Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Mental Math

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Can you calculate 5/9ths of 36 in your head?

sure, no problem
22
No votes
no, I need paper and pencil
1
No votes
no, I need a calculator
0
0%
my calculator can't do 5/9ths
0
0%
 
Total votes : 23

Mental Math

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 20:43:43

Just curious about how well folks can do math in their heads. Can you work numbers without paper, without calculator? I know an accountant who doesn't remember anything about fractions. Students these days seem so inept and can't even use a calculator right, let alone use paper and pencil, or god forbid, do it in their head!
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 20:48:20

That's no sweat. For a real challenge, try to estimate the square root of 374 in your head.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 21:03:26

Yes, I know, but I want to get a sense of how people feel about just the simple stuff. (for the square root problem, I would approach it like this for mental math: 20x20=400; for 19x19 I figure 20x19=380 then subtract 19 for 361. so it's 19 point something. Past that I get my calculator or at least paper and pencil though I probably could get the nearest 10th before getting uncomfortable and lazy).
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 21:14:42

It's not that hard. You just have to be able to break it down.

First 20x20=(2x10)x(2x10)=(2x2)x(10x10)=4x100=400

(a-b)x(a-b)=a^2 - 2ab + b^2
Therefore
19X19=(20-1)X(20-1)=20^2 - 2x1x20 + 1^2=400 - 40 + 1=361
19.3x19.3=(20-0.7)X(20-0.7)=20^2 - 2x0.7x20 + 0.7^2=400 - 28 + 0.49=372.5
19.4X19.4=(20-0.6)x(20-0.6)=20^2 - 2x0.6x20 + 0.6^2=400 - 24 + 0.36=376.36

Therefore the square root of 374 is about 19.35
(Actual answer from calculator 19.33.)
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 21:32:17

Nice trick, but it's alot harder to do it mentally than with at least paper and pencil and it would probably be tough for an approximation to the nearest hundreths. Can you imagine what a 18th or 19th century mathematician would think of a nice little HP calculator?
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby bobcousins » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 21:54:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'N')ice trick, but it's alot harder to do it mentally than with at least paper and pencil and it would probably be tough for an approximation to the nearest hundreths. Can you imagine what a 18th or 19th century mathematician would think of a nice little HP calculator?


I think it is actually a pretty interesting question. It is the sort of thing that appears in SF. I would love to show Charles Babbage, I have a feeling he would get it straight away.

I don't want to bring religion in unnecessarily, but in those times the Church still held sway, and remember Asimov's quote about sufficiently advanced technology. Depending on the person, I can imagine a range of reactions from heart attack to being treated as the devil.

I see a lot of "number numbness" in the UK. In the old days of "cash registers", shop staff would be able to add and calculate change. Now they just press buttons and read it out, without thinking. I bought a newspaper and gum and was asked for £22. This was obviously wrong, but the person on the till did not realise until I queried it. By contrast, when I went to Germany, the staff would ask for the difference to make the change to a round number, and calculate to the Pfennig (less than worthless), and that was in the supermarket. Overall a much higher standard of education there.
It's all downhill from here
User avatar
bobcousins
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1164
Joined: Thu 14 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Left the cult

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 22:07:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobcousins', '
')Depending on the person, I can imagine a range of reactions from heart attack to being treated as the devil.
There was a good movie back in the 80's called Quest For Fire. In this story, a group of primitives go to great lengths to capture and preserve fire from it's natural occurances in nature. The story revolves around how priceless it is to these people. Late in the movie, one of these people comes across an advanced tribe that has learned to make fire themselves. The reaction was portrayed brilliantly by the actor playing the more technologically primitive human. Stunned, laughter, tears, the whole thing. This thing about calculators is just the tip of the iceberg. Imagine what Napoleon would think about modern weaponry, or Da Vinci about Moon Landings and Mach 3 flight?
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 22:09:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'N')ice trick, but it's alot harder to do it mentally than with at least paper and pencil


Not really. The only hard part is the middle term. If you can figure out 1.4 x 20 in your head, you're golden. Was doing it in Home Depot just yesterday trying to figure out the dimesions for a dog house roof.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', ' ')and it would probably be tough for an approximation to the nearest hundreths.


In your head it would be. On paper you can carry it out as far as you need to.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', ' ')Can you imagine what a 18th or 19th century mathematician would think of a nice little HP calculator?


He'd probably think the same thing most modern people do. "Where's the freaking 'equals' button?" :-D
Last edited by smallpoxgirl on Mon 05 Dec 2005, 22:13:51, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby arocoun » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 22:52:53

This is a really bad place to look for people who answer that they can't do that problem without a calculator.

Most people here are very capable of independant thought, have a relatively strong desire and ability to learn, and are capable of understanding stuff like EROEI and graphs--these are things things that more than half of people can't do. So, people here are most likely to have higher than average intelligence, especially in mathematics.

Try the same poll in a forum dedicated to the more "average" person (for example, a sports fan forum, or a Democratic/Republican party forum, for example) and you'll probably get vastly different results.
The Origin of Patriotic Philosophy
--We are Greek.
--The barbarians are not Greek.
--Therefore, we must conquer, exploit, and kill the barbarians.
User avatar
arocoun
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 22:58:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('arocoun', 'T')ry the same poll in a forum dedicated to the more "average" person (for example, a sports fan forum, or a Democratic/Republican party forum, for example) and you'll probably get vastly different results.


Just be sure to include a choice for "I don't care. If it's important, someone on Fox will tell me the answer." :-D
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby UIUCstudent01 » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 23:00:43

Easy as Pi.
User avatar
UIUCstudent01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 05 Dec 2005, 23:10:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('arocoun', '
')Try the same poll in . . . a Democratic/Republican party forum . . . and you'll probably get vastly different results.
No doubt! :lol: (of course, they might lie about it, whose gonna know?)
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby Jake_old » Tue 06 Dec 2005, 03:54:38

I chose sure no problem but I did use my fingerues for the 9x table bit, so not really done in my head.
Jake_old
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri 25 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Luton, England

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby Aedo » Tue 06 Dec 2005, 05:52:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('smallpoxgirl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', ' ')Can you imagine what a 18th or 19th century mathematician would think of a nice little HP calculator?


He'd probably think the same thing most modern people do. "Where's the freaking 'equals' button?" :-D


:lol: :lol: Spot on!
User avatar
Aedo
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu 23 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby peaker_2005 » Tue 06 Dec 2005, 09:57:54

I haven't done this sort of thing in a LOOONNGGG time.

I DO know that the ninths are the ones with the repeating digit - and that digit being the numerator (I think that's the right term. I'm a little rusty).

In other words, 5/9 = 0.5555555555555555r

(where r is shorthand for repeater).

My gut said 20 or thereabouts (it's just a little more than half of 36.

My first thought was unitary method (ie that if 100% is the complete amount, work out 1% then multiply by 55.55555r to get how much it is.. That got 19.8.

Averaging the two gives 19.9.

The calculator bore out 19.999999999999999999999999998 or something similar when I kept putting in 5's after the decimal place as opposed to it being rounded by the calculator.

Rounded, my gut was spot on.

Oh, wait, I wasn't supposed to put this up, was I?

:lol:

Oh well. Too late.......................NOW1
User avatar
peaker_2005
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Fri 02 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 06 Dec 2005, 10:48:43

How about dividing 45 by 5/9ths? You wouldn't have to make them much harder before alot of smart people would scratch their heads. People forget this stuff, because of all the prosthetic brains we have working for us. How about multiplying 84 times 3/7ths? (I know, simple, no problema, but I think some of you would be suprised!)
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: Mental Math

Unread postby Andrew_S » Tue 06 Dec 2005, 11:42:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'H')ow about dividing 45 by 5/9ths? You wouldn't have to make them much harder before alot of smart people would scratch their heads. People forget this stuff, because of all the prosthetic brains we have working for us. How about multiplying 84 times 3/7ths? (I know, simple, no problema, but I think some of you would be suprised!)


All your examples are fairly easy because there's one easy division (with no remainder) and then a fairly easy multiplication.

5/9 x 36 = 5 x 36/9 = 5 x 4 = 20

45 div 5/9 = 45/5 x 9 = 9 x9 = 81

84 x 3/7 = 84/7 x 3 = 12 x 3 = 36

Any divisions with a remainder would make it more challenging and to be honest I wouldn't bother.

My dad was an engineer and could calculate with a slide rule at least as fast as people with pocket calculators (square and cube roots also). He would also do the family budget involving plenty of long divisions in his head while sitting on the bog. :-D
Mum would read the calcualtions to him bit by bit.

It seems the sliderule was invented in the early 17th century:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he slide rule was invented around 1620–1630, shortly after John Napier's publication of the concept of the logarithm. Edmund Gunter of Oxford developed a calculating device with a single logarithmic scale, which, with additional measuring tools, could be used to multiply and divide. In 1630, William Oughtred of Cambridge invented a circular slide rule, and in 1632 he combined two Gunter rules, held together with the hands, to make a device that is recognizably the modern slide rule.


Wikipedia sliderule history

So even in the 19th century they could easily do what most people do on pocket calculators.
Andrew_S
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun 09 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron