Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Energy secretary Bodman says 3 more years

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

Energy secretary Bodman says 3 more years

Unread postby frankthetank » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 11:57:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')odman said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that the shortfall was a sign of a stronger economy under President Bush, but he acknowledged that, at least for now, “the suppliers have lost control of the market.”
“Suppliers are unable to make the kind of demands [on producers] to make the flow equal to the demand,” he said. “Clearly, it’s going to be a number of years, maybe two to three years, before suppliers are going to be able to keep up with those demands.”

Hey...he got something right! but on the subject of record profits...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')odman said the U.S. companies faced competition primarily from from government-owned and -controlled firms, which can manipulate market forces to their advantage. “A lot of it is controlled by what [Venezuelan President] Hugo Chavez does, for instance,” he said.

So 3 more years.... thankfully ethanol from switchgrass and nuclear for battery powered cars will be implemented by then!

link
[quote]
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby firestarter » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 12:06:48

Meet The Press

Other than Dick Durbin making a complete ass of himself, there were some interesting highlights from the show:

*Dan Yergin's outlook was as bleak as I've seen it, while still a step below his peak oiler foes.

*Sam Bodman actually spoke of $100 -$150 oil as a real possibilty at ANY TIME, even sooner than later.

*Jim Cramer advocated eliminating ethanol import tariffs as Dick Durbin teetered between dizzinessness and passing out from anger. He also did a masterful job defending Lee Raymond's golden compensation package.

*Red Cavaney spoke so much about alternative energies that I almost forgot he was an oilman.
User avatar
firestarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun 19 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby Barbara » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 12:07:08

This is serious. They're trying to buy time... a lot of time!
Didn't say "two or three weeks" as they used to do in the past. Three years is a lot.
**no english mothertongue**
--------
Objects in the rear view mirror
are closer than they appear.
Barbara
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Zoorope

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby Leanan » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 12:09:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')odman said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that the shortfall was a sign of a stronger economy under President Bush


Oh, I see. It's not a sign of something wrong, it's a sign that things are going great. :roll:
"The problems of today will not be solved by the same thinking that produced the problems in the first place." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby Eli » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 12:11:48

Matt Simmons made the point in a radio program that is on another thread, that he thinks that at some point the US government will be forced to take ownership of US Oil Companies.


I can see that happening when PO hits in full force and the profits the US companies make goes stratospheric, not just obscenely high like now.

When it becomes clear that energy is the economy not just a facet of it the government will be forced to take control of it.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby Bleep » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 12:14:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')odman said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that the shortfall was a sign of a stronger economy under President Bush


Oh, I see. It's not a sign of something wrong, it's a sign that things are going great. :roll:

Poverty is Wealth!

Starvation is Feasting!
User avatar
Bleep
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Wed 08 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby Eli » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 12:23:13

Good point Barbara.

Admitting that it will be three years until supply will be able to meet demand. 8O

That ain't good.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby firestarter » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 12:41:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')odman said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that the shortfall was a sign of a stronger economy under President Bush


Oh, I see. It's not a sign of something wrong, it's a sign that things are going great. :roll:



Other than this one or two, expected, verbal genuflections to his boss, most of what he had to say was surprisingly doomerish. I came away from the program, and especially from Bodman's candor, with the hollowed out, sick feeling in my belly being enlarged a few more centimenters.
User avatar
firestarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun 19 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby Eli » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 12:51:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('firestarter', '
')

Other than this one or two, expected, verbal genuflections to his boss, most of what he had to say was surprisingly doomerish. I came away from the program, and especially from Bodman's candor, with the hollowed out, sick feeling in my belly being enlarged a few more centimenters.


So it was good news and everything is fine, whew... that is a relief.

*goes back to murmuring incessantly to self "everything is fine, just fine" *
Last edited by Eli on Sun 30 Apr 2006, 13:02:05, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river
Top

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby TheTurtle » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 12:59:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('firestarter', '*')Red Cavaney spoke so much about alternative energies that I almost forgot he was an oilman.


He DID point out that oil provides "denser" energy than any alternative. And he did mention that production of biofuels requires the input of oil.

I watched most of the talking head programs this morning (it's raining here). So many people danced around admission of Peak Oil without actually using those words.

Peak is here, my friends. :shock:
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby firestarter » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 13:14:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Eli', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('firestarter', '
')

Other than this one or two, expected, verbal genuflections to his boss, most of what he had to say was surprisingly doomerish. I came away from the program, and especially from Bodman's candor, with the hollowed out, sick feeling in my belly being enlarged a few more centimenters.


So it was good news and everything is fine, whew... that is relief.

*goes back to murmuring incessantly to self "everything is fine, just fine" *




I didn't imply that "everything was fine". On the contrary:


A) I loathe the Bush administration

B) I loathe politicians of both parties

C) Cabinet members are are politician proxies and generally disseminate the rhetoric of those whose charge they're in.

D) Bodman's initial linking ( at the program's beginning) of a "good economy" to energy overuse was all but lost in the shuffle from his subsequent lamenting of the energy "crisis" that is upon us at present.

E) Predictably a poltician's proxie spoke out of both sides of his mouth: one side (5% of his presentation being self congradulatory), the other side (95% being incongruously candid and doomerish). 5% "fine", 95% not so fine.

F) Conclusion: even from the mouth of the presidential toady, everything's not fine.
User avatar
firestarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun 19 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby mekrob » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 13:31:50

Doesn't it seem a little wierd that they say it will be three more years, yet just at that moment, Bush is out of office? I can't think of any real significance that could have, but it just seems so wierd. I mean, basically, if it turns out to be more than three years, then it's not his fault, but the new President's.
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby Eli » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 13:52:11

I was being mordant,
there is a 10 dollar word I learned today.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '*')goes back to murmuring incessantly to self "everything is fine, just fine" *


Did you miss that part?

That line implies a person who is not in a rational state of mind.

Of late it seems clear that we are already in the midsts of the effects of PO and the news about Oil and energy is always negative. It would almost be better to go mad than face the reality of PO, that is what I was trying to get at.

Go back and read what the Hirsch report says about PO hitting before steps are taken to combat it's effects. Doing that would burn a hole right through your gut knowing now that PO is already here upon our heads.

The Hirsch report is such a cold calculated look at what PO means, it is like reading your own medical records and finding out that your Doctor has found terminal cancer and it has spread to every organ in your body.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river
Top

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby grabby » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 14:48:09

Wow, for a while there I thought we have a problem!

Maybe I better get my SUV back, since gas will come back down later!

(Just kidding)

Meanwhile, while the ADMITTEDLY LOST CONTROL OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND, I ask
Who should get fired for that?
___________________________
WHEN THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND...GET OUT OF THE WAY!
Using evil to further good makes one evil
Doubt everything but the TRUTH
This posted information is not permissible to be used
by anyone who has ever met a lawyer
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby grabby » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 14:49:44

oh of course, silly me, all the poor people and middle class, thas right.
___________________________
WHEN THE BLIND LEAD THE BLIND...GET OUT OF THE WAY!
Using evil to further good makes one evil
Doubt everything but the TRUTH
This posted information is not permissible to be used
by anyone who has ever met a lawyer
User avatar
grabby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue 08 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby LadyRuby » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 14:50:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Barbara', 'T')his is serious. They're trying to buy time... a lot of time!
Didn't say "two or three weeks" as they used to do in the past. Three years is a lot.


Three years is also after the next presidential election (which Bush can't run in, thank God, but it's open to any other hand-picked psycho).
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US
Top

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby Eli » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 15:09:08

Saying that we are going to be exposed to three years of supply not meeting demand is a huge red flag. People in his position choose their words very carefully.

That does not mean that we are just going to have high gas prices but that the price will continue to go up over the next three years.

And how many times will terrorists try and hit SA oil production over the next three years and how many hurricanes and Cyclones will blow through the oil producing regions of the world, how far will production drop in Mexico, the North Sea and Venezuela? Not to mention Iran.

Damn we are screwed eight ways to Sunday.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby firestarter » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 15:17:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Eli', 'S')aying that we are going to be exposed to three years of supply not meeting demand is a huge red flag. People in his position choose their words very carefully.

That does not mean that we are just going to have high gas prices but that the price will continue to go up over the next three years.

And how many times will terrorists try and hit SA oil production over the next three years and how many hurricanes and Cyclones will blow through the oil producing regions of the world, how far will production drop in Mexico, the North Sea and Venezuela? Not to mention Iran.

Damn we are screwed eight ways to Sunday.




You're soon going to have a lot of company near your van down by the river.

Bodman, a peak oiler?
User avatar
firestarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1171
Joined: Sun 19 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby gego » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 15:49:11

For those of you who think that capture of energy from the sun via current plant growth into bio diesel or ethanol, consider this:

Oil when it took 1 barrel to discover and produce 10 barrels, yielded a 900% gain. Oil if it takes 1 barrel to discover and produce 3 barrels the gain is 200%. Even if bio diesel or ethanol produces more than it consumes (fat chance), and lets be generous, maybe we get back 110 barrels for every 100 barrels used in production, then our gain is only 10%.

Think about this, oil giving us 900, or declining to 300, when the plant growth oil production only gives us 10. Maybe if you think 900 delivery trucks on the road, vs. 300 delivery trucks on the road vs. 10 delivery trucks on the road. Maybe the local grocery will be out of business, don't you think and the majority will be up no food creek.

The next time someone posts a thread on this site that says biodiesel or ethanol is the savior om this huge excess human population, maybe he or she should be hung upsidedown from an abandoned oil derick.

Three more years is bull shit; more likely it will be eternity.
gego
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1265
Joined: Thu 03 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Energy secretary says 3 more years

Unread postby SoothSayer » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 16:03:01

The next time someone posts a thread on this site that says biodiesel ...

I know who you mean ... my heart sinks whenever I see that name appear on a thread...
User avatar
SoothSayer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1167
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: England

Next

Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest