by Leanan » Tue 31 Jan 2006, 18:41:10
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou know I really find this hard to believe. If this was the case, wouldn't people in the Sudan and Somalia be eating their own children during their prolonged famines?
I'm not sure. They are perhaps not as desperate, since they know if they can get to a UN feeding station, there will be food.
OTOH, if they were doing it, would we know about it? It's awfully isolated. Amnesty International got photographic proof that widescale cannibalism was going on in Liberia and Sierra Leone in the '80s, but declined to publicize it. This was confirmed in a couple of later video documentaries, but how many people have heard of it? It's not the kind of information that's likely to get donors to open up their wallets.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')on't you think that anthropologists are engaged in hyterical cannibal outing these days, to counteract years of cannibalism denial in their field of research?
I honestly don't know. The show was more history than anthropology, though it used some recent anthrology findings, like the study that claims our genes show we evolved to be cannibals.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')n the other hand, maybe fathers who've only had limited contact with their children would eat them. But mothers? Nope. Wouldn't happen.
I'm not sure, one way or the other. Supposedly, the Soviet government actually printed signs reading "Eating your children is an act of barbarism." Does that mean people were actually doing it? I dunno.
Mothers of the Fore tribe did eat the bodies of their children, and even well-fed American mothers sometimes eat the placentas of their babies. If they were hungry enough, would they eat the babies, too?
We know that in some circumstances, mothers will kill their own children, and in some circumstances, they will eat their children's bodies, so doing both seems possible.
Supposedly, parents in China who couldn't bear to eat their own children traded with other parents.