by rwwff » Fri 25 Aug 2006, 14:39:16
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Miki', 'H')mmm...I guess the French Revolution attests otherwise; the same applies to the violence in LatinAmerica, where armed robbery is always targeted at those who belong to the middle/upper classes. Whenever the poor tried to steal other poor, they were not sent to the police---the people of their poor community took care of them, and quite violently.
Its hard to prove really; and it is certainly the case that when Jose CEO is abducted the media notices. But do they notice when Maria and her two kids in a small hut next to a plantation, who haven't eaten 500 cal/day each in over a year simply do not get up for work the next morning?
In the French revolutions, sure they got some bigwigs, chopped off their heads, made a big show. Did anyone go around and count the number of folks in the countryside that quietly starved to death, or those that died in Napolean's army later. Do you think that army was made up of aristocracy?
Yes, more famous rich people died, than famous poor people.
That is only true because there are virtually no famous poor people.