[Kylon]

My question is this- Why would a woman marry a thugish retard if she's very attractive, if she can just get a thuggish retard to screw her for fun. Thugish retards are not a rare commodity, and they are on the rise. So she could have, you know, friends with benefits.

What she should do, is she is really into this sort of thing, is marry some more stable guy, probably not someone who is a very good looking, or high status guy, but one who can provide emotional stability, and she would provide part of her income, and sex, in exchange for security. The reason she would choose a lesser man, is it would be known, that on the side, she would have boyfriends.

Then she gets constant companionship with someone stable, secure, and supportive, and she gets her thug love(which is really just thug sex). Best of both worlds, and it's okay, so long as her husband knows, and agrees to allow her action on the side.

Or she could get a guy who is stable, and at her level of intelligence, and abilities and economic status, and both of them could have side action. They could both have friends with benefits, but they could both come home to someone who was supportive, intelligent, and secure. Best of both worlds for both parties(except the thug, who won't get what he doesn't deserve, which is free room and board).

That seems the more logical choice, is she is just going to get some thug love on the side.

Another good aspect of this, is that if she wants to have kids, she can have kids with someone of better genetic material, and who would make a better father, than some thug. This would ultimately break the cycle of abusive husbands. The woman marrys a man who agrees with her on seeing other people for sexual benefits, but stays with her for emotional, financial, support, child producing, child rearing and security purposes, and both of them stay married, but screw other people who they find more sexually attractive. Best of both worlds.

BTW- Those of you who think that I'm being nasty, and that sex out of marriage is bad, consider the alternative- An endless blood line of abusive thug husbands, who take advantage of women, and treat them like garbage. This way, it breaks the line. The child doesn't have a thug daddy, and so she isn't attracted to thugs, and so then the child marrys a much nicer guy. If every woman attracted to thugs did this, within like 2-3 generations, we would see alot less attraction to abusive types, as well as alot less thugs going around, because if thugs don't have kids, then there won't be as many thugs in the future.

[oowolf]

"superfluous?" Gaia the bitch goddess will determine redundancy. Sitting at my Bill Gates donated library computer, I'm sometimes distracted by nubile "teeny-boppers" (I can't think of a more contemporary term) sitting and squirming on either side-and rendered almost insensate by their cheap industrial grade petro-perfume they apparently bathe in, mixed with their tragic nearness.

Twaddle and gossip; the woe of the "civilized", appears to be their reason for existing. I think: These will likely never know what they should have been, i.e. real humans.

Ishi, the last sane human on the continent, died in 1916. I'm no Ishi and never will be. But I at least know what I should have been. Alas.