Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

New Scientist: Green diet better than green car

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: New Scientist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby seldom_seen » Thu 12 Jan 2006, 13:30:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'W')hich documents the unsuccessful attempt to find evidence of cancer or auto-immune disorders in hunter-gatherer societies.


He must have been really not looking, because there are signs of arthritis (one of the most common auto-inmune disorders) in plenty of fossils. Have a look at:

http://www.arthritis.org/resources/arth ... meLine.asp

Cancer and auto-inmune disorders have been with us a long, long time...

I looked at that link. Just about every example is of osteoarthritis, which afaik is not auto-immune in origin.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: New Scitentist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby coyote » Thu 12 Jan 2006, 15:36:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seldom_seen', 'h')aha, the "entire nutritional community." As if there's some unified "nutritional community" out there that has a lock on the truth.

No one has a lock on the truth. But yes, most of those guys do seem pretty unified on this particular issue, from what I can tell.

I seem to be in the minority here in this thread. But I, for one, will continue to believe the vast majority of nutritional scientists when they tell me I should have some helpings of broccoli and carrots if I want to stay healthy. Peace.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden

Re: New Scitentist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby The_Virginian » Thu 12 Jan 2006, 16:26:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shannymara', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Virginian', 'N')ow all we need is a Moderator to take your post and Stickey it in the "Preperations" section as "Raising Locust/Hoppers for Urban Protien"

You could add it to this thread about eating insects, but I have to warn you that reviving it might irritate Pops...


So it shall be written, so it shall be done. :)
[urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watchv=Ai4te4daLZs&feature=related[/url] "My soul longs for the candle and the spices. If only you would pour me a cup of wine for Havdalah...My heart yearning, I shall lift up my eyes to g-d, who provides for my needs day and night."
User avatar
The_Virginian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: New Scitentist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Thu 12 Jan 2006, 17:55:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', 'A')re you honestly trying to take on the entire nutritional community


To suggest that the entire nutritional community had come to any sort of consensus about Adkins is simply incorrect. Adkins has certainly had it's detractors over the years. Most of them are chronicled on the link you provided. Most of the stuff that has been published about Adkins in the last couple of years has cautiously optimistic.

Pemican does in fact provide all the basic nutrients neccesary to sustain human life. The benefits and risks of increasing this or that nutrient can and have been debated ad nauseum. Meat provides all the basic nutrients necessary to support life except Vitamin C which added to the pemican in the form of dried berries.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: New Scientist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby TheTurtle » Thu 12 Jan 2006, 19:40:17

The anti-Atkins rhetoric is a classic example of erroneous group think.

My wife and I started Atkins almost 4 years ago and haven't eaten grains or sugar since. During that time we have each lost more than 70 pounds (and kept it off), her cholesterol dropped more than 100 points (with her good cholesterol getting higher and her bad cholesterol lower). My cholesterol was never bad, but it has remained good "despite" (I know it is actually due to) eating bacon and eggs for breakfast daily for almost 4 years. My blood pressure dropped 40 points, top and bottom.

I have recently drifted from Atkins more toward a Paleolithic diet (i.e., what we are genetically designed to eat), which basically just involves giving up cheese and adding more fruit.

I eat eggs, meat, nuts, vegetables and fruits. I will never again eat grains or sugar. But I encourage everyone else to eat as much grains and sugar as they wish ... it leaves more good food for me. :P
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi

Re: New Scitentist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby tawharanui » Sat 14 Jan 2006, 07:05:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', 'I')nteresting article, and it makes perfect sense... it takes a lot of pounds of grain to produce one pound of beef. We're all talking about EROEI around here -- well, how about the EROEI of beef versus veggies and grains? If veggies and grains are the light sweet crude in that scale, then beef would be the tar sands...


Thanks coyote, for your intelligent comments and words of welcome.

It is a pity that this thread, which I started to look at the best way of reducing our energy footprint on the planet--by changing mode of transport or changing dietary patterns--has descended into a mud slinging fest on the various merits of meat versus grain diets, with lots of personal testimonials thrown in.

I thought this was an energy-focused forum!? The article alluded to the energy inputs required to feed people under two scenarios and transport people under two scenarios.

The comments around this theme are few, so I am tempted to conclude that most people here are just too lazy or uninterested to delve outside their own prejudices and preconceptions of the world.

anyone want to talk about the topic at hand?
didn't think so.
ciao.
User avatar
tawharanui
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue 10 Jan 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: New Scitentist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby TheTurtle » Sat 14 Jan 2006, 09:43:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('tawharanui', '
')
The comments around this theme are few, so I am tempted to conclude that most people here are just too lazy or uninterested to delve outside their own prejudices and preconceptions of the world.

anyone want to talk about the topic at hand?
didn't think so.
ciao.


Please consider the possibility that the only reason you posted the original article was to seek justification for your own "prejudices and preconceptions of the world", rather than to seek the truth.

Consider this from your second post:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('tinosorb', '
')
How vile sounding. I kind of feel sorry for the people who didn't inherit the "animal meat and fat is repulsive" gene. The world would be a much cleaner and better place. I don't understand why so many accept that cars can be polluting but refuse to acknowledge the impacts of their diets.


That has a certain "mud slinging" quality to it, don't you think. :roll:

I'm willing to accept that the meat industry uses some pretty inefficient and repulsive methods and technology. But I am equally aware that the cornfields north of me were once grazing grounds for bison and that the pesticides - used to keep insects from that corn as it grows - not only kill millions of insects, but also the birds and mice that feed on those insects (not to mention seeping into the groundwater and rivers and streams hereabouts where it poisons riverlife and the humans who get their water from the rivers). I won't even go into how many little mammals are slaughtered beneath the tractor tires or the blades of combines. Nor will I go into how much oil is required to run those machines to grow your grains.

The fact is, ALL commercial agro-business is nasty and energy wasteful, both for those of us who eat meat and for those who don't.

If you want to read an excellent analysis of how hunting is less damaging to our planet than "super market fossil-fuel vegetarianism", I recommend that you read Ted Kerasote's Bloodties: Nature, Culture, and the Hunt.

To learn that there is no such thing as your "animal meat and fat is repulsive" gene, but rather that we are genetically predisposed to be meat and fat eating omnivores, rather than grass eating ungulates, I suggest you read Paul Shepard's Coming Home to the Pleistocene.

Assuming, of course, that you are actually interested in this topic and not "lazy and uninterested'. :P
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Re: New Scitentist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby coyote » Wed 25 Jan 2006, 17:46:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', 'T')he fact is, ALL commercial agro-business is nasty and energy wasteful, both for those of us who eat meat and for those who don't.

Turtle, assume for the moment that it's twenty years after the Peak and agro-business is no more. No more horrible practices for meat or for veggies and grains. Now: what is the EROEI of each of those for human beings? It turns out that it's vastly higher for vegetables and grains. The reason is simple: each stage of the food chain is inefficient, so that it might take 10 or 20 pounds of edible vegetation to produce one single pound of meat. Analogous to losing energy when converting coal to electricity. You might say that as the electricity is higher quality energy, so the meat is higher quality food; and I wouldn't be able to argue. But when we're talking about supporting seven billion people on the planet, well, I think it's clear that the vegetation will do a better job.

Incidentally, for the Atkins worshippers:

In Major Diet Study, Carbohydrates Found Not Guilty

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]MedPage Today Action Points

Inform interested patients that in this study a diet low in fats and rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains is not associated with weight gain over a period of several years, at least among postmenopausal women.

Explain that this finding comes from a large-scale health intervention trial and runs counter to the idea that carbohydrates are responsible for obesity, as promoted by popular diet books and plans.

Also explain that altering dietary composition without caloric restriction will not result in weight loss. The only effective way to modify obesity is with adherence to a calorically restricted diet.

... The findings may finally put to rest the notion - propagated by popular diets such as the Atkins, Sugarbusters, and Zone plans - that carbohydrates are the root of all dietary evil. They were reported in the Jan. 4 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association by Barbara V. Howard, Ph.D., of the MedStar Research Institute here and other centers.

"This study shows that increasing carbohydrates doesn't necessarily lead to an increase in weight, so it goes counter to some of the recent enthusiasm for cutting down on carbs and increasing fat," said co-investigator Jacques Rossouw, M.D., a project officer of the Women's Health Initiative at the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, in an interview.


Eat your veggies. 8)
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden
Top

Re: New Scitentist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby TheTurtle » Wed 25 Jan 2006, 19:36:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', 'B')ut when we're talking about supporting seven billion people on the planet, well, I think it's clear that the vegetation will do a better job.


And "single celled proteins combined with synthetic aminos, vitamins and minerals" contain "everything the body needs". Doesn't make it natural for us to eat, though. :P

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', 'I')ncidentally, for the Atkins worshippers: ...Eat your veggies.


Where do people get the idea that veggies aren't part of the Atkin's diet? I eat a salad every day for lunch.
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Re: New Scitentist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby coyote » Wed 25 Jan 2006, 19:49:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheTurtle', 'W')here do people get the idea that veggies aren't part of the Atkin's diet? I eat a salad every day for lunch.

Well, maybe the diet's changed. I bought 'The Atkins Diet Revolution' about five years ago and tried it for about a week and a half. The book told me to cut out all carbs, including vegetables, and to keep myself alive on supplements and laxatives. Doesn't strike me as all that healthy a diet if you need that stuff just to keep things functioning. But again, maybe things have changed.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Mr. Over the Top Carb Counter

Bud Light Presents Real Men of Genius
(Real Men of Genius)

Today we salute you Mr. Over the Top Carb Counter
(Mr. Over the Top Carb Counter)
Brushing aside such follies as work and family,
You wisely adopted carbo counting as your primary past time.
(I'm CRAZY for carbos)
From breakfast through dinner you tirelessly record every precious carb
Hoping it may all add up to your target number... ZERO
(Hold on to your dream now)
Was that artichoke you ate 13.5 carbs or 13.6? Better look it all up while you help yourself to another package of bacon.
(I like it crispy)
So crack open an ice cold Bud Light O Count of Monte Carbo
Because the only thing better than meat and potatoes, is meat and meat
(Mr. Over the Top Carb Counter)
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden
Top

Re: New Scitentist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby TheTurtle » Thu 26 Jan 2006, 20:23:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', '
')Well, maybe the diet's changed. I bought 'The Atkins Diet Revolution' about five years ago and tried it for about a week and a half. The book told me to cut out all carbs, including vegetables, and to keep myself alive on supplements and laxatives.


Don't know about the laxatives, but the first couple of weeks of the Atkins diet (the induction period) is necessary to reset your metabolism. During the induction period, most carbs (though not all vegetables) are eliminated . After those two weeks (admittedly hard for people addicted to simple carbs), more and more vegetables are re-introduced into ones diet. Eventually, Atkins even adds fruit and whole grains.
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Re: New Scientist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby nocar » Fri 27 Jan 2006, 10:01:27

Well, let us get back to the point of this thread - eating meat or driving cars.

Whether a vegetarian or a mixed or an exclusive meat diet makes you live longer is beside the point here. People seem to be able to live to a ripe old age on lots of different diets. And some die young on all kinds of diets also. (Actually, a diet that kills you sooner would be better in the spirit of this forum. Overpopulation is not helped by people living longer!)

But certainly a vegetarian diet requires less of the earth's resources, as each acre can feed more people that way. Yet most people want fish and meat along with their grain and veggies. And most people seem to want a car too, which also is very wasteful of Earth's resources.

For my own part, I do not mind giving up a car, but I would really mind giving up meat and fish - although of course I can enjoy an occasional veggie dinner. But then I do not like cars very much.

So a question to this thread's posters: What would you rather give up? Your car or your beef, eggs and bacon?

nocar
nocar
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri 05 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: New Scientist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby dub_scratch » Fri 27 Jan 2006, 12:57:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nocar', '
')
So a question to this thread's posters: What would you rather give up? Your car or your beef, eggs and bacon?

nocar



...Too easy.
It's the car that goes.

Actually we should restate & clarify that question. Would you rather give up driving (reduce to half the average milage) or would you give up eating meat altogether? That actually becomes a much better bargain, and from my estimation it is a much bigger energy reduction. We don't have to give up the car altogeter to make a big difference but we would have to all go on a strict vegan diet in order to notice. So in terms of that, I have already made that deal where I drive only 500 miles a year and still eat meat.

On a related topic, it is interesting to see these ethanol proposals that are obliquely presenting the same hamburger vs car question. That is because in order to expand ethanol production to its greatest level possible, we would have to all go vegetarian as we divert corn from cows to cars. yet we never hear these ethanol promoting frauds ever say they need everybody to give up meat eating so we can save the National Traffic Jam. And the reason the omit that is quite obvious. Everybody would rather have hamburgers then traffic jams.


let's see, humans have been eating meat for how long?...and driving cars for how long?
dub_scratch
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Thu 16 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Top

Re: New Scientist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby coyote » Fri 27 Jan 2006, 16:22:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dub_scratch', 'O')n a related topic, it is interesting to see these ethanol proposals that are obliquely presenting the same hamburger vs car question. That is because in order to expand ethanol production to its greatest level possible, we would have to all go vegetarian as we divert corn from cows to cars. yet we never hear these ethanol promoting frauds ever say they need everybody to give up meat eating so we can save the National Traffic Jam. And the reason the omit that is quite obvious. Everybody would rather have hamburgers then traffic jams.


let's see, humans have been eating meat for how long?...and driving cars for how long?

Good point, but I think the important part is that hydrocarbons have enabled a many-fold increase in the earth's population in a very short amount of time -- so the question now is, how do we keep people from starving after the Peak? Purely in terms of energy, vegetarianism looks like the best way to do that.

About the ethanol: I'm in the process of fighting my way through The Mother of all Biofuels Debates, but I am very interested in the ethanol from switchgrass topic. Looks very promising in many ways.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden
Top

Re: New Scientist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby TheTurtle » Fri 27 Jan 2006, 19:54:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('nocar', '
')So a question to this thread's posters: What would you rather give up? Your car or your beef, eggs and bacon?


Car, hands down.

I envision the day ... soon very soon ... when I will no longer own a car.
But I will eat meat until the very end. :)
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi
Top

Re: New Scientist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby dub_scratch » Fri 27 Jan 2006, 22:12:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dub_scratch', 'O')n a related topic, it is interesting to see these ethanol proposals that are obliquely presenting the same hamburger vs car question. That is because in order to expand ethanol production to its greatest level possible, we would have to all go vegetarian as we divert corn from cows to cars. yet we never hear these ethanol promoting frauds ever say they need everybody to give up meat eating so we can save the National Traffic Jam. And the reason the omit that is quite obvious. Everybody would rather have hamburgers then traffic jams.


let's see, humans have been eating meat for how long?...and driving cars for how long?



About the ethanol: I'm in the process of fighting my way through The Mother of all Biofuels Debates, but I am very interested in the ethanol from switchgrass topic. Looks very promising in many ways.


OK, switchgrass ethanol may work-- fine. But can it possibly be enough to power a substantial fraction of our transportation in the US (a.k.a. the National Traffic Jam)? Hell no it cannot. Therefore, if ethanol is going to do that then it is going to have to take up a large portion of our agricultural capacity, perhaps all of it. So if switchgrass does work it still does not give us the possibility of ethanol without forcing the hamburger vs. traffic jam choice.
dub_scratch
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Thu 16 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Top

Re: New Scientist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby coyote » Fri 27 Jan 2006, 23:03:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dub_scratch', 'S')o if switchgrass does work it still does not give us the possibility of ethanol without forcing the hamburger vs. traffic jam choice.

Agreed. The traffic jam is toast either way.

Oh, hey.... :lol:
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden
Top

Re: New Scientist: Green diet better than green car

Unread postby dub_scratch » Fri 27 Jan 2006, 23:18:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('coyote', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dub_scratch', 'S')o if switchgrass does work it still does not give us the possibility of ethanol without forcing the hamburger vs. traffic jam choice.

Agreed. The traffic jam is toast either way.

Oh, hey.... :lol:



Yea and that cow goes right in the meat grinder too....yum... :)
dub_scratch
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 700
Joined: Thu 16 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron