by Concerned » Wed 05 Apr 2006, 17:09:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OneLoneClone', 'W')here to start? I'm not here to discuss the merits of anarchy vs democratic government with overzealous, unhinged simpletons who see the world in black and white... start your own thread.
I think that longer office terms combined with meaningful campaign finance reform (heineken, you are right, you would need both) would really help america deal with long term problems. I think that the election cycle is part of the problem. Election years are fucked, and increasingly TWO years before any given election are fucked, because the campaigning keeps beginining earlier. Election years tend to yield pandering 'solutions' to problems that end up creating more problems.
Considering that people like the Bushes, Clintons, Rumsfelds et el are career politicians and senators remaining incumbent for years if not decades.
These people are active daily and supposedly looking after our interests year in year out.
Just because you get a different talking head every four years (sometimes extended to eight) I don't see how increasing the duration will help matters.
In any event many agreements entered into flow on to subsequent "new" (rolls eyes) administrations.
For example defence contracts for weapons systems, war in Iraq and say agreements such as NAFTA.
Our problems I believe stem from an ideology that believes in infinite growth on a finite planet and that greed (which I acknowledge is a fantastic motivator) will provide the best human characteristic for raising the standards of living for all people.