution, other than a war
Now we may begin to negotiate, what we are not going to nuke, before the war starts (I hope that nuclear power plants will be included on that list...).
User avatar
EnergyUnlimited
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7537
Joined: Mon 15 May 2006, 03:00:00
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests