by entropyfails » Sun 18 Dec 2005, 07:33:13
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'F')unny how headlines only mention the core rate when 'volatile energy prices' go up, but those same costs are included when they go down.
Exactly.
I also find it amazing that the headlines don't read
"Amazing drop in prices after introduction of Free Gas"
Pump some stored up energy into our economic system, and BAMB! It works better. Hmm...
All of these energy companies that loaned oil from the US Government simply did so by subtracting the oil loan against their proven oil reserves. It didn't cost anybody anything at all. The happy faces returned to the pumps. We all had an oil party.
But the snake had begun to eat the tail. And as the quality of oil declines, the snake head must INCREASE the length of tail it eats each time we throw these parties.
It isn't really the information that economic rags publish, it's the tone. I mean they could have talking head go up there and say, "Well this free oil giveaway did lower prices, like most free giveaways do, but what we really did is rob from our children's trust fund so we could continue to live our lifestyle." I mean, it's the truth, correct? But they don't do that.
If our leaders had a sense of history, wouldn't we see somber speeches apologizing to the children of the future about how necessary it was to do this? It is almost as if the leaders feel that there will be no history to judge their actions but we probably can ascribe this behavior to an unbelievable amount of shortsightedness and an overly selfish nature.
When the strategic reserves reach 10% of their maximum fill, I think we will find that the American way of life ends up being much more negotiable than the leaders have led us to believe. The question is, what side of the negotiating table will we be on?