Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Long term problems + short term limits = cluster%#*?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Longer office terms...

would help us deal with long term crises, worth the risk
3
No votes
would help us, but too risky
5
No votes
wouldn't help anyway
23
No votes
 
Total votes : 31

Re: Long term problems + short term limits = clusterfuck?

Unread postby Concerned » Wed 05 Apr 2006, 17:09:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('OneLoneClone', 'W')here to start? I'm not here to discuss the merits of anarchy vs democratic government with overzealous, unhinged simpletons who see the world in black and white... start your own thread.

I think that longer office terms combined with meaningful campaign finance reform (heineken, you are right, you would need both) would really help america deal with long term problems. I think that the election cycle is part of the problem. Election years are fucked, and increasingly TWO years before any given election are fucked, because the campaigning keeps beginining earlier. Election years tend to yield pandering 'solutions' to problems that end up creating more problems.


Considering that people like the Bushes, Clintons, Rumsfelds et el are career politicians and senators remaining incumbent for years if not decades.

These people are active daily and supposedly looking after our interests year in year out.

Just because you get a different talking head every four years (sometimes extended to eight) I don't see how increasing the duration will help matters.

In any event many agreements entered into flow on to subsequent "new" (rolls eyes) administrations.


For example defence contracts for weapons systems, war in Iraq and say agreements such as NAFTA.

Our problems I believe stem from an ideology that believes in infinite growth on a finite planet and that greed (which I acknowledge is a fantastic motivator) will provide the best human characteristic for raising the standards of living for all people.
"Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
-Italian Proverb
User avatar
Concerned
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Long term problems + short term limits = clusterfuck?

Unread postby Concerned » Wed 05 Apr 2006, 17:26:55

I just wanted to add that if people want longer terms. Why not keep voting say Republican or Democrat?

Assuming for example that the Democrats and Republicans are poles apart on issues such as "Free Trade" and Defence, or perhaps I should focus on important issues such as abortion and gay marriage?

It's not as if Regan, Bush Sr, Dole, Bush Jr etc.. will be that far apart on policy it's the exact same party.
"Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
-Italian Proverb
User avatar
Concerned
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Long term problems + short term limits = clusterfuck?

Unread postby rogerhb » Wed 05 Apr 2006, 20:21:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Grifter', 'I')sn't party politics the problem?


Alas party politics relieves representatives of the hard work of having to understand the impact of what they are voting for.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Long term problems + short term limits = cluster%#*?

Unread postby MyOtherID » Wed 05 Apr 2006, 20:59:13

The US, as long as it retains the lobbying systems with corporations in bed with pollies, will always be a dangerous and unpleasant place to live, as it is now.

However, Bush recently made a truly amazing statement that shows he is serious about reforming the influence big business has on government in the land that has The Best Government that Money can Buy. Listen to this breakthrough statement:

http://www.weeklyradioaddress.com/Sounds/WRA_060401.mp3
User avatar
MyOtherID
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 343
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Vegas, America's cloaca

Re: Long term problems + short term limits = cluster%#*?

Unread postby eric_b » Wed 05 Apr 2006, 21:05:03

I love that word. ClusterFUCK. Say it out loud a few times.

It's a good way to summarise the human condition at this point.
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us

Re: Long term problems + short term limits = cluster%#*?

Unread postby zed » Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:41:39

I'm not convinced democracy/representative government will work very well in an age of collapse and contraction. In such an environment, lies and deception are much more palatable to many people than the truth of needing to consume less, spend less, have less kids, etc.

I'm guessing it is very rare (if it has even happened) for a society to maintain a representative government during a prolonged multi-generational collapse. Thus I don't think the terms of representatives really addresses the fundamental issue here...
User avatar
zed
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Long term problems + short term limits = cluster%#*?

Unread postby OneLoneClone » Thu 06 Apr 2006, 16:09:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m guessing it is very rare (if it has even happened) for a society to maintain a representative government during a prolonged multi-generational collapse. Thus I don't think the terms of representatives really addresses the fundamental issue here...


I think you are probably right, and that really freaks my sh*t out.

Especially with all these dimwit cafe revolutionaries around here fantasizing about who they would like to guillotine.
OneLoneClone
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Fri 07 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron