Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

A question - a question that needs answering

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby Jacksoncage » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 00:13:04

This one goes out to the doomer camp:

We're all pretty well screwed, right? Oil is peaking, and no alternatives can possibly replace it on such a scale. Industrial civilization will collapse; global anarchy will ensue as countries struggle to find oil, and people struggle to find food. All hell is going to break loose over the next 20 years.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say that the people here are a cross-section of society : old, young, rich, poor, all colors, all cultures, all religions, and various nationalities. As such, there are many here that have money to buy land, but there are others who don't. Those few who do possess the liquid assets are less likely to have enough money to buy land and actually use it to sustain their wellbeing for them and their families. I am easily one of these people, being of a lower-middle class family. This is a question to those people who cannot afford their land or cannot independently sustain themselves. If the next 20 years are going to be as rough as you say they will, and most of humanity is going to die off within the next 50, what keeps you going? Do you honestly believe that the global catastrophe will somehow bypass you?

What's the point in living if you think the future will be a living hell? Or do you have some doubts as to whether or not you are right, so you're simply waiting it out to see if this catastrophe does come to pass? Basically, are you just sticking around to see if you (and all doomers) are full of it or not?

If you submit that civilization will end soon and most of humanity will die, then you must be humble enough to realize that there's a hell of a chance of you dying too.

NOTE: Ask yourselves some tough questions:If I truly believe that civilization will collapse and most of my friends, family and likely myself will die, why do I continue on? Am I to believe that this "crisis" will bypass me, or do I doubt all these prognostications on the inside and am willing to "wait it all out"?

{edited by MQ to remove disruptive content}
User avatar
Jacksoncage
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat 08 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby willjones4 » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 00:35:33

These thoughts have often fed upon my mind. I, too, am from a lower middle class strata. I have no doubt that things will continue to get harder for people in my situation. However, I also know that my existence is all I have and that when I die I cease to exist. Therefore it is hardwired into the core of my brain to survive at all cost. Those costs may escalate but so, too, will my desire to survive. Its gonna get ugly but nonexistance is the only other choice and that is against all that we are. I think there will be a great many surprises in the coming times. One of them may be that people like myself find themselves servants/defenders of the wealthy or members of roving bands that prey on them. Who knows. We'll live however we can and then we'll die.
User avatar
willjones4
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby paoniapbud » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 00:41:30

It will be tough yes, but many people will find a way to survive. Just because people call themselves doomers(I do) it doesn't necessarily mean that they think the end will come to all civilization. I think our WAY of life is doomed. Our bloated, suicidal, hit the brick wall lifestyles are doomed.

So if you are asking me if I should kill my way of life I will tell you that I'm like most everyone else: Getting in while the getting is good. I want all of the vacations, weekend trips, new mountain bikes, etc. that I can fit in while I can. Unsustainable you may say? Well yes, and so is nearly everyone's lifestyle on PO.com. Yes, even solar house people living in the desert have unsustainable lifestyles. Eventually those solar panels do go bad!

:razz:
"God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him." -Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
paoniapbud
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon 17 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Colorado

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby rwwff » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 00:47:13

I think I kinda qualify as a long term doomer. I don't believe in crashing economies right after peak, but that doesn't change the awareness of overshoot and its consequences. (see population reduction threads).

So why continue, why try to survive?

A population bottleneck is a lottery that you can impact with skill; and the prize is blood immortality. Every one of us, sitting, reading, and eating here, carry the "blood" of just a very few people who made it through the previous bottleneck. They are alive in us; they are physically immortal. If the bottleneck of the post oil world is brutal enough, powerful enough; you to may achieve that status of immortal.

cue music..
roll stills


It is the True Game of survivor.

cue drums. :P

Real answer..

The purpose of life is to see your child(ren) prosper; whatever that happens to mean in their time. To take joy in their successes, and comfort them when they fail; so that they can do the same when it is their time.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby rogerhb » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 00:55:46

1. The survival gene is very strong, species that don't have it don't tend to, er, survive.

2. We are all going to die anyway, the trick to life is postponing the final day.

3. Having a family means you take responsibility for them, so even if you think things are dire, you still carry on.

4. Not being a religious person there is no afterlife promising to make everything easier, this is all we have.

5. I'm just very curious as to what will happen next.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby paoniapbud » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 01:03:21

I'm the opposite. No or fewer children, fewer liabilities. :cry:
"God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him." -Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
paoniapbud
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 92
Joined: Mon 17 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Colorado

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby Graeme » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 01:36:31

Jacksoncage, I started a "suicide" thread sometime ago. You might like to look at the comments there especially the initial article I posted about this:

http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic16393.html

The article by Florida State University Bright-Burton Professor of Psychology Thomas Joiner says that community involvement and family are important.

BTW, We are far from "screwed" as you put it. A lot of people are working hard to change our energy sources from fossil fuels to renewables. Change is happening but it will take some time before we are totally weaned off oil. Just have a look around this board. Not everybody is pessimistic about our future. Just hang in there and don't despair.
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby Jacksoncage » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 01:40:29

Hey buddy, I don't subscribe to the doomer viewpoint at all. This seems to be a dangerous proclamation on this board, as the ire of every doomer/"realist" is drawn upon almost anyone who doesn't agree with the lockstep rank-and-file doomer ideology.

It should be noted that I tried my best to illustrate the doomer viewpoint without being cartoonish or insulting. But I, however am not a doomer. I haven't been for quite some time. :)

I have good reason to not be one as well. My family has a history in the oil industry on my dad's side, and my mom comes from a long line of environmentalists and alternative energy activists. An odd pairing, to be sure, but it gives me reasons daily to be optimistic.
User avatar
Jacksoncage
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat 08 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby Graeme » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 01:48:58

Good for you. Sorry I misunderstood. But there are people lurking and posting on this board who are feeling depressed about the propect of anarchy in our society. I was trying to reach those people.
Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe. H. G. Wells.
Fatih Birol's motto: leave oil before it leaves us.
User avatar
Graeme
Fusion
Fusion
 
Posts: 13258
Joined: Fri 04 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby MattSavinar » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 01:55:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Graeme', 'G')ood for you. Sorry I misunderstood. But there are people lurking and posting on this board who are feeling depressed about the propect of anarchy in our society. I was trying to reach those people.


Graeme,

This topic deserves more attention. However, I don't think discounting the probability of widespread poverty, chaos, anarchy here in the states is the way to do it.

Half the world lives on less than $2 a day. Poverty, chaos, anarchy, etc. are the rule not the exception for the majority of the world's 6.5 billion people. Why do they keep on living? What gives them a purpose?

The only difference in the future will be that we in the states and rest of the developed world will not have the energy surplus that lifted us from the poverty, anarchy, etc. that has plagued most of the world. Rather than persuade ourselves that we are immune to what happens to most of humanity, why not attempt to figure out ways to carve out a satisfactory existence of it?

Best,

Matt
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 01:57:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jacksoncage', '
')
NOTE: Ask yourselves some tough questions: if I truly believe that civilization will collapse and most of my friends, family and likely myself will die, why do I continue on? Am I to believe that this "crisis" will bypass me, or do I doubt all these prognostications on the inside and am willing to "wait it all out"?


You pick out the extreme and play it up as the norm?

If you think using the extreme "doomer" position is the best thing to attack, then have at it. But don't expect any serious discussions back to troll bait like that.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby Jacksoncage » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 02:13:35

Inflation will become endemic and a world depression will descend upon us. Every year, unrelentingly, we will require further efficiencies in our energy use; our slice of the pie will get smaller and smaller. Whole industries will disappear: motor racing, fast food, motels, private boats and airplanes, and all related industries. We will cut and pare and try to grow our way out of it under our current debt-based monetary system (since it is all we have) but it will not happen. People in Third World countries, like Mexico, will do the only human thing, the thing we all would do in their circumstances--try to get into countries they perceive have wealth and jobs and energy. We will see more imperialist adventures, and, it will add to U.S. isolation as we continue down the path of becoming a pariah nation.

"all we have"

"imperialist adventures"

"pariah nation"

I am sorry, but these are not the words of a moderate. You will probably openly admit that everything not science-related in the above passage are all left of center politically - which, by the way, wearing your political leanings on your shoulder hurts anyone's credibility when discussing science, as I'm sure you know. A moderate in the peak oil world you are not either, as you maintain that the population must decrease dramatically - people outside this site largely do not believe this is necessary (and no, I'm not talking about just POD). Quite honestly this passage merely reaffirms to me that doomerism is not a poison ideology to you:

At this point, depending on how seriously the human population has altered it's carrying capacity(as a die-off usually decimates the species environment), we will either adapt or we could die out altogether if alternative food-energy sources are not found and the environment restored. We wouldn't be the first large mammal or human to do so. If we reduce our consumption of energy(powerdown) so that we could meet demand with renewables, then we just might stabilize at a lower population level over time, by attrition, with minimal tragic die-off.

To me, you hold all the main tenets of doomerism to be true: die-off, wars for resources, a Greater Depression, etc. I simply believe it doesn't have to be that way and that a moderate would be a little more open-minded.
Last edited by Jacksoncage on Sun 09 Jul 2006, 02:17:37, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jacksoncage
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat 08 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby MattSavinar » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 02:16:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jacksoncage', '
')NOTE: Ask yourself this:If I truly believe that civilization will collapse and most of my friends, family and likely myself will die, why do I continue on? Am I to believe that this "crisis" will bypass me, or do I doubt all these prognostications on the inside and am willing to "wait it all out"?

{edited by MQ to remove disruptive content}


JC,

We are a short term oriented species. If I had confirmation that within 4 weeks all hell was going to break lose I might just throw in the towel. But I happen to think the next 4 weeks might be quite enjoyable, at least for me personally. There may even be a few opportunities to pass on my genes.

It sounds to me like you need to take a break for a while. Your brain is in the process of rewiring itself in a way that it can reconcile your awareness of these issues with your short-term day to day life. That rewiring process generally results in the person deciding this information is invalid (the "reformed doomer") or simply acepting and reconciling it (the "acceptance" phase). But it can be a strenous process, whatever the result.

The "reformed doomer", I believe, is somebody whose subconscious realized they were simply better off by not understanding these issues. If after coming across this information, a person is unable to function or maintain their social network, they are likely better off mentally writing it off as "doomer gibberish" or something along those lines. Basically the subconscious will then "delete, deny, or rationalize" away the information that was threatening the person's short-term survival. However, given the complex and volatile nature of this information, the mind can have a lot of trouble deciding how to deal with this info, what actually is in the person's best interest, etc. It sounds to me like you're in that stage.

I'm as doomeristic as it gets and I suspect that had I not found ways to use this information to my own short term benefit, my mind would have found some (perhaps creative) ways to delete, deny, or rationalize away my fears.

You're mind will likely do the same: either it will find ways for you to benefit short term in which case you will go into the "acceptance" phase, or your mind will find ways to delete, deny, or rationalize away your fears in which case you'll become a "reformed doomer."

There's lots of people in both clubs, so either way you'll have lots of company, at least on the net.

Best,

Matt
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 02:36:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jacksoncage', ' ')To me, you hold all the main tenets of doomerism to be true: die-off, wars for resources, a Greater Depression, etc. I simply believe it doesn't have to be that way and that a moderate would be a little more open-minded.


Then you have no idea of the worse. While I may state these things, I surely don't believe "civilization will collapse and most of my friends, family and likely myself will die". Instead, I believe we will see a dramatic drop in our standard of living here in the western world with a decrease in longevity. That is a very moderate position compared to Mad-Max.

Civilization, as we know it ,will not be able to continue. There will be hreat diress and chaos, but civilization will continue on, albeit in a much different manner. We aren't going back to the caves.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby rwwff » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 02:37:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jacksoncage', 'T')o me, you hold all the main tenets of doomerism to be true: die-off, wars for resources, a Greater Depression, etc. I simply believe it doesn't have to be that way and that a moderate would be a little more open-minded.


A moderate would understand that little people such as you and I are not going to be altering the course of THIS ship. It will do as it wills. Just relax and be flexible; don't demand that it go northeast or southeast; if it goes northeast, get out the parka, and if it goes southeast be ready for the heat.

In any event, the hostility in your message does little to encourage others to see this issue from your point of view.
User avatar
rwwff
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2601
Joined: Fri 28 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 02:43:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jacksoncage', ' ')A moderate in the peak oil world you are not either, as you maintain that the population must decrease dramatically - people outside this site largely do not believe this is necessary (and no, I'm not talking about just POD).


Hardly. Over the last 35 years, I have worked closely with numerous biologists, ecologists, and people of academia who universally agree that we must reduce the population to a sustainable level. Studies show that median estimate to be 2.5 to 5 billion people.

Many people dismiss this but fail to understand the biology behind it.

"The cumulative biotic potential of any given species always exceeds the carrying capacity of it's environment."

We are not immune. Our population bubble will be corrrected.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby Jacksoncage » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 02:46:07

How many pyschology courses did you take in high school? College?

Matt, I've read your site. I've read thousands of sites related to peak oil, global warming and alternative energy. Some are blogs, some are activist sites, and others are the sites of AE/PO/GW-related companies.

I've spent the last four years reading up on all of these different topics. I read your book, Simmons' book, Yergin's book, even Jimmy Kunstler's, and as many others as I could. I even read Al Gore's latest.

I've come to a conclusion. There is jack-shit that I can do about any of this on a global scale. I am condemned to wait, and watch events unfold. I watch the news, I check the settled price of oil, and on my daily walks I see gas prices. I walk around town and see what folks are doing about them.

Every now and then I go the nearest major city and see what people are doing about them there.

And I must say, I walk away impressed. It isn't one singular thing that causes me to be optimistic, it's a constant flow of information and knowledge of my surroundings that tells me that people will adapt. There will be no singular, overnight, cataclysmic switch from oil. These things take time, money and ingenuity. It is often argued that humanity doesn't have much of the first. We shall see. It's fact that many don't personally have much of the second. Whether this becomes a pandemic in America also remains to be seen. It's a given that the third is abundant. We wouldn't have gotten where we are today without it. I remain optimistic, but cautious, having read all of the books I can on these topics which concern our future. Deletion and denial do not enter into my thought process.
User avatar
Jacksoncage
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat 08 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 02:52:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jacksoncage', ' ')There is jack-shit that I can do about any of this on a global scale.


Welcome to the club. However, you can help educate people about it and provide a living example by powering down.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here will be no singular, overnight, cataclysmic switch from oil. .


No, and therein lies the rub. Peak oil is tomorrow in planning terms.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 02:56:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Jacksoncage', ' ')These things take time, money and ingenuity. It is often argued that humanity doesn't have much of the first. We shall see. It's fact that many don't personally have much of the second. Whether this becomes a pandemic in America also remains to be seen. It's a given that the third is abundant. .


The third is abundant, but useless unless you have the energy to bring it to fruition. Read my Energy and the Mother of Invention thread.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: A question - a question that needs answering

Unread postby gego » Sun 09 Jul 2006, 03:02:00

You ask, "Why go on?" I say, "Why not?"

When the Titanic sank, the lifeboats were allocated mostly to the first class passengers, but some of the first class passengers went down with the ship and some of the other class passengers got on lifeboats.

We do not all have the same odds of survival, but we all have some odds. Just the fact that you were born shows that you once beat hugh odds against you. Think of all the other potential children that your parents could have had with the countless number of eggs your mother produced and the humongous number of sperm you dad produced. Hell, if your great grandmother would have had a headache on one fateful night your grandmother and mother and a bunch of other relatives would never have existed and neither would have you.

Why not replace your fear and desperation with excitement? Be excited that you get to be in the race. Be excited that you got to live through the peak time for the human race, and see all the worderful things that were invented. Maybe excitement will energize you to make some good decisions. (Some of the survivors of war will tell you that it was the most exciting time of their lives.)

Remember Shakespears line something to the effect that the agony is in the anticipation (talking about death). I look at it like this; I was dead before I was alive and it was a nonevent, so when I go back to being dead it is not bad, so why agonize in anticipation. The only time I can enjoy being alive is when I am alive, and the only time I can feel bad about death is when I am alive; my choice.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Next

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron