Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

We can believe

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: We can believe

Unread postby rogerhb » Thu 07 Sep 2006, 23:02:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('clueless', 'A')s I said, you choose not to believe.


In my position, it's not I choose not to believe, I am incapable of believing in what you expect me to believe. My brain does not work that way. Maybe if I had been indoctrinated before the age of four that would have been possible, but no longer.

Just like I am crap at learning foreign languages.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: We can believe

Unread postby rwwff » Thu 07 Sep 2006, 23:07:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'I') think a preference to believe in something so incomprehensible that it defies any attempt to understand its nature or prove or disprove its existence doesn't really violate this definition of objectivity.


So where the fundamentalist falls down is trying to back up their preference with proof from the real world, eg the collection of stories from some middle eastern tribes plus a couple of letters.


They don't so much fall down, as they do simply fail to convince the unbeliever who wants proof. The unfortunate part is that people are often too simple to understand that if someone needs proof, they will be unwilling to accept a faith, on faith. Making the whole process absolutely pointless from the start. And from the other direction, the fact that the faithful has faith, makes it absolutely pointless for the unbeliever to try to unconvince them based upon a lack of proof. Faith that requires proof, is not faith in the first place.

This is why I think these debates generally go nowhere, only acting to provide an exercise where both sides are really just talking to themselves. Not that it isn't entertaining to participate in, from time to time...
Last edited by rwwff on Thu 07 Sep 2006, 23:08:18, edited 1 time in total.
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: We can believe

Unread postby dinopello » Thu 07 Sep 2006, 23:07:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', 'S')o where the fundamentalist falls down is trying to back up their preference with proof from the real world, eg the collection of stories from some middle eastern tribes plus a couple of letters.


Something akin to the people that say they invented a perpetual motion machine because they filed a patent or have a website.

and actually, this is where they fall down

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')nd also in a willingness to revise or abandon your theories when the tests fail (as they usually do).
Last edited by dinopello on Thu 07 Sep 2006, 23:11:09, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby rwwff » Thu 07 Sep 2006, 23:10:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'S')omething akin to the people that say they invented a perpetual motion machine because they filed a patent or have a website.


Not really. Perpetual motion machines are uniformly demonstratably false. There can be no falsification of an object of faith.
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby rogerhb » Thu 07 Sep 2006, 23:17:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'N')ot really. Perpetual motion machines are uniformly demonstratably false. There can be no falsification of an object of faith.


We can prove that the world is finite, so why don't mainstream economists understand that you cannot continue to grow forever?
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby dinopello » Thu 07 Sep 2006, 23:17:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'S')omething akin to the people that say they invented a perpetual motion machine because they filed a patent or have a website.


Not really. Perpetual motion machines are uniformly demonstratably false. There can be no falsification of an object of faith.


Well sure, if you believe in thermodynamics. But seriously, OK - how about cold fusion? What I was trying to equate is the idea that because some "document" says something doesn't make it true until the due diligence is performed.

Actually I "believe" that pretty much everything you "know" with eventually be shown to be false, or at least an approximation. I think thermodynamics will outlast me however. I'm an engineer so approximation is good enough to do many 'useful' things.

I have to stop now, I'm using too many quoted words.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby rwwff » Thu 07 Sep 2006, 23:23:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'N')ot really. Perpetual motion machines are uniformly demonstratably false. There can be no falsification of an object of faith.
We can prove that the world is finite, so why don't mainstream economists understand that you cannot continue to grow forever?


Because they have money in the stock and commodities markets and need you to believe that to be so inorder that their profits continue at least for as long as they are interested in them?

An interesting point that got drilled into me in college financial accounting; forever is 30 years.. If you can show something will work out to thirty years, you've shown forever. Talking about something from an economic perspective and thinking in terms of fifty or a hundred years is an absolute flight of fancy; Star Trek is more believable than such stupidity.
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby rwwff » Thu 07 Sep 2006, 23:32:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dinopello', 'W')ell sure, if you believe in thermodynamics. But seriously, OK - how about cold fusion? What I was trying to equate is the idea that because some "document" says something doesn't make it true until the due diligence is performed.


Certainly, no document by itself physically proves anything. Its just words on paper. But that fact doesn't help you in countering the religious context. Faith, by definition, requires no proof. To certain types of Christians, they have an expressed faith in the inerrancy of the Scriptures. That faith then evolves based upon the content of that book, elaborating all kinds of moral and ethical teachings, spiritual truths, etc. That book becomes the agreed upon axiom of their discussions. Reject the axiom, and you might as well not even be in the same room.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m an engineer so approximation is good enough to do many 'useful' things.


Truth is only in the expression of the number of significant digits.

Problems occur when you have three significant digits, and people live or die depending upon what the fourth would have been.
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby dinopello » Thu 07 Sep 2006, 23:39:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'P')roblems occur when you have three significant digits, and people live or die depending upon what the fourth would have been.


Yea, and if that was the only way problems occured life would be much simpler.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby rogerhb » Fri 08 Sep 2006, 06:54:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'A')n interesting point that got drilled into me in college financial accounting; forever is 30 years.. If you can show something will work out to thirty years, you've shown forever.


By that token, anything that happened more that 30 years ago is similarly irrelevant, for example any time when we didn't have a fiat currency.....
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby katkinkate » Fri 08 Sep 2006, 07:07:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('clueless', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')xcept, that minor point, that is deliberately avoided, that this chap you refer to, hasn't written anything.


Actually that is untrue, According to the Bible. You simply refuse to believe it.

Joh 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God....


Yeah, yeah, yeah .. but that's just John's opinion. Can we trust the word of a man who died, like, nearly 2000 years ago, before they invented science. I don't even know the guy. Why should I take anything he wrote as gospel. :) He might have been this day's equivilent to Billy Graham.
Kind regards, Katkinkate

"The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops,
but the cultivation and perfection of human beings."
Masanobu Fukuoka
User avatar
katkinkate
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1276
Joined: Sat 16 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby rogerhb » Fri 08 Sep 2006, 07:21:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('katkinkate', 'H')e might have been this day's equivilent to Billy Graham.


Or Jimmy Swaggart. However, briefly moving back to the main point of the topic:

After the last five years and the WMD fiasco, I think we can add another category;

We believe something if it is repeated enough
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby Doly » Fri 08 Sep 2006, 07:50:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '
')We believe something if it is repeated enough


Hitler knew perfectly the technique. He had a name for it: he called it the Big Lie.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby Carlhole » Fri 08 Sep 2006, 07:57:42

If anyone ever would like to read an involved book on the subject, the best one I ever read was "A History of God: The 4,000-Year Quest of Judaism, Christianity and Islam" by Karen Armstrong.

From Amazon.com:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Amazon', 'A')rmstrong, a British journalist and former nun, guides us along one of the most elusive and fascinating quests of all time--the search for God. Like all beloved historians, Armstrong entertains us with deft storytelling, astounding research, and makes us feel a greater appreciation for the present because we better understand our past. Be warned: A History of God is not a tidy linear history. Rather, we learn that the definition of God is constantly being repeated, altered, discarded, and resurrected through the ages, responding to its followers' practical concerns rather than to mystical mandates. Armstrong also shows us how Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have overlapped and influenced one another, gently challenging the secularist history of each of these religions. --Gail Hudson

From Publishers Weekly
This searching, profound comparative history of the three major monotheistic faiths fearlessly illuminates the sociopolitical ground in which religious ideas take root, blossom and mutate. Armstrong, a British broadcaster, commentator on religious affairs and former Roman Catholic nun, argues that Judaism, Christianity and Islam each developed the idea of a personal God, which has helped believers to mature as full human beings. Yet Armstrong also acknowledges that the idea of a personal God can be dangerous, encouraging us to judge, condemn and marginalize others. Recognizing this, each of the three monotheisms, in their different ways, developed a mystical tradition grounded in a realization that our human idea of God is merely a symbol of an ineffable reality. To Armstrong, modern, aggressively righteous fundamentalists of all three faiths represent "a retreat from God." She views as inevitable a move away from the idea of a personal God who behaves like a larger version of ourselves, and welcomes the grouping of believers toward a notion of God that "works for us in the empirical age." 25,000 first printing; BOMC alternate.
Carlhole
 
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby rwwff » Fri 08 Sep 2006, 08:20:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rwwff', 'A')n interesting point that got drilled into me in college financial accounting; forever is 30 years.. If you can show something will work out to thirty years, you've shown forever.


By that token, anything that happened more that 30 years ago is similarly irrelevant, for example any time when we didn't have a fiat currency.....


Exactly. And you know whats funny, or maybe sickening depending on how you look at it, it is in fact completely irrelevant that there existed a time when the US didn't use a fiat currency.

To be fair though, the comment in the class was about forward looking plans. From an accounting standpoint, looking forward more than 30 years is a pointless exercise.

So now, and probably till underverse comes, the dollar is and will be a fiat currency, strictly based upon the FAITH of the holder that someone else may find that currency worth something at the time they go to spend it.

So which is easier to believe in, a religion with hundreds of years of history and tradition behind it, or a green piece of valued paper that a handful of people can arbitrarily choose to print a lot more of at a completely inconsequential cost??
abundance fleeting
men falling like hungry leaves
decay masters all
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby Atlantean_Relic » Fri 08 Sep 2006, 09:30:16

But our green fiat paper was started after the invention of modern science, so its all good! :roll:
Was a long and dark December
When the banks became cathedrals
And the fog
Became God
User avatar
Atlantean_Relic
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon 24 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: North of Id, west of Oz, and infront of the damned rabbit

Re: We can believe

Unread postby Heineken » Fri 08 Sep 2006, 09:50:56

We tend to believe that which induces or preserves a sense of comfort, security, and continuity. We tend to reject everything else.

It's that simple.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: We can believe

Unread postby clueless » Fri 08 Sep 2006, 12:02:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he same person can believe contradictory things. For example Jesus tells us to both get rid of our swords and get some more. Matt 26:52, Luke 22:36.


Luk 22:36 Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

Jesus in no way instructs the disciples to bear arms in aggression, He is simply telling them to make normal preparations for their journey...A knife or similiar cutting instrument was "Standard Operating Procedure" for folks taking a journey in those days.

Remember RogerHB when interpreting Bible Scripture the first rule of thumb is Context, Context, Context !

Joh 10:26-28 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you. (27) My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: (28. And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
Last edited by clueless on Fri 08 Sep 2006, 12:42:03, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby clueless » Fri 08 Sep 2006, 12:12:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sciencegirl', '[')img]http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d17/KittySwingsUp/Good%20Funny%20Stuff/IGaveMyselfToJesus.jpg[/img]


Sorry sciencegirl, My computer does not dispay JPG's so you will have to take a chance and write out your insults...I know this is difficult for you because people make light of your ignorance, but I promise not to insult you OK ?? Go ahead you can do it , just type it on MS word , reread it several times and hit spell check, everything will be just fine.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place
Top

Re: We can believe

Unread postby clueless » Fri 08 Sep 2006, 12:51:54

Actually guys you are all wrong about Christianity in this regard of something being repeated enough times will eventually be believed.

Christianity is madness and foolishness - The true message (as opposed to the false message of Swaggart, Robertson, Popes etc.) of Christianity is so outrageous it takes a miracle to believe it. It is not hard to believe, it is practically impossible to believe.

Luk 10:21 In that hour Jesus rejoiced in Spirit and said, I thank You, Father, Lord of Heaven and earth, that You have hidden these things from the sophisticated and cunning, and have revealed them to babes. Yes, Father, for so it was pleasing before You.

Perhaps one of the greatest miracles is the fact that the best selling book of all time (the Bible) is a book that says mankind is doomed to eternal hell and is in need of a saviour. Not exaclty a popular message the masses would want to run out to Borders and buy.
User avatar
clueless
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Just the right place

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron