Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Ford Motor Company Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby JeeBoomba » Fri 20 Jan 2006, 17:58:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'M')y first car was a Ford Taurus.

I think an O2 sensor is out, which renders the car uninspectable come May. :x

For what it's worth, you can almost certainly replace the O2 sensor yourself. Go down to AutoZone (or whatever you have locally) and buy the sensor and an oxygen sensor socket. Total should be well under $100. Depending on where on the exhaust the sensor is located, it should be pretty easy.
User avatar
JeeBoomba
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby AmericanEmpire » Fri 20 Jan 2006, 21:39:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'ll either drive this one into the ground, or live in it when there's no more gas available.


Yep, thats what I plan on with the car my wife and I share now. Mine got wrecked a year ago but in retrospect thats ok cause I don't need two to put gas in. We use the public transit and share a car, now.
AmericanEmpire
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu 14 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Fri 20 Jan 2006, 23:51:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JeeBoomba', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'M')y first car was a Ford Taurus.

I think an O2 sensor is out, which renders the car uninspectable come May. :x

For what it's worth, you can almost certainly replace the O2 sensor yourself. Go down to AutoZone (or whatever you have locally) and buy the sensor and an oxygen sensor socket. Total should be well under $100. Depending on where on the exhaust the sensor is located, it should be pretty easy.


Thanks for the advice, JeeB. I'm pretty sure that the intermittent display of driving warning lights that I mentioned originally will also render the car uninspectable as well, and that's the costly fix (~$500 at least).
I'm not sure I'd be able to pull that one off.

It doesn't take much to convince me that a new 45+ MPG Jetta makes more sense, even with PO coming, than my 19 MPG Taurus. :)
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby pup55 » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 03:49:20

I've owned 8 fords in my life, got two of them now.

They should do what they do best (F150's and mustangs) and leave the boring rental-car fleet vehicles to somebody else.

Evidently they also do a good job on cop cars (a.k.a. redneck limousines) because plenty of them around. When is the last time you saw a cop try to pull someone over in a honda? That'll be the day.
User avatar
pup55
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5249
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby larrydallas » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 06:06:24

I think Ford is really hurting from the big vehicle sales or lack thereof I should say. Their econoline and F-series are very profitable vehilces. The F250/350 sold like crazy because of the tax loop hole for vehciles over 6000 pounds being major tax deductions for business. That worked until we hit $2-3 gas/diesel. Now, these vehicles are costing more than the tax deduction savings in a year's worth of fuel if you are a commercial entity.

The private car buyer is also staying away from buying an F150 just for the heck of it when he does not have to have one to live for the obvious fuel cost reason.

Now with cars, they do have success with the Crown Vic and Mustang but is this sustainable? Crown Vic is almost all fleet sales to corporations or govt. The chasis does double duty in Mercury/Lincoln format but it's not a stellar seller. Mustang simply sells because if the heritage and name plate. The fact that they had to retro the car's looks to such an extreme they copied what Lee Iacocco conjured up in 1963 for a 64 model is a bad sign. Other companies have done it with cars like the VW bug but that was not at a time when the company was neary broke.

Ford needs to shut down Mercury, end all minivan production, and gut Lincoln's lineup to keep only the towncar and a few sedans like the 06 Zypher. The Lincoln SUVs and trucks will be completely in the red as soon as gas surges over $3.50 a gallon if they are not already.

For their cars that will come out in the next 3-5 years (if they are still around) they need to develop turbo diesels in 4 or 5 cyl configuartions. Those engines do wonders for mileage. Way back in the early 80s Mercedes offered a 5 cyl diesel on their S class sedans in the US and compared to the same car powered by a gas engine it was a big difference. The W126 chasis sedans weighed over 4500 pounds and got about 12-14 mpg on gasoline but closer to 20-22 on turbo diesels.

Of course, I'm sure Ford will not do this. They will just keep adding airbags and sensors to their cars to pitch the safety thing. I'm disgsuted when I see Bill Ford in that commercial with the mom and her kids as he talks about safety and innovation. Bill, all of those dirty F series trucks and SUVs you build are going to pollute the air so much those kids will have calcified soot on their lungs before they hit 30 if they live anywhere near a major city.
User avatar
larrydallas
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 175
Joined: Wed 18 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby Eli » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 11:21:28

Both Ford and GM are done. Ford just announced 25,000 worth of layoffs in the US and massive restructuring and they say that this is only the beginning.

Like it was said before GM and Ford made their money on their large vehicle line up, GM just came out with an all new large vehicle redesign that they hoped would save them.

With the high fuel costs coming and the fact that neither company has been able to come up with a decent small car to compete with the Japanese they are screwed. Neither one knows how to make money selling small cars.

Already, having serious financial problems poor small car designs top heavy production in large vehicles that have slowing sales and 3.00 gas expected to make an extended appearance is not good time to try and turn around an auto company.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby jesus_of_suburbia_old » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 16:30:31

Was I the only one who thought this thread was going to be about Gerald Ford?

I am currently driving a 98 Taurus. I hate this fucking car. I mean, for a first car it isn't terrible. But ultimately, it's a Taurus. You might as well be driving a Chevy Cavalier. It has all of these weird glitches. Nothing major, yet.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t doesn't take much to convince me that a new 45+ MPG Jetta makes more sense, even with PO coming, than my 19 MPG Taurus.

Hopefully, I'll be bringing in more money in the next few months. As soon as I pay off my parents, I'd like to buy a Jetta.
jesus_of_suburbia_old
 
Top

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 16:58:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')opefully, I'll be bringing in more money in the next few months. As soon as I pay off my parents, I'd like to buy a Jetta.


Why buy a car when you can learn to build your own, which would have far better performance and efficiency for a lower cost?

Say, a Datsun 1200 sedan with a 2.8L Nissan diesel engine in it, turbocharged. You'd get over 70 mpg and see a 150 mph top speed and 0-60 mph < 5 seconds. It would be capable of seating five adults. Such a car would cost you about $8,000 to build if you do your own work... A 20 gallon tank of vegetable oil would take it halfway across the U.S., and post peak, so long as you have land, you could make small amounts of fuel for it.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Sat 21 Jan 2006, 23:07:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jesus_of_suburbia', 'H')opefully, I'll be bringing in more money in the next few months. As soon as I pay off my parents, I'd like to buy a Jetta.


Right on cue, 2006 Jetta TDi sitting in my driveway tonight. Image
Now, where's my tax credit? :o
j/k - I've heard a diesel credit is in the works for 2007, tho...
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Sun 22 Jan 2006, 02:25:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')opefully, I'll be bringing in more money in the next few months. As soon as I pay off my parents, I'd like to buy a Jetta.


Why buy a car when you can learn to build your own, which would have far better performance and efficiency for a lower cost?

Say, a Datsun 1200 sedan with a 2.8L Nissan diesel engine in it, turbocharged. You'd get over 70 mpg and see a 150 mph top speed and 0-60 mph < 5 seconds. It would be capable of seating five adults. Such a car would cost you about $8,000 to build if you do your own work... A 20 gallon tank of vegetable oil would take it halfway across the U.S., and post peak, so long as you have land, you could make small amounts of fuel for it.
Datsun 1200 sedans - they ran till they rusted.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby smiley » Sun 22 Jan 2006, 17:03:19

Will they ever learn?

Image

Hmmm..... large vehicle sales are slipping. Probably they are not big enough. Let's make them bigger.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby elroy » Sun 22 Jan 2006, 22:17:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Eli', 'B')oth Ford and GM are done. Ford just announced 25,000 worth of layoffs in the US and massive restructuring and they say that this is only the beginning.
Got a source ? Cause that other article says the news would be published on monday, which it isn't yet, in the US anyway.
Image
User avatar
elroy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Netherlands
Top

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Mon 23 Jan 2006, 03:21:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jesus_of_suburbia', '
')I am currently driving a 98 Taurus. I hate this fucking car. I mean, for a first car it isn't terrible. But ultimately, it's a Taurus. You might as well be driving a Chevy Cavalier. It has all of these weird glitches. Nothing major, yet.
My neighbor bought a new Taurus wagon a few years ago. His wife was grumpy since she was still driving an '85 Toyota Tercel. The Taurus rusted severely and developed major mechanical problems. He trashed it and got a Chrysler Decrepit. She is still driving the Tercel.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Mon 23 Jan 2006, 03:42:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smiley', 'W')ill they ever learn?

Image

Hmmm..... large vehicle sales are slipping. Probably they are not big enough. Let's make them bigger.


Image
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Ford drives past forecasts

Unread postby Specop_007 » Mon 23 Jan 2006, 09:42:07

Good job Ford!
Article

Troubled No. 2 automaker overcomes losses in auto operations to post much better-than-expected profit.
January 23, 2006: 8:06 AM EST


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) - Ford Motor Co., hours ahead of an expected announcement about thousands of job cuts and widespread plant closings, posted much better-than-expected fourth quarter earnings Monday.

The nation's No. 2 automaker said it overcame losses at its core North American auto operations to earn $511 million, or 26 cents a share, excluding special items in the quarter. Analysts surveyed by earnings tracker First Call had forecast only a 1-cent a share profit in the period.

The company earned $554 million, or 28 cents per share, on that basis a year earlier.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Ford drives past forecasts

Unread postby crow » Mon 23 Jan 2006, 11:03:14

Looks like the old goat is going to stick around a while longer!
:roll:

I wish Henry Ford Senior was back, just to see what has become of his company! the look on his face would be precious.
User avatar
crow
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu 20 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Ford's fight for survival

Unread postby leal » Mon 23 Jan 2006, 15:56:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('elroy', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Eli', 'B')oth Ford and GM are done. Ford just announced 25,000 worth of layoffs in the US and massive restructuring and they say that this is only the beginning.
Got a source ? Cause that other article says the news would be published on monday, which it isn't yet, in the US anyway.

Now it is published:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')ord is taking the following new actions to align its capacity with expected demand and to reduce fixed costs:

* 14 manufacturing facilities will be idled and cease production by 2012, including a total of seven vehicle assembly plants.

* Assembly capacity will be reduced by 1.2 million units or 26 percent by the end of 2008.

* A new low-cost manufacturing site is planned for the future.

* Ford will idle the following facilities through 2008:

- St. Louis Assembly

- Atlanta Assembly

- Wixom Assembly

- Batavia Transmission

- Windsor Casting (announced following CAW contract negotiations in 2005)

- Two additional assembly plants, which will be determined later this year

In addition, production at St. Thomas Assembly will be reduced to one shift. Facilities operated by Automotive Components Holding LLC are not included in the new announcement.

All of these actions will reduce total North American employment by 25,000-30,000 people in the 2006-2012 time period. This is in addition to the previously announced reduction of the equivalent of 4,000 salaried positions in the first quarter of 2006 -- or 10 percent of salary-related costs -- and a reduction in the company's officer ranks by 12 percent by the end of the first quarter.
User avatar
leal
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Sweden
Top

2006 Ford Fusion - 'creates' its own energy?

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Mon 20 Feb 2006, 19:32:19

What a desperate ploy at advertising, just false enough to encourage the more litigious among us to sue Ford for just such a marketing move. Clearly, the car has an ICE - it follows that it must 'use' energy, correct? I'm afraid more than a few Joe Sixpacks will waltz into a Ford dealer and purchase one of these, only to find out too late that the car in question hardly 'creates' anything, save for a good amount of air pollution and perhaps a few inflated egos.

Anyways, this is the *dumbest* *thread* *ever*

That commercial just irks me, though. Seriously.
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: 2006 Ford Fusion - 'creates' its own energy?

Unread postby J-Rod » Mon 20 Feb 2006, 19:42:52

I was going to post something similar when I first saw it, but of course it's just advertising. They do *say* that it creates energy, but the implication is another type of energy, not the one that fuels the kinetic motion of the car. But yes, basically annoying, it did give me a good laugh.
User avatar
J-Rod
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Northeast Ohio

Re: 2006 Ford Fusion - 'creates' its own energy?

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Mon 20 Feb 2006, 19:52:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('J-Rod', 'I') was going to post something similar when I first saw it, but of course it's just advertising. They do *say* that it creates energy, but the implication is another type of energy, not the one that fuels the kinetic motion of the car. But yes, basically annoying, it did give me a good laugh.


But take Joe Sixpack for a moment - is he sophisticated enough to understand the nuanced, tongue-in-cheek phrases of Ford's marketing department? After all, aren't these are the same people who apparently need graphics on plastic grocery bags indicating that they are not to be used as playthings for children? Using only this (and perhaps "caution: coffee is very HOT), we can extrapolate that the average American joe is not smart enough to understand Ford's line of BS for what it is, and will, in fact, demand that the car not require any sort of energy input. Correct? Well, I'm waiting on the class-action boat to arrive. :razz:

:roll:
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests