Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby Ayoob_Reloaded » Wed 15 Dec 2004, 21:12:08

I did a little more research on the one I have, and it gets about 50MPG. One other advantage a bike has over a car is that in the event TSHTF quickly, I bet the freeways will be clogged. I can split lanes on my way out of Dodge. Or, I could head off the road in ways a car just couldn't go.

OK, that's pretty apocalyptic.
User avatar
Ayoob_Reloaded
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby mindfarkk » Wed 15 Dec 2004, 21:17:05

not to mention you'll be having fun whilst escaping the apocalypse.
User avatar
mindfarkk
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby savethehumans » Thu 16 Dec 2004, 03:18:42

I'm planning to buy a moped (you have to have a special license for motorcycles here). As it only holds a couple of gallons, and I can walk or bus much of the time, I won't be contributing much to global warming, PLUS I can get places the buses don't run, or on days and times they don't run. I think a Honda is my best bet. Any opinions out there?
User avatar
savethehumans
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed 20 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Ayoob_Reloaded » Thu 16 Dec 2004, 04:56:55

The Honda Ruckus gets about 100MPG... I ride a Vespa scooter for work from time to time, and it gets about the same mileage.

My bike is a BMW r80/7 (800cc touring bike) that gets something like 55MPG. I suppose you should do whatever suits you the best.

The Vespa scooter I ride for work tows a trailer, so I suppose it's possible to use a scooter for things like grocery shopping or transportation to/from work and such things.
User avatar
Ayoob_Reloaded
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby skateari » Thu 16 Dec 2004, 05:35:05

it will get you to work quickly... without the lug of a huge car. A motercycle is a great gas-saver when traveling solo and when you dont need to pull any dead weight. keepin it should be a good idea
User avatar
skateari
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby mindfarkk » Thu 16 Dec 2004, 09:55:25

ayoob how did you get your trailer?
User avatar
mindfarkk
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 441
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby PhilBiker » Thu 16 Dec 2004, 10:11:12

Motorcycles are great! I am definitely going to keep mine, I'm putting almost $1000 into it to keep it tip top. New chain/sprockets, all new coolant hoses, fixing rusted gas tank, and more. Mine has big saddlebags and can haul two people and some of their stuff comfortably. It gets about 45mpg. If I lost it somehow I'd replace it with something more economical. I use mine as economical transportation.

I think as gasoline gets more and more expensive people will see motorcycles and mopeds as good economical transportation and the segment will take off for quite some time while the car business slowly withers. Good for companies that make motos but don't make cars, like Harley Davidson, Kawasaki (though some of their other industries like jet engines and aircraft parts will take a hit), Aprillia, Triumph, KTM, Yamaha.

The nice thing about motos is that for a basic moto like a Honda Nighthawk or Kawasaki ZR-7 for example the energy that goes into manufacturing is a fraction of that which goes into making a car. However for some ultra high-tech models the difference isn't that great.

The problem with motos is that they cost a lot per mile in maintenance other than gasoline. Tires only last 5-10K (10K for a real hard touring tire drivin extremely gingerly) and still cost a lot. Chains and sprockets wear out and need regular replacement, etc. etc.
PhilBiker
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Sat 10 Dec 2005, 20:49:42

My town was flooded with hurricane refugees after Rita and Katrina. For a couple of days most gas stations in town could not sell gas because they had no electricity. When the stations did open, the lines for gas were 2 or 3 hours long.

I avoided having to purchase gas for 8 days until the crisis subsided because I down own a car and ride my motorcycle the 9 miles to work every day. I did have to use the gas out of the can I keep for my lawn mower.
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby Peak_Modernity » Sat 10 Dec 2005, 21:17:54

I would prefer an Atv over a motorcycle except that they are only street legal in 5 or 6 states. Mine is a 250cc and with a simple gearing change it would easily get 55-65mpg and do highway speeds. I can mount a rack on it, carry a passenger, and it will beat any motorcycle in snow or mud. In the case of a hard collapse it would be perfectly at home on dirt roads or running through the woods. Maybe it's also my bias showing , because it is a blast to ride.
Don't worry, we have the best govt that money can buy
User avatar
Peak_Modernity
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: New York

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby Free » Sat 10 Dec 2005, 21:38:19

I can only recommend a motorcycle for the already listed reasons. The only real disadvantages I can think of is that you can't ride it in winter (although there are some crazy people who do it with sidecars...), and that it is considerably less safe than riding a car.

Hondas are great, I can only recommend them - I have a CB500, not a beauty, but a cheap reliable all purpose bike, and it takes only from 3,5 to 5 litres per 100 km.
Because I lack a garage I have to let it sit outside in the street during winter. All I had to do in spring was recharging the battery, turn the key and it was up and running!

My real dream is a diesel bike - there are some who can go 1000 km with one tank filling!!! Plus you can use biodiesel without any modification...
Not to mention the great sound of the engine, you would expect a bulldozer coming along...
"Democracy means the opportunity to be everyone's slave."
Karl Kraus
User avatar
Free
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 05:30:30

I've always dreamed of getting a Kawasaki KZ1000 with a mini bullet faring, gutting the gas engine and installing a diesel engine and running it on biodiesel. Toecutter may have had a gas bike in Mad Max, but I hate the idea of using gas. My electric Triumph race car will suit me fine when I finish it, as it will be able to hit more than 140 mph(perhaps 160 with correct tire size) and won't need one damn drop of gas to run. The biodiesel bike can come later. Problem is finding a powerful enough diesel engine that isn't too heavy for a bike. I'd want at least 100 horsepower for every 600 pounds of bike...

Oh, and an interesting article on a diesel motorcycle:

http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?section=article&storyid=901

105 mph top speed and 110 mpg.

Needs more engine. Not powerful enough. GREAT fuel economy though, but has more to do with low weight and good aerodynamics than with engine size. I'm sure a larger diesel engine that would allow it to hit 200 mph would still allow 90-100 mpg if driven normally.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby Kingcoal » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 11:20:29

I have a Honda V65 Magna with a 1100cc V4 engine. It's fast as all hell and can out run just about any car and gets about 50 MPG on the highway if I keep it below 85mph (which can be difficult.)

However, if gas goes to $10/gal and the average household income drops to $10,000/yr, I'm not sure if I can even afford it. I'll be too busy working to heat my house.
User avatar
Kingcoal
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2149
Joined: Wed 29 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Pennsylvania, USA

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 12:15:52

If gas remains available at all, it could be scarce with long lines like in the 70s. In that case, it isn't the mpg that counts, but the miles per tank, i.e. miles per visit to the gas lines. Food and shelter will remain the major expense and at $10/gallon, it still would not be the major financial stress that the biggies would be. If gas is rationed, then I could see getting a Ruckus. If gas isn't available at all, well, I think I'll worrying about trapping/storing water.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby Free » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 12:21:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', 'P')roblem is finding a powerful enough diesel engine that isn't too heavy for a bike. I'd want at least 100 horsepower for every 600 pounds of bike...

Oh, and an interesting article on a diesel motorcycle:

http://www.evworld.com/view.cfm?section=article&storyid=901

105 mph top speed and 110 mpg.

Needs more engine. Not powerful enough. GREAT fuel economy though, but has more to do with low weight and good aerodynamics than with engine size. I'm sure a larger diesel engine that would allow it to hit 200 mph would still allow 90-100 mpg if driven normally.


Well personally I don't know any diesel bike that goes much more than 100 miles per hour - it's in the nature of the diesel engine that the output goes into torque and not rpm (yes transformation, but only so much?)... but that also means that you almost literally can climb up vertical hills!

A big problem of the diesel engine is also the vibrations, you must make sure that the frame can take it... I don't think a bigger engine helps here...

As for a good engine, check out the German Hatz Diesel, they used it in this bike:

http://www.royal-enfield.de/motorrad_se ... d_hatz.htm
Last edited by Free on Sun 11 Dec 2005, 12:25:53, edited 1 time in total.
"Democracy means the opportunity to be everyone's slave."
Karl Kraus
User avatar
Free
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 12:29:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peak_Modernity', 'I') would prefer an Atv...Mine is a 250cc and with a simple gearing change it would easily get 55-65mpg and do highway speeds.


I don't think any ATV is capable of 55-65 MPG, even at very slow speeds, and with gearing changes.
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 12:35:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Free', 'y')ou can't ride it in winter


That depends on where you live. Here in Texas I ride to work every day all year long.

I don't have a car, so on the 2 days per year when we have ice on the roads, I bum a ride to work.
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby Peak_Modernity » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 13:05:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peak_Modernity', 'I') would prefer an Atv...Mine is a 250cc and with a simple gearing change it would easily get 55-65mpg and do highway speeds.


I don't think any ATV is capable of 55-65 MPG, even at very slow speeds, and with gearing changes.


Why not? A Kawasaki Ninja 250 motorcycle gets 70 mpg. My Atv is a little heavier and geared mainly for acceleration. The first two gears right now would be useless on the road, because it is set up to fly through the woods. It would easily be able to pull taller gearing and get 55-65 mpg. Just like there are different kinds of cars, there different kinds of Atvs. Atv doesn't equal Suv.
Don't worry, we have the best govt that money can buy
User avatar
Peak_Modernity
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: New York
Top

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 15:16:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Peak_Modernity', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', 'I') don't think any ATV is capable of 55-65 MPG, even at very slow speeds, and with gearing changes.

Why not?


Because they are totally different designs, for very different purposes.

Motorcycles are designed to transport the rider at highway speeds down cleared paths. ATV's are designed to plow through muck and rough terrain at low speeds.

Compare:
* Ninja 250 = 300 lbs., six-speed tranny, chain drive, manual clutch
* 250 ATV = 400 lbs., five-speed tranny, shaft drive, automatic clutch

You can't expect a vehicle that is 30% heavier and has a power-robbing shaft drive and automatic clutch to get anything approaching the mpg of one that does not.

Post P.O. an ATV would certainly be more fuel efficient than a Ford Bronco, but for transporting an individual and their junk around, it's not near as fuel efficient and cost effective as a Kawasaki KLR 250.

I'm just guessing, but I doubt any ATV can get better than 40mpg. I would like to know if any do.

ATV's are great fun. They just aren't very fuel efficient.
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles
Top

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby Peak_Modernity » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 15:37:29

Kawasaki Mojave, 249cc 4 valve DOHC, 5 speed manual clutch, chain drive, 378lbs (shaving the front plastic would drop another 7-10lbs and cut wind resistance). So it isn't that much worse off than a bike. Mpg aren't exactly a selling point of Atvs so I don't have any concrete numbers for that, but know I can ride for a long time on very little fuel. I know it wouldn't do 70 Mpg, but it would do more than 40. Now a Kfx 700 on the other hand only gets 10 Mpg. Personally, I would love to have a bike someday as well, but money doesn't grow on trees :cry:
Don't worry, we have the best govt that money can buy
User avatar
Peak_Modernity
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: New York

Re: I've decided to keep my motorcycle.

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 16:18:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')ell personally I don't know any diesel bike that goes much more than 100 miles per hour - it's in the nature of the diesel engine that the output goes into torque and not rpm (yes transformation, but only so much?)... but that also means that you almost literally can climb up vertical hills!


With taller gearing one most could certainly go more than 100 mph given the right amount of horsepower.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron