I just returned from a week at the Sustainability Institute in Vermont, founded by Donella Meadows. John Sterman presented a graphic stock and flow/graph of climate change and Elizabeth Sawin spoke about extinction (among many other things). It got me wondering...
Climate change is very real. We will see Arctic polar ice cap extinction in our lifetimes, many of us. This year, in the media there was a plea from one of the Arctic tribes to stop global climate change by doing something about fossil fuel combustion. There are plenty of credible warnings. The science is unimpeachable that we see the impacts years after human-induced CO2 releases actually reach the stratosphere (troposphere?). So, even after we curtail CO2 releases it will be some 20 years before the primary impacts are mitigated. It is happening above our heads. Repeat: It is happening right now.
We know this. So why are humans unable to respond by taking action in a remedial way? We love our children, and make sacrifices for their betterment every day. Yet we are persistently impacting their quality of life. It makes sense that we'd not engage in conduct which knowingly wreaks havoc into their world. Yet, we do.
I have a theory. In many ways, we're the genetic cumulation of our thousands of ancestors, tossed together and methodically sifted and sorted from generation to generation. We have evolved to our current state and will evolve further thru our children and theirs. We give birth, and the evolutionary dice are rolled again for yet a better match between human and earth. We die, and the less-adapted parts of our continuum over time are discarded to be remade into fresh plants, then fresh bugs, fresh lizards, fresh snakes,... you get the picture. The very thing that lets the dice of evolution keep getting rolled (death) is the very thing that causes us to have to start all over again with the process of viewing the world anew, finding new ways to solve problems and, ultimately, living to the limit of our ability to adapt.
Radical environmental and atmospheric changes cause deaths, accellerate births, cause mutations, and other "high frequency" human changes. In other words, the possibilities are played out faster in times of crisis. And there is a reason. It is all logical and rational, no matter how cruel and personal it may seem.
Look at it from the Earth's perspective. You have this dissonant organism which is vastly capable of populating the earth, but inferior in its ability to steward a balanced "place" on earth. And here is an analogy... if you get an infection, then your body manufactures a fever to kill the offensive parasite by creating conditions under which you can live, but the germ is beyond its optimal survival temperature.
So, we haven't yet as a species, managed to live in community at the level of doing what is best for the community instead of what is best for our own set of self-perpetuating genes. We haven't yet reached a universal understanding that what is good for the whole is good for the individual. Tribal peoples tend to have a fairly sophisticated understanding that community good is a principle of survival. And in this respect, randian capitalism is morally blind to an important principle of survival, although it was an effective short-term method of intraspecies competition. Doubtless, there will be other strategies equally valid in their respective historical moments, and some of which we cannot even conceive yet.
But from this rainy Spring night in northeastern Oklahoma, it seems that our fates lie in understanding peak oil and global climate abberation from an intergenerational compassion. Either way, we eventually die and our choices live on, with or without our progeny.[/i]




