by rwwff » Mon 26 Jun 2006, 10:45:47
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'I') don't see why this constantly gets framed as an "either/or" question.
It framed either/or by both sides most of the time. If someone says, "we are currently in an unusually cold climate cycle and we've had an exceptionally long run of the cool weather, so there has always been a good chance that
homo sapiens would see the Earth's climate return to its long term average." Then all of a sudden, everyone on the blame mankind side that is persuing it for political rather than scientific reasons sees their baby slipping beneath the bathwater and they panic, and get all righteous and inflamed.
On the other hand, if one says, "the current shift in climate is caused by human activity.."; the reader is given a false impression that if we stopped the activity, the Earth would stay cold.
Think of it like a rubber band held in place by a pin. Humanities removed the pin. Rubber band's on its way forward. Putting the pin back does not recover the rubber band.