Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Pentagon Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 03 Nov 2006, 20:05:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AgentR', '
')Demand? No.

Permit? Yes.
very true and profound. it's the whole key, the answer to reductionism. Nothing wrong with reductionism; as an analytic tool it's made great discoveries possible. but that very success leads to excesses and conceptual traps. chemists have had as a philisophical goal, the connection of chemistry to the physics underpinning it: but as a practical matter, chemist have mostly worked in a chemical universe, with the laws they understand being chemical ones, and have just set aside a special branch called "physical chemistry" for a little bit of their field dealing more with physics. A similar thing happens in biology: the goal being in some quarters to relate the Laws of Biology to chemical issues while mostly biology is a realm unto itself. These "higher" phenomena don't seem to get reduced to the more fundamental ones; not becasue it's hard to do, but because they really aren't entirely reducible. Something emerges in chemistry which is intrinsically "chemical" obeying chemical laws while not contradicting physics, but merely fleshing out a new set of rules from what is indeterminant in physics about the behavior of aggregates of atoms. Biology is more than just chemistry in the same way. And humans are more than just biology in the same way, there being plenty of evidence for this in terms of both the complexity of the human brain and it's manifestations in history. This doesn't mean that ghosts exist or that Jesus really did walk on water or turn water into wine. Indeed, this scheme, which I read years ago, precludes the possibility of any such things that defy the Laws of Nature. But it also shows that the goal of reducing biology to physics is impossible, not just difficult. That human consciousness can be reduced to or understood as physics is also impossible, by this theory.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 03 Nov 2006, 20:36:27

BTW, AgentR, your posts are very satisfying and welcome, not just to me but to others here as well. Carlhole is usually pretty reasonable, most of the time, I find. But it is so obvious that Popular Mechanics and others have raised the burden of proof too high to be dismissed. There are clearly distortions and wilfull blindness to them on the part of the 911 truthers. The Jim Fetzer presentation shows this sort of thing immediately. The Pentagon comes out with a statement about lack of evidence tying OBL to 911. So Fetzer then says, if it wasn't OBL, then who was it? Such shoddy thought processes permeate the whole thing. (Fetzer also says little tip-off lines like OBL is supposed to have accomplished this "from a cave" as if he didn't know that OBL fled to his cave after the US invasion of Afghanistan) We have had our own expert opinion here from AirlinePilot on the scrambling issue, but it just gets dismissed by those who have already made up their minds it was an inside job.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby emailking » Fri 03 Nov 2006, 20:39:20

I'll accept airline pilot as an expert on things like pressure readings and the significance of deviations in a computer simulation, but not on the scrambling procedures for military jets.
User avatar
emailking
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat 11 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby mmasters » Fri 03 Nov 2006, 20:47:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', ' ')That human consciousness can be reduced to or understood as physics is also impossible, by this theory.

Perhaps those that created that theory had a superiority complex concerning their limited world view. ;)
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 03 Nov 2006, 21:07:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mmasters', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', ' ')That human consciousness can be reduced to or understood as physics is also impossible, by this theory.

Perhaps those that created that theory had a superiority complex concerning their limited world view. ;)
perhaps, he was a German. :roll: I want to read that book again, it was a mind-expanding event for me when I picked out of the local Community College library's philosophy section. The book, interestingly, was mainly about time and experiments that show how different animals have completely different time-mechanisms they work by. Unfortunately, all I can remember is that his name was Fraser. But I had been bothered by the reductionism issue in my youthful explorations of ideas. It just felt wrong, but I didn't understand why. This has stayed with me for 30 years. Anybody know who this author was that I'm describing? He was German and fled to England where he landed in acedemia.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby PolestaR » Sat 04 Nov 2006, 01:51:19

AgentR, Gideon and PMS are the reason society is failing. PMS comes across as some ex-hippy who smoked too much drugs and fell on this whole doom thing as an OBE (no offense, I'm perceptive ;) ).

Anyone who thinks they KNOW when to use faith and when not is an idiot. Let me explain, when you have faith in something you have stopped learning about that particular thing. If you don't , you have no faith. So when someone says "I have faith in god" that means that's it... the book of learning is closed. You have accepted something without evidence or logic, or even in this case gone against evidence and logic to believe in whichever god you do (all of the big 3 religions are illogical and have little evidence supporting them but a lot disproving).

Such a waste of resources, really, people like this. They think they can come to a scientific or mostly rational forum like this and blend in and be a part of something REAL. YOURE OF A DIFFERENT ILK, GO BACK TO FAIRY LAND. Let us hell dwellers get there faster and go talk to some idiots somewhere else you can convert.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sat 04 Nov 2006, 02:34:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', 'A')gentR, Gideon and PMS are the reason society is failing.
Image
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby emailking » Sat 04 Nov 2006, 11:06:07

"Emailking, please save the "I am an expert and you are not" approach to arguing that might impress weak minded people who think sitting through "2 years of general relativity" makes you an authority on God."

Gideon, stop putting words in my mouth. It makes me an authority on whether or not the universe creating itself by time travel is a laughable position. This is what I said and you know it.

"Emailking, for the purposes of this argument, I agree that the Big Bang occurred. And, if you insist, I'll agree it occurred at 10 to the negative 78.4 milliseconds! Or whatever the other guy with the PhD in physcis says is correct."

So why you spent three posts trying to argue that it didn 't or that it somehow erases all need for religious explanation is beyond me.

"My conclusion is unchanged. If you can't explain why it occurred, then your position is entirely faith based."

Nonsense.
User avatar
emailking
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat 11 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby AgentR » Sat 04 Nov 2006, 12:24:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Gideon', '
') 1 - Inconsistencies in evidence are often the best proof we ever have of wrongdoing.


No, they are not. They are an indication that further review might reveal something; but they can also simply indicate the limit of the information that was captured during any particular event.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')ohn's story has about 100 inconsistencies, and we need to look into it more carefully.


Thats fine. (As long as I don't have to pay for your curiosity). However, the fact that John's story has 100 inconsistencies doesn't necessarily indicate that he is lieing, or even hiding something. It can, again, simply indicate the limit of the accuracy of his ability to recall the event.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') 2 - This, AgentR, is your thing. It's strongly intimated in your last post, and I think it's a good inference.


I don't disagree. However, I find that my interest in the concept is akin to traffic accident gawkers simultaneously hoping no one was hurt, while also wishing to see the gore.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')our desire to bury 911 and your "no no no" head shaking on every detail is, IMO, your least rational position on this board.


Bury would be too strong a word. I just think it would be a waste of money to get into a cylce of a new 9/11 investigation every other year until each and every group of paranoids has been satisfied with at least one sympathetic end result.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd be honest, AgentR, you <b>don't</b> want the conspiracy to be true. Figure out that bias, and you take another step.

I think you need to go back to some of my first posts here on the subject. I don't *care* if any particular one of the conspiracy theories is true. Getting a commission to return a result that says position A is now truth wouldn't change anything. There will still be dozens of conspiracy groups flailing around aimlessly, and they will continue until either they get their own sympathetic report, or they die of old age.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t never occurred to me that you were a Bush partisan. I just
thought you were right leaning.

As I've noted in other threads. I think Bush is a lefty wuss. Less of a wuss than Kerry and Gore, but still a wuss.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby PolestaR » Mon 06 Nov 2006, 20:38:42

I'm expecting the video to be released today to coincide with the elections. Where is the place we can refresh to see the news today?
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby emailking » Mon 13 Nov 2006, 00:01:28

Unbelievable.

http://www.infowars.net/articles/novemb ... n_tape.htm

The government is reneging on its promise to release this video by last Thursday. They need "more time" before they will release this video.
User avatar
emailking
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat 11 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby mmasters » Mon 13 Nov 2006, 00:08:05

Interesting... seems since TBTB decided to back out on supporting the repubs this time around the propaganda favoring them was withheld.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: Pentagon Video From Doubletree To Be Released Within a W

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Mon 13 Nov 2006, 00:13:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emailking', 'T')hey need "more time" before they will release this video.


Editing frames at a rate of 30 per second to show an aircraft crash at 400 yards must be more laborious than they thought. :roll:

Photoshop would've been SO much easier. :P
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

New Pentagon Video

Unread postby dukey » Sun 03 Dec 2006, 14:50:44

Oh look another video showing, or rather NOT showing any plane hitting the pentagon. Do you see a giant 747 crashing into it ? Sure the video is shit quality, but even so perhaps u would see something as big as a 747 ? If the government wanted to crush the conspiracy theories they are doing a rather lame job at it. What about the video footage from like the 50 security cameras on the front of the pentagon ?

[flash width=425 height=350]http://www.youtube.com/v/gIw9jrOhT8w[/flash]

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea ... 1507751455

Image
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: New Pentagon Video

Unread postby mmasters » Sun 03 Dec 2006, 16:13:37

The plane must be "cloaked"
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic

Re: New Pentagon Video

Unread postby NEOPO » Sun 03 Dec 2006, 16:19:57

all ya gotta do is paint it sky blue and walla!

<sarcasm off>
It is easier to enslave a people that wish to remain free then it is to free a people who wish to remain enslaved.
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: New Pentagon Video

Unread postby rogerhb » Sun 03 Dec 2006, 16:24:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'D')o you see a giant 747 crashing into it ?


Nobody seriously claims one did. It was a 757.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: New Pentagon Video

Unread postby Madpaddy » Sun 03 Dec 2006, 16:26:25

rogerhb wrote,

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')obody seriously claims one did. It was a 757.


That right there is why I love you so much.

I have much to learn from you oh master.
User avatar
Madpaddy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2043
Joined: Fri 25 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Pentagon resists pleas for help in Afghan opium fight

Unread postby Zardoz » Wed 06 Dec 2006, 03:36:51

Excuse me? Something smells really bad about this:

The DEA wants the military to take a larger role in stopping the drug trade, which experts say finances the insurgency.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Pentagon, engaged in a difficult fight to defeat a resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan, has resisted entreaties from U.S. anti-narcotics officials to play an aggressive role in the faltering campaign to curb the country's opium trade.

Military units in Afghanistan largely overlook drug bazaars, rebuff some requests to take U.S. drug agents on raids and do little to counter the organized crime syndicates shipping the drug to Europe, Asia and, increasingly, the United States, according to officials and documents...

...Outgoing Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has said that Afghanistan's flourishing opium trade is a law enforcement problem, not a military one. It would be "mission creep" if the 21,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan were to turn their attention to opium, and it would also set a precedent for future combat operations, military officials say.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said Afghanistan's police forces and British troops in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization peacekeeping operation have the primary responsibility for fighting the Afghan drug problem.

Military officials also fear that cracking down on opium traffickers could alienate the Afghan people and warlords who profit from the trade. An estimated one-eighth of the population is involved in poppy cultivation, and the opium trade is one-third of the country's economy.

Oh, please. This just stinks...
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest