My goodness, Seahorse, you do make lots of assumptions. We know where assumptions lead, don’t we?
I most certainly am not a Tarzan, mythical or otherwise. Nor do I wish to be. You refer to such things as 911 and the police, as examples – in my city, a frantic call to 911 will result in an officer being dispatched within 30 minutes or so. Unless one is like the two young women who called during an attempted home invasion, and whose call was simply ignored. That event got the dispatcher a day off without pay. Courts issue orders routinely, which are regularly ignored; people sometimes die as a result. And now you imply that it’s something special to adopt a dubious view of such institutions?
That doesn’t get into the darker matters, such as the realities of city revenue. Illegal gambling machines are a case in point. Haven’t you ever wondered why some unlawful establishments are raided while others are not? Have you thought about the implications when a police dispatcher is arrested for possession and distribution of illegal drugs? Have you considered what it means when a (now ex) jail guard commits murder?
The U.S. Constitution is, largely, exactly as you describe it – a scrap of paper, largely ignored and generally subverted. The rest of the items you mention can be amusing diversions, but they’re hardly necessary. None of this is representative of “toughness” intrinsically; it is realism. Seeing the world as it is.
Be assured that I lock the doors at night. I am alert in parking lots. I take different routes to and from my various destinations, avoiding patterns. I check my rearview mirror often. Fear is a most useful tool – understand it, control it, and subordinate it to will, and it serves well. Those who claim to be without fear are (mostly) liars. Those few who are not liars are fools, and they will be dead soon enough.
One’s toughness – or lack of it – is indeterminate over a computer. So is courage. It is thus for you, for me – and, for that matter, for any other poster. It is hardly useful to speculate on the subject; though I suppose it as no greater waste of time than the plays you mention.
You come back to door locks or 911. They don’t work today. Why anyone would assume these artifacts of our society would work tomorrow beggars belief. Last month, a Mexican (Mexican national) police commander was shot and taken to the hospital in Nueva Laredo, about 150 miles south of where I live. The criminals then returned to the hospital and pumped 37 rounds from an AK-47 (a real one, not a semi-auto) into him. Do you think that I believe a lock or the local police could stop that?
I saw Red Dawn, many years ago. It was silly.
Since you were kind enough to offer me some suggestions, I will extend the same courtesy. You, Miki, and others think the festivities in Lebanon are some great disaster. They are not. Not so long ago, a tsunami killed something like 200,000 people. Within weeks, the efforts of various dedicated amateurs replaced the losses. Today, nobody speaks of it. Nobody cares. So, 1,000 people died in Lebanon. I think those losses will be replaced too. Is that wounding? Perhaps. But it is also the truth.
You – more so than Miki – read this site and, I suppose, understand the implications. While Lebanon may be the spark that lights a fuse, leading to the oilgeddon you refer to, it does not rate a chapter – it is worthy of a paragraph at most. I think you and she would be well served by reflection on what’s coming. You would also be wise to ask yourself whether your beliefs in any of the institutions or other accouterments of our present civilization are well founded. Your post leads me to believe that you have yet to embrace reality fully. The time grows short.
Oh, and Miki - I wouldn't be shaking like Jello if my country were being bombarded. I would simply depart. When the going gets tough, the smart people take a vacation. Costa Rica is lovely, you know.
