Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Does the topic of Peak Oil receive fair treatment at PO.com?

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

The General Mood of PO.com is:

Cornucopian (Happy Days Lie Ahead)
0
0%
Positive (PO.com leaves people feeling generally good about the future)
1
No votes
Middle of the Road (PO.com is fairly balanced)
19
No votes
Negative (PO.com leaves people feeling generally bad about the future)
35
No votes
Doomer (Nothing But Death and Destruction Ahead)
15
No votes
Undecided
1
No votes
Other (please explain below)
1
No votes
 
Total votes : 72

Does the topic of Peak Oil receive fair treatment at PO.com?

Unread postby TheTurtle » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 08:40:01

Hello. My name's Turtle and I am a Doomer ...

I know Doomers who have stopped visiting PO.com because they felt like everyone who posts here has their collective heads in the sand.

I know Cornucopians who no longer visit PO.com because they felt like nobody is willing to entertain any possible future that doesn't include 95% destruction of the human race.

I know Middle-of-the-Roaders who have pulled away from PO.com because they believed one or the other of the previous two statements.

I would like to poll the PO.com membership and find what is the overall perception of this place. I am not interested in whether or not you think the future is rosy or dark. I am interested in how you perceive the overall atmosphere of PO.com comes across. So, even though I personally think that we are in for a world of hurt in the near future, I consistently find this place to be more positive than my own beliefs and so my vote goes toward the upper half of the poll.

In other words, I would like to know if you think a first time visitor will find balance here or will they feel PO.com is biased one way or the other?

Thanks for your participation. :-D
Last edited by TheTurtle on Fri 14 Jul 2006, 10:45:16, edited 1 time in total.
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi

Re: How do you perceive the overall mood at PO.com?

Unread postby Zardoz » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 09:02:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', '.')..I would like to know if you think a first time visitor will find balance here or will they feel PO.com is biased one way or the other?...


I can't see how anyone would consider the site to be "biased" when any sort of opinion is welcome to be posted and explained in depth. Sure, the place is crawling with Lovelock disciples (like me) but that doesn't stop cornucopians and middle-of-the-roaders from having their say.

The site's purpose is to explore the ramifications of the end of the oil age. That means we spend a lot of time talking about the many bad things that are going to happen. We're dealing with a harsh reality, and if the discussions tend towards doom-and-gloomism, they're only reflecting that reality.

The site isn't "biased", it's "realistic".
"Thank you for attending the oil age. We're going to scrape what we can out of these tar pits in Alberta and then shut down the machines and turn out the lights. Goodnight." - seldom_seen
User avatar
Zardoz
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 6323
Joined: Fri 02 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Oil-addicted Southern Californucopia

Re: How do you perceive the overall mood at PO.com?

Unread postby Heineken » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 09:44:42

Although Turtle attempts to clarify this (albeit inconsistently) in the survey response options, I still think that people who take this survey will tend to be confused as to whether the "mood" refers to the general attitudes of PO members as reflected in their posts, the perceived bias of the news stories, or both. Also, "mood" is not really the same thing as "bias," but "bias" seems to be what the poll is trying to get at. Alas, both words are used in the survey. So I regard this survey as flawed by poor design---a criticism I would levy at many of the PO.com surveys.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: How do you perceive the overall mood at PO.com?

Unread postby Fergus » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 10:42:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'A')lthough Turtle attempts to clarify this (albeit inconsistently) in the survey response options, I still think that people who take this survey will tend to be confused as to whether the "mood" refers to the general attitudes of PO members as reflected in their posts, the perceived bias of the news stories, or both. Also, "mood" is not really the same thing as "bias," but "bias" seems to be what the poll is trying to get at. Alas, both words are used in the survey. So I regard this survey as flawed by poor design---a criticism I would levy at many of the PO.com surveys.


I think that this is a pretty mddle of the road site. Sure you have the negitive side, but come on, this is a negitive situation. The overall mood considering we face a life changing situation is realitively calm and cool here. The 'prepare for the future' thread is probably the gloomiest, but also the most entertaining and rewarding aswell.

Considering the effect oil will have on our way of life and the changes it is perceived to have on us, yeah, this site is pretty middle of the road if you ask me.
User avatar
Fergus
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006, 03:00:00

Re: How do you perceive the overall mood at PO.com?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 10:43:34

Sounds like his main point is that people he knows don't like reading here anymore. But I'll bet the recent run up of oil prices is leading to or has already caused another upsurge in hits to this site.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: How do you perceive the overall mood at PO.com?

Unread postby TheTurtle » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 10:43:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'S')o I regard this survey as flawed by poor design---a criticism I would levy at many of the PO.com surveys.


Guilty as charged, I suppose. :oops:

As Zardoz implies, the mere fact that someone comes to PO.com suggests that they have heard about Peak Oil and are concerned about it; otherwise, why bother?

Accordingly, the "mood" at PO is one of concern? worry? fear? due to the very nature of the phenomenon itself and is irrelevant to my question (in fact, I am going to change the subject line to something more apt).

What I was trying to ascertain is whether or not PO.com members feel that the site attempts to give a balanced view of the issues involved (as balanced as possible, considering the issue itself, of course).
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi

Re: How do you perceive the overall mood at PO.com?

Unread postby NEOPO » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 10:49:33

I chose "other" because "excited" was not a choice ;-)
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: Does the topic of Peak Oil receive fair treatment at PO.

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 11:43:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I') chose all of the above because I distribute, categorize, sort, analyze, store, and recall data in my brain on a regular basis. Because of this all this "thinking" on the "earth" my assumptions and presumptions, deductions and inductions, reductions and inducements all change on a regular basis. Given that, I think we f*&ked next wednesday :lol:
heh heh, you can analyse, scrutinize, inspect, detect, reject, object, genuflect, classify, mortify, reify, stupify, cheer, jeer, leer, fear; we're still f*&ked next Wednesday!
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: How do you perceive the overall mood at PO.com?

Unread postby nth » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 11:44:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Zardoz', '
')
The site's purpose is to explore the ramifications of the end of the oil age. That means we spend a lot of time talking about the many bad things that are going to happen. We're dealing with a harsh reality, and if the discussions tend towards doom-and-gloomism, they're only reflecting that reality.

The site isn't "biased", it's "realistic".


The site's purpose is to explore the ramifications of the end of the oil age. That in itself is pessimistic. This site is pessimistic to say the least. Most people here are pessimistic. Only a handful here will argue against PO and its gloomy future. For those few, they get clobbered with personal attacks and also told that they are the same person as previous anti-PO or anti-gloom.

I think the people who post here are bias, so making the site bias. Reality is not doom and gloom. Most experts and common folks don't believe in doom and gloom. It is just a handful of us in this world that feel that way. Historically, there have been many groups like us who claim end of our current way of life to be substituted with more mediocrity standard way of life, but history proves that we are wrong again and again.

The way I see it, if we are just right once, then we be heading towards the Dark Ages and that happen to societies several times in history, too!
User avatar
nth
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1978
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: How do you perceive the overall mood at PO.com?

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 11:56:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nth', '
')Historically, there have been many groups like us who claim end of our current way of life to be substituted with more mediocrity standard way of life, but history proves that we are wrong again and again.
sure, people have been saying we're going to run out of oil since the 19th century. Never happened yet, so relax! :-D
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Does the topic of Peak Oil receive fair treatment at PO.

Unread postby rogerhb » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 17:51:48

The site nicely encapsulates the uncertainty of the future.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Does the topic of Peak Oil receive fair treatment at PO.

Unread postby Pops » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 18:57:35

Good idea Turtle, of course the folks that respond seem to have an average post count around 1500 – not really a random sample of new readers nor the unbiased.

I’ve mentioned several times that I think Dan had reservation about the PO.com being viewed as a survivalist site – with all those bad connotations, but what we seem to have become is more of a fatalist site – the opposite of a realist site as was mentioned.

Realism implies that we can discern reality – in this case the reality is masked.
Fatalism implies that events are inevitable – there is nothing to do but watch, and maybe guess at the timeline.

As was recently posted elsewhere:
Here are my questions:
What are you doing?
How are you living now if you are concerned about peak oil?
Are there answers or solutions?
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Does the topic of Peak Oil receive fair treatment at PO.

Unread postby Aaron » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 19:10:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')’ve mentioned several times that I think Dan had reservation about the PO.com being viewed as a survivalist site – with all those bad connotations, but what we seem to have become is more of a fatalist site – the opposite of a realist site as was mentioned.


I disagree.

This site, like any community is what it's members contribute.

Nobody gets silenced based on their belief system, despite what some will claim. I have defended unpopular posters around here many times as you know. And I would never tolerate any forced bias system.

Have some left because they felt outnumbered by the opposition?

Perhaps so... on all sides.

But that's what forums do... unless you rigidly enforce conduct rules about posting.

Last I checked the discourse is defined by the offerings...

...& nothing else.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Re: Does the topic of Peak Oil receive fair treatment at PO.

Unread postby Pops » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 19:37:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', 'N')obody gets silenced based on their belief system, despite what some will claim. I have defended unpopular posters around here many times as you know. And I would never tolerate any forced bias system.

I do know, but that wasn’t my point

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', 'T')his site, like any community is what it's members contribute.

Last I checked the discourse is defined by the offerings...

The potluck is what it is regardless of who sets up the tables.

The fare being offered is lots of talk and little action as the post I cited mentions.

That is my point.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Does the topic of Peak Oil receive fair treatment at PO.

Unread postby Lore » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 19:53:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')he fare being offered is lots of talk and little action as the post I cited mentions.


Have to agree, not sure if this is just youthful malaise or true lack of conviction on some contributor’s parts.

So quit bitchen and get up and do something! Right or wrong convert your talk into action. Then come back and tell us about it.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet
Top

Re: Does the topic of Peak Oil receive fair treatment at PO.

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 19:53:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', ' ')what we seem to have become is more of a fatalist site
To paraphrase Clarence "Frogman" Henry:

I'm a fatalistic boy
I aint got no farm

woo oo wuh oo wuh oo oo wuh oo

Aint got no MREs
Aint got no million rounds o' ammo

I'm a fatalistic boy
I aint got no farm
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Does the topic of Peak Oil receive fair treatment at PO.

Unread postby Lore » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 20:36:21

And to paraphrase Bruce Cockburn

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') don't believe in guarded borders and I don't believe in hate
I don't believe in generals or their stinking torture states
And when I talk with the survivors of things too sickening to relate
If I had a rocket launcher...I would retaliate
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet
Top

Re: Does the topic of Peak Oil receive fair treatment at PO.

Unread postby MonteQuest » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 21:24:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'T')he fare being offered is lots of talk and little action as the post I cited mentions.

That is my point.


As Aaron pointed out, the discourse is defined by the offerings. We all bring something different to the forum. It has been clear from the start where I stand and what my agenda on peakoil.com has been:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Montequest', 'W')hile I don't claim to have the definitive word on the peak oil debate, I do feel I have touched on issues that others have not. I write to stimulate thought, and to try to explain the parameters and natural laws which must govern the debate as we discuss solutions and consider the alternatives to our imminent energy decline.


As to actions, follow me around as the Executive Committee Energy Chair for the Sierra Club here in Arizona or the Site admin for http://sustainablearizona.org and a key member of their Steering Committee. Follow me to the numerous speaking engagements and powerpoint presentations on renewable energies and sustainable lifestyles I present on my own dime.

Most of my writings are aimed at the lurkers. I personally feel that I can best contribute here by promoting a broad awareness of the peakoil issues.

On the other hand, you feel you can contribute best by what you do in the Planning forum and by real example in your lifestyle changes.

Fine. Call it a team effort. We cover the bases.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Next

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron