by emersonbiggins » Fri 14 Jul 2006, 11:45:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SoothSayer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'N')o, I realize
why they're hitting the airport. My question is why has it taken
three days of bombing to do it? It's not like 747s can successfully navigate a pockmarked runway. A few hours of heavy shelling should do the trick, not three days' worth. That's excessive, in my mind.
(Not that I've spent time demolishing runways, mind you...

)
You can use light bombs to crater a runway ... but then you need anti-personnel mines scatter dropped to put off the crater filling crews.
However if you use a REAL runway buster, you fire a large warhead THROUGH the concrete so that it lifts a huge scab and makes a crater 25 or more feet across. Very difficult to fill.
Israel used a pair of runway busters (Durandals?) initially ... so perhaps any further attacks etc are designed to stop repair crews?
Perhaps I have misunderstood the tolerance of some planes to land on damaged runways. Normally, I would think that two Durendals would put a runway out of commission for
aircraft for several weeks, if not months. Certainly what is going on there now is sufficient to deter aircraft from using the facility.
Oh well, they know better than I, and assuredly so.